Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915/power: convert intel_wakeref_t to struct ref_tracker *
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2025 14:25:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <df42724a6e39eec45cf126f175866e88b0b33f0d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20d6e9910f0a7faf3ed14e37db0ff0860a17e017.camel@coelho.fi>

On Mon, 01 Dec 2025, Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi> wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-11-25 at 15:24 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display_rpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display_rpm.c
>> index 340f65884812..9416ec784e39 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display_rpm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display_rpm.c
>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>>  
>>  #include "intel_display_core.h"
>>  #include "intel_display_rpm.h"
>> +#include "intel_wakeref.h"
>
> Just to be sure this is not a stray change, why did you add it here?

I was pretty sure it was required, maybe depending on some kconfig,
because the include is being removed in some other places, but I can't
reproduce the fail now.

I'd say not a huge problem because it's being removed in the next patch
no matter what.

BR,
Jani.


>
>
>>  #include "xe_device.h"
>>  #include "xe_device_types.h"
>>  #include "xe_pm.h"
>
> Regardless:
>
> Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Luca.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-01 12:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-25 13:24 [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/i915/display: switch from intel_wakeref_t to struct ref_tracker * Jani Nikula
2025-11-25 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915/pps: drop wakeref parameter from with_intel_pps_lock() Jani Nikula
2025-12-01  8:06   ` Luca Coelho
2025-11-25 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915/pps: convert intel_wakeref_t to struct ref_tracker * Jani Nikula
2025-12-01  8:09   ` Luca Coelho
2025-11-25 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915/power: drop wakeref parameter from with_intel_display_power*() Jani Nikula
2025-12-01  8:11   ` Luca Coelho
2025-11-25 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915/power: convert intel_wakeref_t to struct ref_tracker * Jani Nikula
2025-12-01  8:15   ` Luca Coelho
2025-12-01 12:25     ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-12-01 12:28       ` Luca Coelho
2025-12-01 13:38         ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-25 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/{i915,xe}/display: drop intel_wakeref.h usage Jani Nikula
2025-12-01  8:17   ` Luca Coelho
2025-11-25 20:07 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/i915/display: switch from intel_wakeref_t to struct ref_tracker * (rev2) Patchwork
2025-11-25 20:09 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-25 20:24 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-11-25 20:49 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-11-25 23:24 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=df42724a6e39eec45cf126f175866e88b0b33f0d@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=luca@coelho.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox