Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Manna, Animesh" <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/psr: Introduce helper intel_psr_set_non_psr_pipes()
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 07:57:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d385cd74ebdbc8d1843bc17eaae670ec5007d7de.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251015072217.1710717-7-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

On Wed, 2025-10-15 at 12:52 +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Add a function to set non-psr pipes in crtc_state based on psr
> features.
> This will help to move this part later where we re-evaluate psr
> features
> and update the non-psr pipes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 49 ++++++++++++++--------
> --
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 1d06011a97ce..e97dcfa7673c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -1711,15 +1711,40 @@ static bool
> intel_psr_needs_wa_18037818876(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  		!crtc_state->has_sel_update);
>  }
>  
> +static
> +void intel_psr_set_non_psr_pipes(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> +				 struct intel_crtc_state
> *crtc_state)
> +{
> +	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> +	struct intel_atomic_state *state =
> to_intel_atomic_state(crtc_state->uapi.state);
> +	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> +	u8 active_pipes = 0;
> +
> +	/* Wa_16025596647 */
> +	if (DISPLAY_VER(display) != 20 &&
> +	    !IS_DISPLAY_VERx100_STEP(display, 3000, STEP_A0,
> STEP_B0))
> +		return;
> +
> +	/* Not needed by Panel Replay  */
> +	if (crtc_state->has_panel_replay)
> +		return;
> +
> +	/* We ignore possible secondary PSR/Panel Replay capable eDP
> */
> +	for_each_intel_crtc(display->drm, crtc)
> +		active_pipes |= crtc->active ? BIT(crtc->pipe) : 0;
> +
> +	active_pipes = intel_calc_active_pipes(state, active_pipes);
> +
> +	crtc_state->active_non_psr_pipes = active_pipes &
> +		~BIT(to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc)->pipe);
> +}
> +
>  void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  			      struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  			      struct drm_connector_state
> *conn_state)
>  {
>  	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
>  	const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state-
> >hw.adjusted_mode;
> -	struct intel_atomic_state *state =
> to_intel_atomic_state(crtc_state->uapi.state);
> -	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> -	u8 active_pipes = 0;
>  
>  	if (!psr_global_enabled(intel_dp)) {
>  		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "PSR disabled by flag\n");
> @@ -1768,23 +1793,7 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
>  			    "PSR disabled to workaround PSR FSM hang
> issue\n");
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Rest is for Wa_16025596647 */
> -	if (DISPLAY_VER(display) != 20 &&
> -	    !IS_DISPLAY_VERx100_STEP(display, 3000, STEP_A0,
> STEP_B0))
> -		return;
> -
> -	/* Not needed by Panel Replay  */
> -	if (crtc_state->has_panel_replay)
> -		return;
> -
> -	/* We ignore possible secondary PSR/Panel Replay capable eDP
> */
> -	for_each_intel_crtc(display->drm, crtc)
> -		active_pipes |= crtc->active ? BIT(crtc->pipe) : 0;
> -
> -	active_pipes = intel_calc_active_pipes(state, active_pipes);
> -
> -	crtc_state->active_non_psr_pipes = active_pipes &
> -		~BIT(to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc)->pipe);
> +	intel_psr_set_non_psr_pipes(intel_dp, crtc_state);
>  }
>  
>  void intel_psr_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-15  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-15  7:22 [PATCH 00/10] Preparatory patches for guardband optimization Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15  7:22 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915/vrr: Use crtc_vsync_start/end for computing vrr.vsync_start/end Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15  7:22 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915/display: Move intel_dpll_crtc_compute_clock early Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15  7:22 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915/vrr: s/intel_vrr_compute_config_late/intel_vrr_compute_guardband Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15  7:22 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/vblank: Add helper to get correct vblank length Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15  7:22 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915/psr: Consider SCL lines when validating vblank for wake latency Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15  7:22 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/psr: Introduce helper intel_psr_set_non_psr_pipes() Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15  7:57   ` Hogander, Jouni [this message]
2025-10-15  7:22 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/display: Introduce dp/psr_compute_config_late() Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15  7:59   ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-15  7:22 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915/psr: Check if final vblank is sufficient for PSR features Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15  8:23   ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-15  8:33     ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-15  9:14   ` Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15  9:32     ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-15  7:22 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/display: Add vblank_start adjustment logic for always-on VRR TG Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15 13:54   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-15  7:22 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915/display: Prepare for vblank_delay for LRR Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15 15:00   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-15  8:18 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Preparatory patches for guardband optimization (rev6) Patchwork
2025-10-15  8:33 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-10-15  9:42 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-10-15 13:59 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Preparatory patches for guardband optimization (rev7) Patchwork
2025-10-15 14:14 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-10-15 14:36 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-10-15 18:46 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for Preparatory patches for guardband optimization (rev6) Patchwork
2025-10-15 23:29 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for Preparatory patches for guardband optimization (rev7) Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-16  5:54 [PATCH 00/10] Preparatory patches for guardband optimization Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-16  5:54 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/psr: Introduce helper intel_psr_set_non_psr_pipes() Ankit Nautiyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d385cd74ebdbc8d1843bc17eaae670ec5007d7de.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    --cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox