From: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Brost, Matthew" <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: "nirmoy.das@intel.com" <nirmoy.das@intel.com>,
"Kassabri, Farah" <farah.kassabri@intel.com>,
"Wajdeczko, Michal" <Michal.Wajdeczko@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] drm/xe: Add xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_done_handler
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 17:22:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d7493c11d2b2d0f4d3d9e1d71e2d88982d8cea92.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240708040331.766264-6-matthew.brost@intel.com>
On Sun, 2024-07-07 at 21:03 -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Decouple GT TLB seqno handling from G2H handler.
>
> v2:
> - Add kernel doc
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Looks good to me, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c | 47 +++++++++++++------
> --
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c
> index 9062d9f85ffb..2493ea91b637 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c
> @@ -412,27 +412,18 @@ int xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_vma(struct xe_gt
> *gt,
> }
>
> /**
> - * xe_guc_tlb_invalidation_done_handler - TLB invalidation done
> handler
> - * @guc: guc
> - * @msg: message indicating TLB invalidation done
> - * @len: length of message
> + * xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_done_handler - GT TLB invalidation done
> handler
> + * @gt: gt
> + * @seqno: seqno of invalidation that is done
> *
> - * Parse seqno of TLB invalidation, wake any waiters for seqno, and
> signal any
> - * invalidation fences for seqno. Algorithm for this depends on
> seqno being
> - * received in-order and asserts this assumption.
> - *
> - * Return: 0 on success, -EPROTO for malformed messages.
> + * Update recv seqno, signal any GT TLB invalidation fences, and
> restart TDR
> */
> -int xe_guc_tlb_invalidation_done_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32
> *msg, u32 len)
> +static void xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_done_handler(struct xe_gt *gt,
> int seqno)
> {
> - struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> struct xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence *fence, *next;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - if (unlikely(len != 1))
> - return -EPROTO;
> -
> /*
> * This can also be run both directly from the IRQ handler
> and also in
> * process_g2h_msg(). Only one may process any individual CT
> message,
> @@ -449,12 +440,12 @@ int xe_guc_tlb_invalidation_done_handler(struct
> xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg, u32 len)
> * process_g2h_msg().
> */
> spin_lock_irqsave(>->tlb_invalidation.pending_lock, flags);
> - if (tlb_invalidation_seqno_past(gt, msg[0])) {
> + if (tlb_invalidation_seqno_past(gt, seqno)) {
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(>-
> >tlb_invalidation.pending_lock, flags);
> - return 0;
> + return;
> }
>
> - WRITE_ONCE(gt->tlb_invalidation.seqno_recv, msg[0]);
> + WRITE_ONCE(gt->tlb_invalidation.seqno_recv, seqno);
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(fence, next,
> >-
> >tlb_invalidation.pending_fences, link) {
> @@ -474,6 +465,28 @@ int xe_guc_tlb_invalidation_done_handler(struct
> xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg, u32 len)
> cancel_delayed_work(>->tlb_invalidation.fence_tdr);
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(>->tlb_invalidation.pending_lock,
> flags);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_guc_tlb_invalidation_done_handler - TLB invalidation done
> handler
> + * @guc: guc
> + * @msg: message indicating TLB invalidation done
> + * @len: length of message
> + *
> + * Parse seqno of TLB invalidation, wake any waiters for seqno, and
> signal any
> + * invalidation fences for seqno. Algorithm for this depends on
> seqno being
> + * received in-order and asserts this assumption.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, -EPROTO for malformed messages.
> + */
> +int xe_guc_tlb_invalidation_done_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32
> *msg, u32 len)
> +{
> + struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> +
> + if (unlikely(len != 1))
> + return -EPROTO;
> +
> + xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_done_handler(gt, msg[0]);
>
> return 0;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-23 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-08 4:03 [PATCH v2 00/11] Proper GT TLB invalidation layering and new coalescing feature Matthew Brost
2024-07-08 4:03 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] drm/xe: Add xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence_init helper Matthew Brost
2024-07-09 15:56 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-07-08 4:03 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] drm/xe: Drop xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_wait Matthew Brost
2024-07-09 15:57 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-07-08 4:03 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] drm/xe: s/tlb_invalidation.lock/tlb_invalidation.fence_lock Matthew Brost
2024-07-09 15:57 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-07-08 4:03 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] drm/xe: Add tlb_invalidation.seqno_lock Matthew Brost
2024-07-08 4:03 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] drm/xe: Add xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_done_handler Matthew Brost
2025-07-23 17:22 ` Summers, Stuart [this message]
2024-07-08 4:03 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] drm/xe: Add send tlb invalidation helpers Matthew Brost
2024-07-08 4:03 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] drm/xe: Add xe_guc_tlb_invalidation layer Matthew Brost
2024-07-09 21:31 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-07-10 4:02 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-08 4:03 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] drm/xe: Add multi-client support for GT TLB invalidations Matthew Brost
2024-07-08 4:03 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] drm/xe: Add GT TLB invalidation coalescing Matthew Brost
2024-07-08 4:03 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] drm/xe: Add GT TLB invalidation coalesce tracepoints Matthew Brost
2024-07-08 4:03 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] drm/xe: Add GT TLB invalidation watermark debugfs Matthew Brost
2024-07-08 4:08 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Proper GT TLB invalidation layering and new coalescing feature. (rev2) Patchwork
2024-07-08 4:09 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-07-08 4:10 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-07-08 4:22 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-07-08 4:24 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-07-08 4:25 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-07-08 4:51 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-07-08 5:46 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-07-09 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] Proper GT TLB invalidation layering and new coalescing feature Matthew Auld
2024-07-09 16:08 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-07-09 16:35 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-09 16:42 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-07-09 21:23 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-09 16:31 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d7493c11d2b2d0f4d3d9e1d71e2d88982d8cea92.camel@intel.com \
--to=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=Michal.Wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=farah.kassabri@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox