From: "Belgaumkar, Vinay" <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] drm/xe: Add a wrapper for set/unset params
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:13:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d515821e-0401-46f6-8e57-7aa419a16207@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48a4d279-5cc0-432b-8398-295116419cda@intel.com>
On 1/27/2026 3:32 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> subject is too generic, maybe mention GuC/PC/RC ?
>
> "drm/xe/guc: Add wrappers for set/unset SLPC params"
ok.
>
>
> On 1/24/2026 12:50 AM, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>> Also, extract out the GuC RC related set/unset param functions
>> into xe_guc_rc file. GuC still allows us to override GuC RC mode
>> using an SLPC H2G interface. Continue to use that interface, but
>> move the related code to the newly created xe_guc_rc file.
>>
>> v2: xe_guc_rc functions to use guc pointer instead of gt (Michal W)
>> v3: Assert if runtime pm ref is not held (Michal W)
>> v4: Review comments (Riana)
>>
>> Cc: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h | 5 ++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h | 3 ++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c | 9 +++---
>> 5 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>> index cf02c53ca3c5..31c6cb111916 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>> @@ -264,6 +264,37 @@ static int pc_action_unset_param(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u8 id)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * xe_guc_pc_action_set_param() - Set value of SLPC param
>> + * @pc: Xe_GuC_PC instance
>> + * @id: Param id
>> + * @value: Value to set
>> + *
>> + * This function can be used to set any SLPC param.
>> + *
>> + * Returns: 0 on Success
> * Return: 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
ok.
>
>> + */
>> +int xe_guc_pc_action_set_param(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u8 id, u32 value)
>> +{
>> + xe_device_assert_mem_access(pc_to_xe(pc));
>> + return pc_action_set_param(pc, id, value);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * xe_guc_pc_action_unset_param() - Revert to default value
>> + * @pc: Xe_GuC_PC instance
>> + * @id: Param id
>> + *
>> + * This function can be used revert any SLPC param to its default value.
>> + *
>> + * Returns: 0 on Success
> ditto
ok.
>
>> + */
>> +int xe_guc_pc_action_unset_param(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u8 id)
>> +{
>> + xe_device_assert_mem_access(pc_to_xe(pc));
>> + return pc_action_unset_param(pc, id);
>> +}
>> +
>> static u32 decode_freq(u32 raw)
>> {
>> return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(raw * GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER,
>> @@ -1045,31 +1076,6 @@ int xe_guc_pc_restore_stashed_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -/**
>> - * xe_guc_pc_override_gucrc_mode - override GUCRC mode
>> - * @pc: Xe_GuC_PC instance
>> - * @mode: new value of the mode.
>> - *
>> - * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on error
>> - */
>> -int xe_guc_pc_override_gucrc_mode(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, enum slpc_gucrc_mode mode)
>> -{
>> - guard(xe_pm_runtime)(pc_to_xe(pc));
>> - return pc_action_set_param(pc, SLPC_PARAM_PWRGATE_RC_MODE, mode);
>> -}
>> -
>> -/**
>> - * xe_guc_pc_unset_gucrc_mode - unset GUCRC mode override
>> - * @pc: Xe_GuC_PC instance
>> - *
>> - * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on error
>> - */
>> -int xe_guc_pc_unset_gucrc_mode(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
>> -{
>> - guard(xe_pm_runtime)(pc_to_xe(pc));
>> - return pc_action_unset_param(pc, SLPC_PARAM_PWRGATE_RC_MODE);
>> -}
>> -
>> static void pc_init_pcode_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
>> {
>> u32 min = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(pc->rpn_freq, GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
>> index 1b95873b262e..0678a4e787b3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
>> @@ -9,15 +9,14 @@
>> #include <linux/types.h>
>>
>> struct xe_guc_pc;
>> -enum slpc_gucrc_mode;
>> struct drm_printer;
>>
>> int xe_guc_pc_init(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>> int xe_guc_pc_start(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>> int xe_guc_pc_stop(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>> -int xe_guc_pc_override_gucrc_mode(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, enum slpc_gucrc_mode mode);
>> -int xe_guc_pc_unset_gucrc_mode(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>> void xe_guc_pc_print(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, struct drm_printer *p);
>> +int xe_guc_pc_action_set_param(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u8 id, u32 value);
>> +int xe_guc_pc_action_unset_param(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u8 id);
>>
>> u32 xe_guc_pc_get_act_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>> int xe_guc_pc_get_cur_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u32 *freq);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c
>> index fc57e5290635..0a900c309ecf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>> #include "xe_gt_printk.h"
>> #include "xe_guc.h"
>> #include "xe_guc_ct.h"
>> +#include "xe_guc_pc.h"
>> #include "xe_guc_rc.h"
>> #include "xe_pm.h"
>>
>> @@ -112,3 +113,32 @@ int xe_guc_rc_enable(struct xe_guc *guc)
>>
>> return guc_action_setup_gucrc(guc, GUCRC_FIRMWARE_CONTROL);
>> }
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * xe_guc_rc_set_mode() - set GUCRC mode
>> + * @guc: Xe GuC instance
>> + * @mode: new value of the mode.
>> + *
>> + * Function to set GuC RC mode to one of the enum values.
>> + *
>> + * Returns: 0 on success, negative error code on error
>> + */
>> +int xe_guc_rc_set_mode(struct xe_guc *guc, enum slpc_gucrc_mode mode)
>> +{
>> + guard(xe_pm_runtime)(guc_to_xe(guc));
> are we sure we want to do full resume here?
> maybe it should be:
>
> guard(xe_pm_runtime_noresume)
>
>> + return xe_guc_pc_action_set_param(&guc->pc, SLPC_PARAM_PWRGATE_RC_MODE, mode);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * xe_guc_rc_unset_mode() - revert to default mode
>> + * @guc: Xe GuC instance
>> + *
>> + * Function to revert GuC RC mode to platform defaults.
>> + *
>> + * Returns: 0 on success, negative error code on error
>> + */
>> +int xe_guc_rc_unset_mode(struct xe_guc *guc)
>> +{
>> + guard(xe_pm_runtime)(guc_to_xe(guc));
> ditto
ok.
>
>> + return xe_guc_pc_action_unset_param(&guc->pc, SLPC_PARAM_PWRGATE_RC_MODE);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h
>> index c980b0fce472..d76dfad8e26c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h
>> @@ -7,8 +7,11 @@
>> #define _XE_GUC_RC_H_
>>
>> struct xe_guc;
>> +enum slpc_gucrc_mode;
>>
>> void xe_guc_rc_disable(struct xe_guc *guc);
>> int xe_guc_rc_enable(struct xe_guc *guc);
>> +int xe_guc_rc_set_mode(struct xe_guc *guc, enum slpc_gucrc_mode mode);
>> +int xe_guc_rc_unset_mode(struct xe_guc *guc);
>>
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
>> index abf87fe0b345..f7752719b74f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
>> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
>> #include "xe_gt.h"
>> #include "xe_gt_mcr.h"
>> #include "xe_gt_printk.h"
>> -#include "xe_guc_pc.h"
>> +#include "xe_guc_rc.h"
>> #include "xe_macros.h"
>> #include "xe_mmio.h"
>> #include "xe_oa.h"
>> @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ static void xe_oa_stream_destroy(struct xe_oa_stream *stream)
>>
>> /* Wa_1509372804:pvc: Unset the override of GUCRC mode to enable rc6 */
>> if (stream->override_gucrc)
>> - xe_gt_WARN_ON(gt, xe_guc_pc_unset_gucrc_mode(>->uc.guc.pc));
>> + xe_gt_WARN_ON(gt, xe_guc_rc_unset_mode(>->uc.guc));
> as return real error code, not bool, maybe we should also print it?
We already print it in the lower level function pc_action_unset_param().
>
>>
>> xe_oa_free_configs(stream);
>> xe_file_put(stream->xef);
>> @@ -1765,8 +1765,7 @@ static int xe_oa_stream_init(struct xe_oa_stream *stream,
>> * state. Prevent this by overriding GUCRC mode.
>> */
>> if (XE_GT_WA(stream->gt, 1509372804)) {
>> - ret = xe_guc_pc_override_gucrc_mode(>->uc.guc.pc,
>> - SLPC_GUCRC_MODE_GUCRC_NO_RC6);
>> + ret = xe_guc_rc_set_mode(>->uc.guc, SLPC_GUCRC_MODE_GUCRC_NO_RC6);
>> if (ret)
>> goto err_free_configs;
>>
>> @@ -1824,7 +1823,7 @@ static int xe_oa_stream_init(struct xe_oa_stream *stream,
>> xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), stream->fw_ref);
>> xe_pm_runtime_put(stream->oa->xe);
> we should just place guc_rc calls when we still are holding rpm
For now, that seems to be true. But if someone introduces a sysfs
interface later on and forgets to add a runtime_get(), it's better to
have it in the guc_rc function as well?
Thanks,
Vinay.
>
>> if (stream->override_gucrc)
>> - xe_gt_WARN_ON(gt, xe_guc_pc_unset_gucrc_mode(>->uc.guc.pc));
>> + xe_gt_WARN_ON(gt, xe_guc_rc_unset_mode(>->uc.guc));
>> err_free_configs:
>> xe_oa_free_configs(stream);
>> exit:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-28 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-23 23:50 [PATCH v6 0/2] drm/xe: Separate out GuC RC code Vinay Belgaumkar
2026-01-23 23:50 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] drm/xe: Decouple GuC RC code from xe_guc_pc Vinay Belgaumkar
2026-01-27 23:18 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-01-23 23:50 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] drm/xe: Add a wrapper for set/unset params Vinay Belgaumkar
2026-01-27 3:15 ` Riana Tauro
2026-01-27 23:32 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-01-28 0:13 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay [this message]
2026-01-24 0:20 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Separate out GuC RC code (rev3) Patchwork
2026-01-24 0:21 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-01-24 8:22 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-01-22 23:20 [PATCH v6 0/2] drm/xe: Separate out GuC RC code Vinay Belgaumkar
2026-01-22 23:20 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] drm/xe: Add a wrapper for set/unset params Vinay Belgaumkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d515821e-0401-46f6-8e57-7aa419a16207@intel.com \
--to=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox