Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Manna, Animesh" <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/alpm: Simplify and align LOBF checks in pre/post plane update
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 13:49:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8e65d354c42eb4241c75b3c0f6b0125b5f48b73.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251119135152.673276-5-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

On Wed, 2025-11-19 at 19:21 +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> The pre_plane_update and post_plane_update hooks essentially
> disable/enable lobf feature. Use the existing
> _is_enabling/is_disabling
> logic for this in the pre_plane_update and post_plane_update paths.
> 
> Also rename the helpers to intel_alpm_lobf_{en,dis}able().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c    | 45 ++++++------------
> --
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h    |  6 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 28 +++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> index 5cfb9345776a..abeb70fcf92c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> @@ -447,25 +447,17 @@ void intel_alpm_port_configure(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
>  	intel_de_write(display, PORT_ALPM_LFPS_CTL(port),
> lfps_ctl_val);
>  }
>  
> -void intel_alpm_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> -				 struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +void intel_alpm_lobf_disable(const struct intel_crtc_state
> *new_crtc_state)
>  {
> -	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(state);
> -	const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
> -		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> -	const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state =
> -		intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> -	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> +	struct intel_display *display =
> to_intel_display(new_crtc_state);
> +	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = new_crtc_state-
> >cpu_transcoder;
>  	struct intel_encoder *encoder;
>  
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 20)
>  		return;

You can remove this as well. intel_crtc_lobf_enabling is supposed to be
true only on display version >= 20.

>  
> -	if (crtc_state->has_lobf || crtc_state->has_lobf ==
> old_crtc_state->has_lobf)
> -		return;
> -
>  	for_each_intel_encoder_mask(display->drm, encoder,
> -				    crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask) {
> +				    new_crtc_state-
> >uapi.encoder_mask) {
>  		struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
>  
>  		if (!intel_encoder_is_dp(encoder))
> @@ -476,12 +468,10 @@ void intel_alpm_pre_plane_update(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state,
>  		if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		if (old_crtc_state->has_lobf) {
> -			mutex_lock(&intel_dp->alpm.lock);
> -			intel_de_write(display, ALPM_CTL(display,
> cpu_transcoder), 0);
> -			drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "Link off between
> frames (LOBF) disabled\n");
> -			mutex_unlock(&intel_dp->alpm.lock);
> -		}
> +		mutex_lock(&intel_dp->alpm.lock);
> +		intel_de_write(display, ALPM_CTL(display,
> cpu_transcoder), 0);
> +		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "Link off between frames
> (LOBF) disabled\n");
> +		mutex_unlock(&intel_dp->alpm.lock);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -502,22 +492,13 @@ void intel_alpm_enable_sink(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
>  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_RECEIVER_ALPM_CONFIG,
> val);
>  }
>  
> -void intel_alpm_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> -				  struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +void intel_alpm_lobf_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state
> *new_crtc_state)
>  {
> -	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(state);
> -	const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
> -		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> -	const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state =
> -		intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> +	struct intel_display *display =
> to_intel_display(new_crtc_state);
>  	struct intel_encoder *encoder;
>  
> -	if (crtc_state->has_psr || !crtc_state->has_lobf ||
> -	    crtc_state->has_lobf == old_crtc_state->has_lobf)
> -		return;
> -
>  	for_each_intel_encoder_mask(display->drm, encoder,
> -				    crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask) {
> +				    new_crtc_state-
> >uapi.encoder_mask) {
>  		struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
>  
>  		if (!intel_encoder_is_dp(encoder))
> @@ -526,8 +507,8 @@ void intel_alpm_post_plane_update(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state,
>  		intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
>  
>  		if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
> -			intel_alpm_enable_sink(intel_dp,
> crtc_state);
> -			intel_alpm_configure(intel_dp, crtc_state);
> +			intel_alpm_enable_sink(intel_dp,
> new_crtc_state);
> +			intel_alpm_configure(intel_dp,
> new_crtc_state);
>  		}
>  	}
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h
> index 14dc49fee4c3..0b2460b90465 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h
> @@ -25,12 +25,10 @@ void intel_alpm_configure(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
>  			  const struct intel_crtc_state
> *crtc_state);
>  void intel_alpm_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  			    const struct intel_crtc_state
> *crtc_state);
> -void intel_alpm_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> -				 struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> +void intel_alpm_lobf_disable(const struct intel_crtc_state
> *new_crtc_state);
>  void intel_alpm_port_configure(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  			       const struct intel_crtc_state
> *crtc_state);
> -void intel_alpm_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> -				  struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> +void intel_alpm_lobf_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state
> *new_crtc_state);
>  void intel_alpm_lobf_debugfs_add(struct intel_connector *connector);
>  bool intel_alpm_aux_wake_supported(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  bool intel_alpm_aux_less_wake_supported(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 069967114bd9..ecbdc506a1fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -1009,6 +1009,27 @@ static bool intel_casf_disabling(const struct
> intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
>  	return is_disabling(hw.casf_params.casf_enable,
> old_crtc_state, new_crtc_state);
>  }
>  
> +static bool intel_crtc_lobf_enabling(const struct intel_crtc_state
> *old_crtc_state,
> +				     const struct intel_crtc_state
> *new_crtc_state)
> +{
> +	if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active)
> +		return false;

Is it possible that new_crtc_state->hw.active == false &&
new_crtc_state->has_lobf == true
> +
> +	if (!new_crtc_state->has_psr)
> +		return false;

I don't understand why you are checking psr here? I should have been
checked already on compute phase?

> +
> +	return is_enabling(has_lobf, old_crtc_state,
> new_crtc_state);
> +}
> +
> +static bool intel_crtc_lobf_disabling(const struct intel_crtc_state
> *old_crtc_state,
> +				      const struct intel_crtc_state
> *new_crtc_state)
> +{
> +	if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active)
> +		return false;

No need to disable before everything else is disabled?

BR,

Jouni Högander

> +
> +	return is_disabling(has_lobf, old_crtc_state,
> new_crtc_state);
> +}
> +
>  #undef is_disabling
>  #undef is_enabling
>  
> @@ -1056,7 +1077,8 @@ static void intel_post_plane_update(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state,
>  			adl_scaler_ecc_unmask(new_crtc_state);
>  	}
>  
> -	intel_alpm_post_plane_update(state, crtc);
> +	if (intel_crtc_lobf_enabling(old_crtc_state,
> new_crtc_state))
> +		intel_alpm_lobf_enable(new_crtc_state);
>  
>  	intel_psr_post_plane_update(state, crtc);
>  }
> @@ -1153,7 +1175,9 @@ static void intel_pre_plane_update(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state,
>  		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
>  	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
>  
> -	intel_alpm_pre_plane_update(state, crtc);
> +	if (intel_crtc_lobf_disabling(old_crtc_state,
> new_crtc_state))
> +		intel_alpm_lobf_disable(new_crtc_state);
> +
>  	intel_psr_pre_plane_update(state, crtc);
>  
>  	if (intel_crtc_vrr_disabling(state, crtc)) {


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-17 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-19 13:51 [PATCH 0/5] LOBF fixes Ankit Nautiyal
2025-11-19 13:51 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/alpm: Compute LOBF late after guardband is already determined Ankit Nautiyal
2025-11-20  8:51   ` Michał Grzelak
2025-11-20 12:21     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-11-24  3:49   ` Ankit Nautiyal
2025-12-17 13:11   ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-12-24  8:46     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-02-04  6:23     ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-11-19 13:51 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/alpm: Allow LOBF only if window1 > alpm check_entry lines Ankit Nautiyal
2025-11-20  8:52   ` Michał Grzelak
2025-11-19 13:51 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/alpm: Allow LOBF only for platform that have Always on VRR TG Ankit Nautiyal
2025-11-20  8:52   ` Michał Grzelak
2025-11-19 13:51 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/alpm: Simplify and align LOBF checks in pre/post plane update Ankit Nautiyal
2025-11-20  8:52   ` Michał Grzelak
2025-12-17 13:49   ` Hogander, Jouni [this message]
2025-12-18  9:37     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-11-19 13:51 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/alpm: Disable LOBF around transitioning for LRR/seamless MN Ankit Nautiyal
2025-11-20  8:53   ` Michał Grzelak
2025-11-19 14:09 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for LOBF fixes (rev2) Patchwork
2025-11-19 14:11 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-19 14:26 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-11-19 15:11 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-11-19 17:26 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-11-25  1:14 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for LOBF fixes (rev3) Patchwork
2025-11-25  1:29 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-11-25  2:07 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-11-25  4:21 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-12-24  8:48 [PATCH 0/5] LOBF fixes Ankit Nautiyal
2025-12-24  8:48 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/alpm: Simplify and align LOBF checks in pre/post plane update Ankit Nautiyal
2025-11-14  5:27 [PATCH 0/5] LOBF fixes Ankit Nautiyal
2025-11-14  5:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/alpm: Simplify and align LOBF checks in pre/post plane update Ankit Nautiyal
2025-11-14 15:15   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-17  7:36     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d8e65d354c42eb4241c75b3c0f6b0125b5f48b73.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    --cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox