From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Simplify batch buffer allocation in emit_wa_job()
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:44:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <db53b846-d684-4356-a8d4-164ce3e40c8f@igalia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a5xk7rv2p5gr3tqlt6w7xwthchix4gvzddbrkmwwlxtlpa5cy7@3qhl5c67sbts>
On 27/06/2025 23:47, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 02:14:37PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> Code just needs a large enough buffer and it doesn't even check. Lets
>> therefore simplify to one allocation path which is guaranteed to be as
>> least as big as the current ones.
>
> In my stashed patches (not sent yet since they don't fix an LRC
> corruption we are chasing) I went the other way around:
>
> b1f0626cb3d3 o drm/xe/gt: Extract emit_job_sync()
> 979fe60f3883 o drm/xe: Count dwords before allocating
> 5dca40d2503f o drm/xe/lrc: Reduce scope of empty lrc data
> d892c8ac707a o drm/xe/lrc: Add table with LRC layout
>
> ... particularly the "Count dwords before allocating".
Sounds good from the titles. Carry on as planned. :)
Regards,
Tvrtko
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c | 9 ++-------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
>> index d397df056e4c..86018fee74d3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
>> @@ -190,13 +190,8 @@ static int emit_wa_job(struct xe_gt *gt, struct
>> xe_exec_queue *q)
>> int count_rmw = 0;
>> int count = 0;
>>
>> - if (q->hwe->class == XE_ENGINE_CLASS_RENDER)
>> - /* Big enough to emit all of the context's 3DSTATE */
>> - bb = xe_bb_new(gt, xe_gt_lrc_size(gt, q->hwe->class), false);
>> - else
>> - /* Just pick a large BB size */
>> - bb = xe_bb_new(gt, SZ_4K, false);
>> -
>> + /* Just pick a large BB size */
>> + bb = xe_bb_new(gt, xe_gt_lrc_size(gt, q->hwe->class), false);
>> if (IS_ERR(bb))
>> return PTR_ERR(bb);
>>
>> --
>> 2.48.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-30 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-27 13:14 [PATCH 0/2] Small emit_wa_job() tidy Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-06-27 13:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Simplify batch buffer allocation in emit_wa_job() Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-06-27 22:47 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-06-30 7:44 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2025-06-27 13:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Waste fewer instructions " Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-06-27 13:20 ` Raag Jadav
2025-06-30 13:39 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-06-30 14:12 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Small emit_wa_job() tidy Patchwork
2025-06-30 14:13 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-06-30 14:48 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-07-01 15:36 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=db53b846-d684-4356-a8d4-164ce3e40c8f@igalia.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox