From: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
To: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/uc: Use u64 for offsets for which we use upper_32_bits()
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:33:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0397652-bd5d-4651-83e2-0828cffd0581@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240318184225.3808240-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
On 3/18/2024 11:42, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
> The GGTT is currently a 32 bit address space, but the HW and GuC
> support 48b addresses in GGTT-related operations, both to keep the
> interface/HW paths common between PPGTT and GGTT and to allow for
> future increase of the GGTT size.
> This leaves us having to program a 64b field with a 32b offset, which
> currently we're in some cases doing this by using an upper_32_bits()
> call on a 32b variable, which doesn't make any sense. To do this cleanly
> we have 2 options:
>
> 1 - Set the upper 32 bits directly to zero.
> 2 - Use 64b variables for the offset and keep programming the whole thing,
> so we're ready if we ever have bigger offsets.
>
> This patch goes with option #2 and switches the related variables to u64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_hwconfig.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc_fw.c | 3 ++-
> 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> index 9ed939c20602..1dfef2c29650 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static u32 guc_ctl_feature_flags(struct xe_guc *guc)
>
> static u32 guc_ctl_log_params_flags(struct xe_guc *guc)
> {
> - u32 offset = guc_bo_ggtt_addr(guc, guc->log.bo) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + u64 offset = guc_bo_ggtt_addr(guc, guc->log.bo) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
This one does not do upper/lower(offset). The offset is simply shifted
into a field position and OR'd into the u32 flags word below.
The whole flags construction should probably be updated to use the reg
field macros, but I don't think making offset 64 bits gains anything here.
John.
> u32 flags;
>
> #if (((CRASH_BUFFER_SIZE) % SZ_1M) == 0)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_hwconfig.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_hwconfig.c
> index ea49f3885c10..525e51cc7aa7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_hwconfig.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_hwconfig.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
> #include "xe_guc.h"
> #include "xe_map.h"
>
> -static int send_get_hwconfig(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 ggtt_addr, u32 size)
> +static int send_get_hwconfig(struct xe_guc *guc, u64 ggtt_addr, u32 size)
> {
> u32 action[] = {
> XE_GUC_ACTION_GET_HWCONFIG,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> index d51cb9a4a6b7..9d3771ec5ceb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ static void register_engine(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> info.flags = CONTEXT_REGISTRATION_FLAG_KMD;
>
> if (xe_exec_queue_is_parallel(q)) {
> - u32 ggtt_addr = xe_lrc_parallel_ggtt_addr(lrc);
> + u64 ggtt_addr = xe_lrc_parallel_ggtt_addr(lrc);
> struct iosys_map map = xe_lrc_parallel_map(lrc);
>
> info.wq_desc_lo = lower_32_bits(ggtt_addr +
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc_fw.c
> index 44b8c5f58fd8..7e44c468eb0f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc_fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc_fw.c
> @@ -788,7 +788,8 @@ static int uc_fw_xfer(struct xe_uc_fw *uc_fw, u32 offset, u32 dma_flags)
> {
> struct xe_device *xe = uc_fw_to_xe(uc_fw);
> struct xe_gt *gt = uc_fw_to_gt(uc_fw);
> - u32 src_offset, dma_ctrl;
> + u64 src_offset;
> + u32 dma_ctrl;
> int ret;
>
> xe_force_wake_assert_held(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-18 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-18 18:42 [PATCH] drm/xe/uc: Use u64 for offsets for which we use upper_32_bits() Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-03-18 22:33 ` John Harrison [this message]
2024-03-18 22:48 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-03-19 1:50 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-03-19 1:51 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-03-19 1:51 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-03-19 2:02 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-03-19 2:05 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-03-19 2:06 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-03-19 2:28 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c0397652-bd5d-4651-83e2-0828cffd0581@intel.com \
--to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox