Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Brost,  Matthew" <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: "nirmoy.das@intel.com" <nirmoy.das@intel.com>,
	"Kassabri, Farah" <farah.kassabri@intel.com>,
	"Wajdeczko, Michal" <Michal.Wajdeczko@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] drm/xe: Add xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_done_handler
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 17:22:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d7493c11d2b2d0f4d3d9e1d71e2d88982d8cea92.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240708040331.766264-6-matthew.brost@intel.com>

On Sun, 2024-07-07 at 21:03 -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Decouple GT TLB seqno handling from G2H handler.
> 
> v2:
>  - Add kernel doc
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>

Looks good to me, thanks!

Reviewed-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c | 47 +++++++++++++------
> --
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c
> index 9062d9f85ffb..2493ea91b637 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c
> @@ -412,27 +412,18 @@ int xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_vma(struct xe_gt
> *gt,
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * xe_guc_tlb_invalidation_done_handler - TLB invalidation done
> handler
> - * @guc: guc
> - * @msg: message indicating TLB invalidation done
> - * @len: length of message
> + * xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_done_handler - GT TLB invalidation done
> handler
> + * @gt: gt
> + * @seqno: seqno of invalidation that is done
>   *
> - * Parse seqno of TLB invalidation, wake any waiters for seqno, and
> signal any
> - * invalidation fences for seqno. Algorithm for this depends on
> seqno being
> - * received in-order and asserts this assumption.
> - *
> - * Return: 0 on success, -EPROTO for malformed messages.
> + * Update recv seqno, signal any GT TLB invalidation fences, and
> restart TDR
>   */
> -int xe_guc_tlb_invalidation_done_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32
> *msg, u32 len)
> +static void xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_done_handler(struct xe_gt *gt,
> int seqno)
>  {
> -       struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
>         struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
>         struct xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence *fence, *next;
>         unsigned long flags;
>  
> -       if (unlikely(len != 1))
> -               return -EPROTO;
> -
>         /*
>          * This can also be run both directly from the IRQ handler
> and also in
>          * process_g2h_msg(). Only one may process any individual CT
> message,
> @@ -449,12 +440,12 @@ int xe_guc_tlb_invalidation_done_handler(struct
> xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg, u32 len)
>          * process_g2h_msg().
>          */
>         spin_lock_irqsave(&gt->tlb_invalidation.pending_lock, flags);
> -       if (tlb_invalidation_seqno_past(gt, msg[0])) {
> +       if (tlb_invalidation_seqno_past(gt, seqno)) {
>                 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gt-
> >tlb_invalidation.pending_lock, flags);
> -               return 0;
> +               return;
>         }
>  
> -       WRITE_ONCE(gt->tlb_invalidation.seqno_recv, msg[0]);
> +       WRITE_ONCE(gt->tlb_invalidation.seqno_recv, seqno);
>  
>         list_for_each_entry_safe(fence, next,
>                                  &gt-
> >tlb_invalidation.pending_fences, link) {
> @@ -474,6 +465,28 @@ int xe_guc_tlb_invalidation_done_handler(struct
> xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg, u32 len)
>                 cancel_delayed_work(&gt->tlb_invalidation.fence_tdr);
>  
>         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gt->tlb_invalidation.pending_lock,
> flags);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_guc_tlb_invalidation_done_handler - TLB invalidation done
> handler
> + * @guc: guc
> + * @msg: message indicating TLB invalidation done
> + * @len: length of message
> + *
> + * Parse seqno of TLB invalidation, wake any waiters for seqno, and
> signal any
> + * invalidation fences for seqno. Algorithm for this depends on
> seqno being
> + * received in-order and asserts this assumption.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, -EPROTO for malformed messages.
> + */
> +int xe_guc_tlb_invalidation_done_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32
> *msg, u32 len)
> +{
> +       struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> +
> +       if (unlikely(len != 1))
> +               return -EPROTO;
> +
> +       xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_done_handler(gt, msg[0]);
>  
>         return 0;
>  }


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-23 17:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-08  4:03 [PATCH v2 00/11] Proper GT TLB invalidation layering and new coalescing feature Matthew Brost
2024-07-08  4:03 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] drm/xe: Add xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence_init helper Matthew Brost
2024-07-09 15:56   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-07-08  4:03 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] drm/xe: Drop xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_wait Matthew Brost
2024-07-09 15:57   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-07-08  4:03 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] drm/xe: s/tlb_invalidation.lock/tlb_invalidation.fence_lock Matthew Brost
2024-07-09 15:57   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-07-08  4:03 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] drm/xe: Add tlb_invalidation.seqno_lock Matthew Brost
2024-07-08  4:03 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] drm/xe: Add xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_done_handler Matthew Brost
2025-07-23 17:22   ` Summers, Stuart [this message]
2024-07-08  4:03 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] drm/xe: Add send tlb invalidation helpers Matthew Brost
2024-07-08  4:03 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] drm/xe: Add xe_guc_tlb_invalidation layer Matthew Brost
2024-07-09 21:31   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-07-10  4:02     ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-08  4:03 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] drm/xe: Add multi-client support for GT TLB invalidations Matthew Brost
2024-07-08  4:03 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] drm/xe: Add GT TLB invalidation coalescing Matthew Brost
2024-07-08  4:03 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] drm/xe: Add GT TLB invalidation coalesce tracepoints Matthew Brost
2024-07-08  4:03 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] drm/xe: Add GT TLB invalidation watermark debugfs Matthew Brost
2024-07-08  4:08 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Proper GT TLB invalidation layering and new coalescing feature. (rev2) Patchwork
2024-07-08  4:09 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-07-08  4:10 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-07-08  4:22 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-07-08  4:24 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-07-08  4:25 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-07-08  4:51 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-07-08  5:46 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-07-09  9:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] Proper GT TLB invalidation layering and new coalescing feature Matthew Auld
2024-07-09 16:08   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-07-09 16:35     ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-09 16:42       ` Nirmoy Das
2024-07-09 21:23         ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-09 16:31   ` Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d7493c11d2b2d0f4d3d9e1d71e2d88982d8cea92.camel@intel.com \
    --to=stuart.summers@intel.com \
    --cc=Michal.Wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=farah.kassabri@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox