intel-xe.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: matthew.brost@intel.com, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com,
	brian.welty@intel.com, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Update page fault queue size calculation
Date: Tue,  9 Jul 2024 18:40:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1720550129.git.stuart.summers@intel.com> (raw)

Right now the page fault queue size is hard coded with an
estimated value based on legacy platforms. Add a more precise
calculation based on the number of compute resources available
which can utilize these page fault queues.

v2: Add a drm reset callback for the teardown changes and other
    suggestions from Matt.

Original series: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/134694/

Stuart Summers (2):
  drm/xe: Fix missing workqueue destroy in xe_gt_pagefault
  drm/xe: Use topology to determine page fault queue size

 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h     |  9 +++-
 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2024-07-09 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-09 18:40 Stuart Summers [this message]
2024-07-09 18:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Fix missing workqueue destroy in xe_gt_pagefault Stuart Summers
2024-07-09 18:59   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-07-09 20:48     ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-09 22:54       ` Summers, Stuart
2024-07-09 18:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Use topology to determine page fault queue size Stuart Summers
2024-07-09 20:52   ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-09 22:53     ` Summers, Stuart
2024-07-11 17:26       ` Summers, Stuart
2024-07-09 18:48 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Update page fault queue size calculation Patchwork
2024-07-09 18:48 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-07-09 18:49 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-07-09 19:01 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-07-09 19:03 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-07-09 19:05 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2024-07-09 19:39 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-07-09 21:40 ` ✓ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-07-11 17:36 [PATCH 0/2] " Stuart Summers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1720550129.git.stuart.summers@intel.com \
    --to=stuart.summers@intel.com \
    --cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
    --cc=brian.welty@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).