From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "drm/i915/dp: change aux_ctl reg read to polling read"
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 14:09:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e690c30b58fa1343c7847716a01e9f0c57f58f72@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251119185310.10428-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 19 Nov 2025, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> This reverts commit 5a9b0c7418448ed3766f61ba0a71d08f259c3181.
>
> The switch from AUX interrupts to pollign was very hand-wavy.
> Yes, there have been some situations in CI on a few platforms
> where the AUX hardware seemingly forgets to signal the timeout,
> but those have been happening after we switched to polling as
> well. So I don't think we have any conclusive evidence that
> polling actually helps here.
>
> Someone really should root cause the actual problem, and see
> if there is a proper workaround we could implemnt (eg. disabling
> clock gating/etc.). In the meantime just go back to using the
> interrupt for AUX completion.
>
> If the hardware fails to signal the timeout we will just hit
> the wait_event_timeout() software timeout instead. I suppose
> we could try to tune the software timeout to more closely
> match the expected hardware timeout. Might need to use
> wait_event_hrtimeout() or something to avoid jiffies
> granularity issues...
>
> The AUX polling is also a hinderance towards using poll_timeout_us()
> because we have a very long timeout, but would need a fairly short
> polling interval to keep AUX transfer reasonably fast. Someone would
> need to come up with good numbers in a somewhat scientific way.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> index 809799f63e32..d1a93e4a59b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include <drm/drm_print.h>
>
> #include "intel_de.h"
> +#include "intel_display_jiffies.h"
> #include "intel_display_types.h"
> #include "intel_display_utils.h"
> #include "intel_dp.h"
> @@ -60,16 +61,17 @@ intel_dp_aux_wait_done(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> i915_reg_t ch_ctl = intel_dp->aux_ch_ctl_reg(intel_dp);
> const unsigned int timeout_ms = 10;
> u32 status;
> - int ret;
> + bool done;
>
> - ret = intel_de_wait_ms(display, ch_ctl,
> - DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SEND_BUSY, 0,
> - timeout_ms, &status);
> +#define C (((status = intel_de_read_notrace(display, ch_ctl)) & DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SEND_BUSY) == 0)
> + done = wait_event_timeout(display->gmbus.wait_queue, C,
> + msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(timeout_ms));
>
> - if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
> + if (!done)
> drm_err(display->drm,
> "%s: did not complete or timeout within %ums (status 0x%08x)\n",
> intel_dp->aux.name, timeout_ms, status);
> +#undef C
>
> return status;
> }
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-24 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-19 18:53 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: Go back to using AUX interrupts Ville Syrjala
2025-11-19 18:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Enable DDI A/B AUX interrupts on LNL+ Ville Syrjala
2025-11-24 12:09 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-19 18:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] Revert "drm/i915/dp: change aux_ctl reg read to polling read" Ville Syrjala
2025-11-20 3:40 ` Murthy, Arun R
2025-11-20 13:08 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-20 14:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-24 12:09 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-11-19 20:24 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/i915: Go back to using AUX interrupts Patchwork
2025-11-19 20:46 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-11-19 21:40 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-11-20 1:35 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e690c30b58fa1343c7847716a01e9f0c57f58f72@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox