From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] drm/xe/sriov: Add support for enabling scheduler groups
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 19:59:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d53cee53-e649-4997-bede-3cdae61d9ebb@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251211015700.34266-18-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
On 12/11/2025 2:57 AM, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
> Scheduler groups are enabled by sending a specific policy configuration
> KLV to the GuC. We don't allow changing this policy if there are VF
> active, since the expectation is that the VF will only check if the
> feature is enabled during driver initialization.
>
> The functions added by this patch will be used by sysfs/debugfs, coming
> in follow up patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> ---
> v2: code improvements, add GUC_MAX_SCHED_GROUPS define, don't add
> XE_SRIOV_SCHED_GROUPS_NONE to supported_modes (Michal)
> v3: fix enum/integer mismatch, use GUC_MAX_SCHED_GROUPS to define the
> max KLV length and not the other way around
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_klvs_abi.h | 19 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.h | 3 +
> .../gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_types.h | 6 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_klv_helpers.c | 2 +
> 5 files changed, 181 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_klvs_abi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_klvs_abi.h
> index 265a135e7061..f0a87a1cb12f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_klvs_abi.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_klvs_abi.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
>
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> +#include "abi/guc_scheduler_abi.h"
> +
> /**
> * DOC: GuC KLV
> *
> @@ -200,6 +202,20 @@ enum {
> * :0: adverse events are not counted (default)
> * :n: sample period in milliseconds
> *
> + * _`GUC_KLV_VGT_POLICY_ENGINE_GROUP_CONFIG` : 0x8004
> + * This config allows the PF to split the engines across scheduling groups.
> + * Each group is independently timesliced across VFs, allowing different
> + * VFs to be active on the HW at the same time. When enabling this feature,
> + * all engines must be assigned to a group (and only one group), or they
> + * will be excluded from scheduling after this KLV is sent. To enable
> + * the groups, the driver must provide a masks array with
> + * GUC_MAX_ENGINE_CLASSES entries for each group, with each mask indicating
> + * which logical instances of that class belong to the group. Therefore,
> + * the length of this KLV when enabling groups is
> + * num_groups * GUC_MAX_ENGINE_CLASSES. To disable the groups, the driver
> + * must send the KLV without any payload (i.e. len = 0). The maximum
> + * number of groups is 8.
> + *
> * _`GUC_KLV_VGT_POLICY_RESET_AFTER_VF_SWITCH` : 0x8D00
> * This enum is to reset utilized HW engine after VF Switch (i.e to clean
> * up Stale HW register left behind by previous VF)
> @@ -214,6 +230,9 @@ enum {
> #define GUC_KLV_VGT_POLICY_ADVERSE_SAMPLE_PERIOD_KEY 0x8002
> #define GUC_KLV_VGT_POLICY_ADVERSE_SAMPLE_PERIOD_LEN 1u
>
> +#define GUC_KLV_VGT_POLICY_ENGINE_GROUP_CONFIG_KEY 0x8004
> +#define GUC_KLV_VGT_POLICY_ENGINE_GROUP_MAX_COUNT GUC_MAX_SCHED_GROUPS
nit: maybe we should still add LEN defines?
#define GUC_KLV_VGT_POLICY_ENGINE_GROUP_CONFIG_MIN_LEN 0
#define GUC_KLV_VGT_POLICY_ENGINE_GROUP_CONFIG_MAX_LEN \
(GUC_MAX_ENGINE_CLASSES * GUC_MAX_SCHED_GROUPS)
> +
> #define GUC_KLV_VGT_POLICY_RESET_AFTER_VF_SWITCH_KEY 0x8D00
> #define GUC_KLV_VGT_POLICY_RESET_AFTER_VF_SWITCH_LEN 1u
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.c
> index 003860661687..7738d515ea9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,23 @@ static int pf_push_policy_u32(struct xe_gt *gt, u16 key, u32 value)
> return pf_push_policy_klvs(gt, 1, klv, ARRAY_SIZE(klv));
> }
>
> +static int pf_push_policy_payload(struct xe_gt *gt, u16 key, void *payload, u32 num_dwords)
> +{
> + CLASS(xe_guc_buf, buf)(>->uc.guc.buf, GUC_KLV_LEN_MIN + num_dwords);
> + u32 *klv;
> +
> + if (!xe_guc_buf_is_valid(buf))
> + return -ENOBUFS;
> +
> + klv = xe_guc_buf_cpu_ptr(buf);
> +
> + klv[0] = PREP_GUC_KLV(key, num_dwords);
> + if (num_dwords)
> + memcpy(&klv[1], payload, num_dwords * sizeof(u32));
> +
> + return pf_push_policy_buf_klvs(gt, 1, buf, GUC_KLV_LEN_MIN + num_dwords);
> +}
> +
> static int pf_update_policy_bool(struct xe_gt *gt, u16 key, bool *policy, bool value)
> {
> int err;
> @@ -397,6 +414,17 @@ static void pf_sched_group_media_slices(struct xe_gt *gt, struct guc_sched_group
> if (group < 2)
> return;
>
> + /*
> + * If we have more groups than the GuC can support then we don't want to
> + * expose this specific mode, because the GuC will return an error if we
> + * try to enable it.
> + */
> + if (group > gt->sriov.pf.policy.guc.sched_groups.max_groups) {
> + xe_gt_sriov_notice(gt, "media_slice mode has too many groups: %u vs %u\n",
> + group, gt->sriov.pf.policy.guc.sched_groups.max_groups);
nit: is this something that could happen in production build on production platform?
maybe assert or dbg will be sufficient
> + return;
> + }
> +
> /* The GuC expects an array with a guc_sched_group entry for each group */
> values = drmm_kcalloc(>_to_xe(gt)->drm, group, sizeof(struct guc_sched_group),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -459,6 +487,15 @@ static void pf_init_sched_groups(struct xe_gt *gt)
> if (!xe_sriov_gt_pf_policy_has_sched_groups_support(gt))
> return;
>
> + /*
> + * The GuC interface supports up to 8 groups. However, the GuC only
> + * fully allocates resources for a subset of groups, based on the number
> + * of engines and expected usage. The plan is for this to become
> + * queryable via H2G, but for now GuC FW for all devices supports a
> + * maximum of 2 groups so we can just hardcode that.
> + */
> + gt->sriov.pf.policy.guc.sched_groups.max_groups = 2;
> +
> for (m = 0; m < XE_SRIOV_SCHED_GROUPS_MODES_COUNT; m++) {
> u32 *num_groups = >->sriov.pf.policy.guc.sched_groups.modes[m].num_groups;
> struct guc_sched_group **groups =
> @@ -478,14 +515,127 @@ static void pf_init_sched_groups(struct xe_gt *gt)
> }
>
> xe_gt_assert(gt, *num_groups < GUC_MAX_SCHED_GROUPS);
> +
> + if (*num_groups)
> + gt->sriov.pf.policy.guc.sched_groups.supported_modes |= BIT(m);
> }
> }
>
> +/**
> + * xe_sriov_gt_pf_policy_has_multi_group_modes() - check whether the GT supports
> + * any scheduler modes that have multiple groups
> + * @gt: the &xe_gt to check
> + *
> + * This function can only be called on PF.
> + *
> + * Return: true if the GT supports modes with multiple groups, false otherwise.
> + */
> +bool xe_sriov_gt_pf_policy_has_multi_group_modes(struct xe_gt *gt)
> +{
> + return gt->sriov.pf.policy.guc.sched_groups.supported_modes;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_sriov_gt_pf_policy_has_sched_group_mode() - check whether the GT supports
> + * a specific scheduler group mode
> + * @gt: the &xe_gt to check
> + * @mode: the mode to check
> + *
> + * This function can only be called on PF.
> + *
> + * Return: true if the GT supports the specified mode, false otherwise.
> + */
> +bool xe_sriov_gt_pf_policy_has_sched_group_mode(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 mode)
nit: shouldn't this 'mode' param be declared as enum xe_sriov_sched_group_modes ?
> +{
> + if (mode == XE_SRIOV_SCHED_GROUPS_DISABLED)
> + return true;
> +> + return gt->sriov.pf.policy.guc.sched_groups.supported_modes & BIT(mode);
> +}
> +
> +static int __pf_provision_sched_groups(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 mode)
> +{
> + struct guc_sched_group *groups = gt->sriov.pf.policy.guc.sched_groups.modes[mode].groups;
> + u32 num_groups = gt->sriov.pf.policy.guc.sched_groups.modes[mode].num_groups;
> +
> + return pf_push_policy_payload(gt, GUC_KLV_VGT_POLICY_ENGINE_GROUP_CONFIG_KEY,
> + groups, num_groups * GUC_MAX_ENGINE_CLASSES);
> +}
> +
> +static int pf_provision_sched_groups(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 mode)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + xe_gt_assert(gt, IS_SRIOV_PF(gt_to_xe(gt)));
> + lockdep_assert_held(xe_gt_sriov_pf_master_mutex(gt));
> +
> + if (!xe_sriov_gt_pf_policy_has_sched_group_mode(gt, mode))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* already in the desired mode */
> + if (gt->sriov.pf.policy.guc.sched_groups.current_mode == mode)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * We don't allow changing this with VFs active since it is hard for
> + * VFs to check.
> + */
> + if (xe_sriov_pf_num_vfs(gt_to_xe(gt)))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + err = __pf_provision_sched_groups(gt, mode);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + gt->sriov.pf.policy.guc.sched_groups.current_mode = mode;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pf_reprovision_sched_groups(struct xe_gt *gt)
> +{
> + xe_gt_assert(gt, IS_SRIOV_PF(gt_to_xe(gt)));
> + lockdep_assert_held(xe_gt_sriov_pf_master_mutex(gt));
> +
> + /* We only have something to provision if we have possible groups */
> + if (!xe_sriov_gt_pf_policy_has_multi_group_modes(gt))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return __pf_provision_sched_groups(gt, gt->sriov.pf.policy.guc.sched_groups.current_mode);
> +}
> +
> +static void pf_sanitize_sched_groups(struct xe_gt *gt)
> +{
> + xe_gt_assert(gt, IS_SRIOV_PF(gt_to_xe(gt)));
> + lockdep_assert_held(xe_gt_sriov_pf_master_mutex(gt));
> +
> + gt->sriov.pf.policy.guc.sched_groups.current_mode = XE_SRIOV_SCHED_GROUPS_DISABLED;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_set_sched_groups_mode() - Control the 'sched_groups' policy.
> + * @gt: the &xe_gt where to apply the policy
> + * @value: the sched_group mode to be activated
> + *
> + * This function can only be called on PF.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
> + */
> +int xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_set_sched_groups_mode(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 value)
> +{
> + if (!xe_sriov_gt_pf_policy_has_multi_group_modes(gt))
> + return -ENODEV;
nit: maybe at this point we could just assert and force the caller (debugfs) to check?
> +
> + guard(mutex)(xe_gt_sriov_pf_master_mutex(gt));
> + return pf_provision_sched_groups(gt, value);
> +}
> +
> static void pf_sanitize_guc_policies(struct xe_gt *gt)
> {
> pf_sanitize_sched_if_idle(gt);
> pf_sanitize_reset_engine(gt);
> pf_sanitize_sample_period(gt);
> + pf_sanitize_sched_groups(gt);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -524,6 +674,7 @@ int xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_reprovision(struct xe_gt *gt, bool reset)
> err |= pf_reprovision_sched_if_idle(gt);
> err |= pf_reprovision_reset_engine(gt);
> err |= pf_reprovision_sample_period(gt);
> + err |= pf_reprovision_sched_groups(gt);
> mutex_unlock(xe_gt_sriov_pf_master_mutex(gt));
>
> xe_pm_runtime_put(gt_to_xe(gt));
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.h
> index f5e3b2595063..d1b1fa9f0a09 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ bool xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_get_reset_engine(struct xe_gt *gt);
> int xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_set_sample_period(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 value);
> u32 xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_get_sample_period(struct xe_gt *gt);
> bool xe_sriov_gt_pf_policy_has_sched_groups_support(struct xe_gt *gt);
> +bool xe_sriov_gt_pf_policy_has_multi_group_modes(struct xe_gt *gt);
> +bool xe_sriov_gt_pf_policy_has_sched_group_mode(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 mode);
> +int xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_set_sched_groups_mode(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 value);
>
> void xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_init(struct xe_gt *gt);
> void xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_sanitize(struct xe_gt *gt);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_types.h
> index d228cadcd8b0..04015fb907ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_types.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ enum xe_sriov_sched_group_modes {
>
> /**
> * struct xe_gt_sriov_scheduler_groups - Scheduler groups policy info
> + * @max_groups: max number of groups supported by the GuC for the platform
> + * @supported_modes: mask of supported modes
> + * @current_mode: active scheduler groups mode
> * @modes: array of masks and their number for each mode
> * @modes.groups: array of engine instance groups in given mode, with each group
> * consisting of GUC_MAX_ENGINE_CLASSES engine instances masks. A
> @@ -33,6 +36,9 @@ enum xe_sriov_sched_group_modes {
> * are in the same group.
> */
> struct xe_gt_sriov_scheduler_groups {
> + u8 max_groups;
> + u32 supported_modes;
> + enum xe_sriov_sched_group_modes current_mode;
> struct {
> struct guc_sched_group *groups;
> u32 num_groups;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_klv_helpers.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_klv_helpers.c
> index 146a6eda9e06..1b08b443606e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_klv_helpers.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_klv_helpers.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ const char *xe_guc_klv_key_to_string(u16 key)
> return "sched_if_idle";
> case GUC_KLV_VGT_POLICY_ADVERSE_SAMPLE_PERIOD_KEY:
> return "sample_period";
> + case GUC_KLV_VGT_POLICY_ENGINE_GROUP_CONFIG_KEY:
> + return "engine_group_config";
> case GUC_KLV_VGT_POLICY_RESET_AFTER_VF_SWITCH_KEY:
> return "reset_engine";
> /* VF CFG keys */
again, just nits, so:
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-11 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-11 1:56 [PATCH v3 00/12] Introduce SRIOV scheduler groups Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-11 1:57 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] drm/xe/gt: Add engine masks for each class Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-11 18:19 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-11 1:57 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] drm/gt/guc: extract scheduler-related defines from guc_fwif.h Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-11 18:20 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-11 1:57 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] drm/xe/sriov: Initialize scheduler groups Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-11 18:52 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-11 22:55 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-11 1:57 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] drm/xe/sriov: Add support for enabling " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-11 18:59 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2025-12-11 23:00 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-11 1:57 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] drm/xe/sriov: Scheduler groups are incompatible with multi-lrc Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-11 19:05 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-11 1:57 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] drm/xe/sriov: Add handling for MLRC adverse event threshold Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-11 23:19 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-11 1:57 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] drm/xe/sriov: Add debugfs to enable scheduler groups Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-11 21:07 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-11 1:57 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] drm/xe/sriov: Add debugfs with scheduler groups information Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-11 22:40 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-11 22:44 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-11 1:57 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] drm/xe/sriov: Prep for multiple exec quantums and preemption timeouts Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-11 22:41 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-11 1:57 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] drm/xe/sriov: Add functions to set exec quantums for each group Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-11 22:47 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-11 1:57 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] drm/xe/sriov: Add functions to set preempt timeouts " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-11 22:49 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-11 1:57 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] drm/xe/sriov: Add debugfs to set EQ and PT for scheduler groups Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-11 23:07 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-11 2:31 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce SRIOV scheduler groups (rev3) Patchwork
2025-12-11 2:32 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-12-11 3:34 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-12-11 10:47 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d53cee53-e649-4997-bede-3cdae61d9ebb@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox