Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ghimiray, Himal Prasad" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/xe: Incase of action add failure, remove sysfs only once.
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:46:12 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cbe92280-f46d-42a9-acb4-35e080844562@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <atf7fcy2ignoudayaogol7v3bk5qcxmpmjtseltdbcyykzm55n@x2mwopb74dns>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1005 bytes --]


On 10-04-2024 01:22, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 08:19:42PM +0530, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
>> The drmm_add_action_or_reset function automatically invokes the action
>> (sysfs removal) in the event of a failure; therefore, there's no
>> necessity to call it within the return check. Additionally, it issues a
>> warning regarding the failure to add the action. Consequently, there's
>> no requirement to print a nearly identical warning within the xe driver.
>
> there's actually no need to print a warning at all? If we already add a
> warning in drmm_add_action_or_reset(), that should be sufficient.

Indeed, you are correct regarding the warning need. Including the 
warning print from driver doesn't offer any additional benefit. However, 
I opted to modify it and maintain the warning print in this scenario to 
prevent the potential noise that might arise from the static analyzer 
detecting an unhandled return type from |drmm_add_action_or_reset.|

>
>
> Lucas De Marchi

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4457 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-10  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-08 14:49 [PATCH 0/4] Cleanup and fixes in drmm_add_action_or_reset usage Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-04-08 14:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/xe: Simplify function return using drmm_add_action_or_reset() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-04-08 15:08   ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-09 19:48     ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-04-08 14:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/xe: Incase of action add failure, remove sysfs only once Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-04-09 19:52   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-04-10  8:16     ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad [this message]
2024-04-10 13:49       ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-04-08 14:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/xe: Incase of action add failure, free_gsc_pkt " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-04-08 17:32   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-04-08 14:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/xe: Return NULL incase of drmm_add_action_or_reset failure Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-04-09 19:55   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-04-08 16:58 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Cleanup and fixes in drmm_add_action_or_reset usage (rev2) Patchwork
2024-04-08 16:58 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-04-08 16:59 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-04-08 17:11 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-08 17:14 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-08 17:15 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-04-08 17:42 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-04-08 21:14 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cbe92280-f46d-42a9-acb4-35e080844562@intel.com \
    --to=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox