From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 01/14] drm/xe: Make exec_queue_kill safe to call twice
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 15:22:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce2b44d0-eaf9-4f00-bff0-170c4bcf5f24@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZpGqGUsECblGxJCI@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com>
On 7/12/2024 3:11 PM, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 02:28:45PM -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
>> An upcoming PXP patch will kill queues at runtime when a PXP
>> invalidation event occurs, so we need exec_queue_kill to be safe to call
>> multiple times.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
>> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Not opposed this patch but is this really required for PXP as PXP queue
> are not in LR mode are they?
>
> Either way, I'm open to accepting this as xe_exec_queue_kill probably
> should be safe to call twice anyways.
Not required for PXP, no. I just really didn't like the idea of calling
a function twice when it wasn't designed to support multiple calls, even
if it didn't apply to my specific case.
Daniele
>
> Matt
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
>> index 5b166fa03684..02f684c0330d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
>> @@ -280,8 +280,10 @@ void xe_vm_remove_compute_exec_queue(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>> return;
>>
>> down_write(&vm->lock);
>> - list_del(&q->lr.link);
>> - --vm->preempt.num_exec_queues;
>> + if (!list_empty(&q->lr.link)) {
>> + list_del_init(&q->lr.link);
>> + --vm->preempt.num_exec_queues;
>> + }
>> if (q->lr.pfence) {
>> dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(q->lr.pfence);
>> dma_fence_put(q->lr.pfence);
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-12 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-12 21:28 [RFC 00/14] Add PXP HWDRM support Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-12 21:28 ` [RFC 01/14] drm/xe: Make exec_queue_kill safe to call twice Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-12 22:11 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-12 22:22 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio [this message]
2024-07-12 22:46 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-12 21:28 ` [RFC 02/14] drm/xe/pxp: Initialize PXP structure and KCR reg Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-12 21:28 ` [RFC 03/14] drm/xe/pxp: Allocate PXP execution resources Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-12 22:43 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-12 23:00 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-12 23:14 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-12 21:28 ` [RFC 04/14] drm/xe/pxp: Add VCS inline termination support Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-12 21:28 ` [RFC 05/14] drm/xe/pxp: Add GSC session invalidation support Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-12 21:28 ` [RFC 06/14] drm/xe/pxp: Handle the PXP termination interrupt Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-12 21:28 ` [RFC 07/14] drm/xe/pxp: Add GSC session initialization support Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-12 21:28 ` [RFC 08/14] drm/xe/pxp: Add hooks to mark an exec queue as using PXP Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-12 21:28 ` [RFC 09/14] drm/xe/pxp: Add API to mark a " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-12 21:28 ` [RFC 10/14] drm/xe/pxp: add a query for PXP status Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-15 17:54 ` Souza, Jose
2024-07-15 18:03 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-15 18:41 ` Souza, Jose
2024-07-15 19:38 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-15 19:52 ` Souza, Jose
2024-07-15 20:06 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-15 20:16 ` Souza, Jose
2024-07-15 20:19 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-12 21:28 ` [RFC 11/14] drm/xe/pxp: Add API to mark a BO as using PXP Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-12 21:28 ` [RFC 12/14] drm/xe/pxp: add PXP PM support Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-12 21:28 ` [RFC 13/14] drm/xe/pxp: Add PXP debugfs support Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-12 21:28 ` [RFC 14/14] drm/xe/pxp: Enable PXP for MTL Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-07-12 21:34 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for Add PXP HWDRM support Patchwork
2024-07-16 20:39 ` [RFC 00/14] " Souza, Jose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ce2b44d0-eaf9-4f00-bff0-170c4bcf5f24@intel.com \
--to=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox