From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Use display parent interface for runtime pm
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 12:50:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d28d4a6355e691f27c2dc2dffe62cc0242b11860@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251030202836.1815680-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com>
On Thu, 30 Oct 2025, Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> wrote:
> Add struct intel_display_parent_interface which is supposed to contain
> function pointers passed at display probe. This is supposed to allow
> differing implementations between i915 and xe drivers.
>
> Add runtime pm as an example and first set of functions using this new
> mechanism. Pass own implementations of runtime from i915 and xe
> drivers during probe.
Good stuff, let's merge? We've got two sets of eyes on patch 1, that's
enough.
BR,
Jani.
>
> v3:
> - useless includes removed
> - drop xe_display_rpm_{get, put}_raw
> v2:
> - unrelated include removal dropped
> - add _interface suffix to rpm function pointer struct
> - add struct ref_tracker forward declaration
> - use kernel-doc comments as needed
> - move i915 display rpm interface implementation to intel_runtime_pm.c
> - rename intel_display as i915_display
> - move xe_display_rpm_interface code into xe_display_rpm.c
> - rename xe_rpm as xe_display_rpm
> - use <> when including drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h
> - drop checks for validity of rpm function pointers
> - keep xe_display_rpm.c
>
> Jani Nikula (1):
> drm/{i915,xe}/display: pass parent interface to display probe
>
> Jouni Högander (5):
> drm/{i915,xe}/display: Add display runtime pm parent interface
> drm/i915/display: Runtime pm wrappers for display parent interface
> drm/xe/display: Runtime pm wrappers for display parent interface
> drm/i915/display: Use display parent interface for i915 runtime pm
> drm/xe/display: Use display parent interface for xe runtime pm
>
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h | 4 +
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c | 5 +-
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h | 4 +-
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c | 33 ++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 12 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.h | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h | 3 +
> .../gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 8 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display_rpm.c | 61 +++++++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display_rpm.h | 11 +++
> include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h | 45 +++++++++++
> 14 files changed, 215 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display_rpm.h
> create mode 100644 include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-31 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-30 20:28 [PATCH v3 0/6] Use display parent interface for runtime pm Jouni Högander
2025-10-30 20:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] drm/{i915, xe}/display: pass parent interface to display probe Jouni Högander
2025-10-30 20:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] drm/{i915, xe}/display: Add display runtime pm parent interface Jouni Högander
2025-10-30 20:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] drm/i915/display: Runtime pm wrappers for display " Jouni Högander
2025-10-30 20:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] drm/xe/display: " Jouni Högander
2025-10-30 20:28 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] drm/i915/display: Use display parent interface for i915 runtime pm Jouni Högander
2025-10-30 20:28 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] drm/xe/display: Use display parent interface for xe " Jouni Högander
2025-10-30 21:43 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Use display parent interface for runtime pm (rev3) Patchwork
2025-10-30 21:44 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-10-30 22:00 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-10-30 22:28 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-10-31 6:16 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-11-03 9:53 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-31 10:50 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-10-31 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] Use display parent interface for runtime pm Hogander, Jouni
2025-11-03 10:16 ` Hogander, Jouni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d28d4a6355e691f27c2dc2dffe62cc0242b11860@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox