Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ghimiray, Himal Prasad" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
To: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 7/7] drm/xe: Implement fdinfo memory stats printing
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 11:52:49 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c6509d5f-cc5c-4017-abfe-b9b6d194caa9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230831090536.2949934-8-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5498 bytes --]


On 31-08-2023 14:35, Tejas Upadhyay wrote:
> Use the newly added drm_print_memory_stats helper to show memory
> utilisation of our objects in drm/driver specific fdinfo output.
>
> To collect the stats we walk the per memory regions object lists
> and accumulate object size into the respective drm_memory_stats
> categories.
>
> Objects with multiple possible placements are reported in multiple
> regions for total and shared sizes, while other categories are
> counted only for the currently active region.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay<tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h         |  11 +++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   2 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
> index 0823dda0f31b..538a9ec7f4c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
>   #ifndef _XE_BO_H_
>   #define _XE_BO_H_
>   
> +#include <drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h>
> +
>   #include "xe_bo_types.h"
>   #include "xe_macros.h"
>   #include "xe_vm_types.h"
> @@ -258,6 +260,15 @@ static inline size_t xe_bo_ccs_pages_start(struct xe_bo *bo)
>   	return PAGE_ALIGN(bo->ttm.base.size);
>   }
>   
> +static inline bool xe_bo_has_pages(struct xe_bo *bo)
> +{
> +	if ((bo->ttm.ttm && ttm_tt_is_populated(bo->ttm.ttm)) ||
> +	    xe_bo_is_vram(bo))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>   void __xe_bo_release_dummy(struct kref *kref);
>   
>   /**
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.c
> index 00b28a08909f..28b4c8e608f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.c
> @@ -4,10 +4,12 @@
>    */
>   
>   #include <drm/drm_print.h>
> +#include <drm/xe_drm.h>
>   #include <linux/kernel.h>
>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>   #include <linux/types.h>
>   
> +#include "xe_bo.h"
>   #include "xe_bo_types.h"
>   #include "xe_device_types.h"
>   #include "xe_drm_client.h"
> @@ -110,6 +112,105 @@ bool xe_drm_client_remove_bo(struct xe_bo *bo)
>   	return true;
>   }
>   
> +static void bo_meminfo(struct xe_bo *bo,
> +		       struct drm_memory_stats stats[TTM_NUM_MEM_TYPES])
> +{
> +	u64 sz = bo->size;
> +	u32 mem_type;
> +
> +	if (bo->placement.placement)
> +		mem_type = bo->placement.placement->mem_type;
> +	else
> +		mem_type = XE_PL_TT;
> +
> +	if (bo->ttm.base.handle_count > 1)
> +		stats[mem_type].shared += sz;
> +	else
> +		stats[mem_type].private += sz;
> +
> +	if (xe_bo_has_pages(bo)) {
> +		stats[mem_type].resident += sz;
> +
> +		if (!dma_resv_test_signaled(bo->ttm.base.resv,
> +					    dma_resv_usage_rw(true) |
> +					    DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP))
> +			stats[mem_type].active += sz;
> +		else if (mem_type == XE_PL_SYSTEM)
> +			stats[mem_type].purgeable += sz;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void show_meminfo(struct drm_printer *p, struct drm_file *file)
> +{
> +	struct drm_memory_stats stats[TTM_NUM_MEM_TYPES] = {};
> +	struct xe_file *xef = file->driver_priv;
> +	struct ttm_device *bdev = &xef->xe->ttm;
> +	struct ttm_resource_manager *man;
> +	struct xe_drm_client *client;
> +	struct list_head *pos;
> +	struct xe_bo *bo;
> +	unsigned int id;
> +	char name[16];
> +	u32 mem_type;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	client = xef->client;
> +
> +	/* Public objects. */
> +	spin_lock(&file->table_lock);
> +	idr_for_each_entry(&file->object_idr, bo, id)
> +		bo_meminfo(bo, stats);
> +	spin_unlock(&file->table_lock);
> +
> +	/* Internal objects. */
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	list_for_each_rcu(pos, &client->bos_list) {
> +		bo = xe_bo_get(list_entry(pos, typeof(*bo),
> +					  client_link));
> +		if (!bo)
> +			continue;
> +		bo_meminfo(bo, stats);
> +		xe_bo_put(bo);
> +	}
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	for (mem_type = XE_PL_SYSTEM; mem_type < TTM_NUM_MEM_TYPES; ++mem_type) {

can avoid this switch case with something like

const char* mem_type_to_name []  = {

"system",  /*XE_PL_STOLEN */

"gtt",

"vram0"

"vram1"

NULL,

NULL,

"stolen",

},

> +
> +		switch (mem_type) {
> +		case XE_PL_SYSTEM:
> +			sprintf(name, "system");
> +			break;
> +		case XE_PL_TT:
> +			sprintf(name, "gtt");
> +			break;
> +		case XE_PL_VRAM0:
> +			sprintf(name, "vram%d", mem_type - XE_PL_VRAM0);
> +			break;
> +		case XE_PL_VRAM1:
> +			sprintf(name, "vram%d", mem_type - XE_PL_VRAM0);
> +			break;
> +		case XE_PL_STOLEN:
> +			sprintf(name, "stolen");
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (ret == -EINVAL)
> +			continue;

if (! mem_type_to_name[mem_type])

continue;

> +
> +		man = ttm_manager_type(bdev, mem_type);
I assume on single tile platform man will be null for vram1 ? Please 
confirm.
> +
> +		if (man) {
> +			drm_print_memory_stats(p,
> +					       &stats[mem_type],
> +					       DRM_GEM_OBJECT_RESIDENT |
> +					       DRM_GEM_OBJECT_PURGEABLE,
> +					       name);

instead of name can use mem_type_to_name[mem_type].

Will leave it up to decide whether to use switch-case or const char*.

Ensure DRM_GEM_OBJECT_PURGEABLE is not reported for vram0 and vram1.

BR

Himal Ghimiray

> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
>   /**
>    * xe_drm_client_fdinfo() - Callback for fdinfo interface
>    * @p: The drm_printer ptr
> @@ -122,6 +223,6 @@ bool xe_drm_client_remove_bo(struct xe_bo *bo)
>    */
>   void xe_drm_client_fdinfo(struct drm_printer *p, struct drm_file *file)
>   {
> -	/* show_meminfo() will be developed here */
> +	show_meminfo(p, file);
>   }
>   #endif

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7177 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-12  6:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-31  9:05 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/7] drm/xe: fdinfo memory stats Tejas Upadhyay
2023-08-31  9:05 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/7] drm/xe: Add drm-client infrastructure Tejas Upadhyay
2023-09-06  4:14   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2023-09-07  8:57     ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2023-09-12  8:24       ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2023-08-31  9:05 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/7] drm/xe: Interface xe drm client with fdinfo interface Tejas Upadhyay
2023-09-06  4:21   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2023-08-31  9:05 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/7] drm/xe: Add tracking support for bos per client Tejas Upadhyay
2023-09-06  9:38   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2023-09-07  8:52     ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2023-08-31  9:05 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/7] drm/xe: Record each drm client with its VM Tejas Upadhyay
2023-09-06  9:47   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2023-09-07  8:49     ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2023-09-07  9:28       ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2023-09-07  9:44         ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2023-08-31  9:05 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 5/7] drm/xe: Track page table memory usage for client Tejas Upadhyay
2023-09-06  9:54   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2023-09-07  8:40     ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2023-08-31  9:05 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 6/7] drm/xe: Account ring buffer and context state storage Tejas Upadhyay
2023-09-06 11:19   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2023-08-31  9:05 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 7/7] drm/xe: Implement fdinfo memory stats printing Tejas Upadhyay
2023-08-31 12:19   ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2023-09-12  6:22   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad [this message]
2023-09-12 11:14     ` Jani Nikula
2023-08-31  9:21 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: fdinfo memory stats Patchwork
2023-08-31  9:21 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-08-31  9:22 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-08-31  9:29 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-08-31  9:30 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2023-08-31  9:30 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2023-08-31 10:04 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-08-31 11:23 ` Patchwork
2023-09-07  9:22 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/7] " Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2023-09-07  9:35   ` Upadhyay, Tejas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c6509d5f-cc5c-4017-abfe-b9b6d194caa9@intel.com \
    --to=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox