From: "Purkait, Soham" <soham.purkait@intel.com>
To: Karthik Poosa <karthik.poosa@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
<badal.nilawar@intel.com>, <raag.jadav@intel.com>,
<riana.tauro@intel.com>, <sk.anirban@intel.com>,
<mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] drm/xe/hwmon: Update fan info after late binding
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 11:50:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e61ad993-aee9-42ca-ae19-b777e94d197d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717041757.2759084-10-karthik.poosa@intel.com>
Hi Karthik,
On 17-07-2026 09:47, Karthik Poosa wrote:
> Add xe_hwmon_fan_update_post_lb() to update fan info after late binding.
> Add param is_init into xe_hwmon_read_fan_control_info() to avoid
> resetting user pwm mode post-LB.
> Call init path with is_init=true from preregistration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Karthik Poosa <karthik.poosa@intel.com>
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5-3
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c | 3 ++
> 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> index 65f356c741f5..518ba4438de4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> @@ -1848,7 +1848,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group hwmon_curve_attrgroup = {
> .is_visible = xe_hwmon_curve_attributes_visible,
> };
>
> -static int xe_hwmon_read_fan_control_info(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon)
> +static int xe_hwmon_read_fan_control_info(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, bool is_init)
> {
> struct xe_tile *root_tile = xe_device_get_root_tile(hwmon->xe);
> int point;
> @@ -1901,8 +1901,13 @@ static int xe_hwmon_read_fan_control_info(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon)
> fi->fan_table[STOCK_FAN_TABLE].fcp[point].speed);
> }
>
> - /* Set PWM enable mode to automatic i.e stock table in use. */
> - fi->pwm_enable_mode = XE_FAN_PWM_AUTO_STOCK_TABLE;
> + /*
> + * Set PWM enable mode to automatic i.e stock table in use, only during init.
> + * For late binding, the mode is already set by the user and should not be
> + * overridden.
> + */
> + if (is_init)
> + fi->pwm_enable_mode = XE_FAN_PWM_AUTO_STOCK_TABLE;
>
> /* Read minimum fan PWM */
> ret = xe_hwmon_pcode_read_fan_control(hwmon, FSC_READ_FAN_MIN_PWM, fan,
> @@ -2737,7 +2742,7 @@ xe_hwmon_get_preregistration_info(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon)
> xe_hwmon_fan_input_read(hwmon, channel, &fan_speed);
>
> /* Fan control tables initialization */
> - if (xe_hwmon_read_fan_control_info(hwmon))
> + if (xe_hwmon_read_fan_control_info(hwmon, true))
> xe_warn(hwmon->xe, "Fan control tables are not available\n");
> }
>
> @@ -2918,4 +2923,41 @@ void xe_hwmon_resume(struct xe_device *xe)
> mutex_unlock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * xe_hwmon_fan_update_post_lb - Update fan info after late binding
> + * @xe: xe device instance
> + *
> + * This function reads the number of fans and their stock table after late binding.
> + */
> +void xe_hwmon_fan_update_post_lb(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + struct xe_hwmon *hwmon = xe->hwmon;
> + int fan;
> + int num_fans;
Should this be u32 / u8?
> +
> + if (!hwmon || !xe->info.has_fan_control)
> + return;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
> +
> + /* Read number of fans */
> + if (xe_hwmon_get_num_fans(hwmon, &num_fans)) {
> + xe_warn(hwmon->xe, "Failed to read number of fans after LB\n");
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> + hwmon->num_fans = num_fans;
Check the types to avoid type mismatch.
> + xe_dbg(hwmon->xe, "Number of fans detected after LB: %u\n", hwmon->num_fans);
> +
> + /* Read stock table */
> + for (fan = 0; fan < hwmon->num_fans; fan++) {
This loop seems redundant. xe_hwmon_read_fan_control_info() already has
this.
> + if (xe_hwmon_read_fan_control_info(hwmon, false)) {
> + xe_warn(hwmon->xe, "Failed to read fan %d stock table after LB\n", fan);
> + continue;
> + }
> + }
> +
> +unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
> +}
> +
> MODULE_IMPORT_NS("INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY");
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.h
> index 6c6f30208508..7198d7a4a1be 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.h
> @@ -14,10 +14,12 @@ struct xe_device;
> int xe_hwmon_register(struct xe_device *xe);
> void xe_hwmon_suspend(struct xe_device *xe);
> void xe_hwmon_resume(struct xe_device *xe);
> +void xe_hwmon_fan_update_post_lb(struct xe_device *xe);
> #else
> static inline int xe_hwmon_register(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; };
> static inline void xe_hwmon_suspend(struct xe_device *xe) {}
> static inline void xe_hwmon_resume(struct xe_device *xe) {}
> +static inline void xe_hwmon_fan_update_post_lb(struct xe_device *xe) {}
> #endif
>
> #endif /* _XE_HWMON_H_ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c
> index 768442ca7da6..34295418ef50 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <drm/drm_print.h>
>
> #include "xe_device.h"
> +#include "xe_hwmon.h"
> #include "xe_late_bind_fw.h"
> #include "xe_pcode.h"
> #include "xe_pcode_api.h"
> @@ -252,6 +253,8 @@ static void xe_late_bind_work(struct work_struct *work)
> if (!ret) {
> drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "Load %s firmware successful\n",
> fw_id_to_name[lbfw->id]);
> + if (fw_id_to_name[lbfw->id] == XE_LB_FW_FAN_CONTROL)
Comparing a 'const char *' to an enum (0). Should this be : if (lbfw->id
== XE_LB_FW_FAN_CONTROL) ?
Thanks,
soham
> + xe_hwmon_fan_update_post_lb(late_bind_to_xe(late_bind));
> goto out;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 4:17 [PATCH v2 0/9] Add fan control support Karthik Poosa
2026-07-17 4:16 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Add fan control support (rev2) Patchwork
2026-07-17 4:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] drm/xe/pcode: Introduce xe_pcode_read_timeout() API Karthik Poosa
2026-07-17 4:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/xe/hwmon: initialize fan-control backend and table cache Karthik Poosa
2026-08-10 6:03 ` Nilawar, Badal
2026-08-11 13:11 ` Nilawar, Badal
2026-07-17 4:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/xe/hwmon: expose fanN_max Karthik Poosa
2026-07-23 5:34 ` Purkait, Soham
2026-07-17 4:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/xe/hwmon: expose pwm[1-3] Karthik Poosa
2026-07-24 7:02 ` Purkait, Soham
2026-08-11 13:58 ` Poosa, Karthik
2026-07-17 4:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/xe/hwmon: expose pwm[1-3]_enable Karthik Poosa
2026-07-17 4:17 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/xe/hwmon: Enable fan curve control support Karthik Poosa
2026-07-22 18:16 ` Purkait, Soham
2026-07-17 4:17 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] drm/xe/hwmon: Add kernel-doc for fan control Karthik Poosa
2026-07-17 4:17 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] drm/xe/hwmon: preserve fan user table across suspend resume Karthik Poosa
2026-08-10 5:53 ` Nilawar, Badal
2026-07-17 4:17 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] drm/xe/hwmon: Update fan info after late binding Karthik Poosa
2026-07-20 6:20 ` Purkait, Soham [this message]
2026-07-17 5:00 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for Add fan control support (rev2) Patchwork
2026-07-17 8:18 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e61ad993-aee9-42ca-ae19-b777e94d197d@intel.com \
--to=soham.purkait@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=karthik.poosa@intel.com \
--cc=mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=sk.anirban@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox