From: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] drm/xe: Move survivability entirely to xe_pci
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:11:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8538806-06ce-47cf-8fe0-160a364bd43d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dgd4urucgypp7u6nqgjwacm3exeijvlsvuroq5iyxhk4hguxyc@xiu3pogry77w>
Hi Lucas
On 2/17/2025 10:58 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 10:56:22AM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/15/2025 2:53 AM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>>> There's an odd split between xe_pci.c and xe_device.c wrt
>>> xe_survivability: it's initialized by xe_device, but then finalized by
>>> xe_pci. Move it entirely to the outer layer, xe_pci, so it controls
>>> the flow entirely.
>> Hi Lucas
>>
>> device_probe_early has other init calls that return error. And since
>> this occurs only when pcode probe fails, added it there.
>
> right, but it's very confusing to have this flow with both xe_pci and
> xe_device playing a different role on init and fini.
>
>>
>> I hadn't added the fini in the devm_action because of the
>> pci_set_drvdata.
>
> which is now fixed as a prep patch in this series.
>
>>
>> As, the remove function is moved to devm_action. IMO it would be better
>> if survivability_init stays in the err condition of pcode probe
>> because if someone decides to move pcode_probe to some other function,
>> it would be intuitive to move this too
>
> but from entering survivability mode, it would still be after
> xe_device_probe_**early**().
>
> An **early** error in xe_device probe, by means of having a call
> xe_device_probe_early() means a very fundamental issue with firmware and
> we'd better enter a mode that allows us to recover from that. If the
> call to pcode was moved somewhere else after that, it's mistake that we
> should fail in CI (btw we need a way to do that in CI).
Currently there is no CI for this as it needs a firmware failure. Even
if module param was added in the future it would still not fail if pcode
probe was moved.
Maybe can add a comment on top of the survivability_mode_enable in pci layer
>
> The only thing in between right now is the "wait for lmem", which I
> think is ok to have and still check for the "do we need to enter
> survivability mode and abort the normal probe?" after it.
Yeah this should be okay
Thanks
Riana
>
> This allows to fix things like mentioned below and make it easier to
> keep it working.
>
> Lucas De Marchi
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Riana
>>>
>>> This also allows to stop ignoring some of the errors. E.g.: if there's
>>> an -ENOMEM, it shouldn't continue as if it survivability had been
>>> enabled.
>>>
>>> One change worth mentioning is that if "wait for lmem" fails, it will
>>> also check the pcode status to decide if it should enter or not in
>>> survivability mode, which it was not doing before. The bit from pcode
>>> for that decision should remain the same after lmem failed
>>> initialization, so it should be fine.
>>>
>>> Cc: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 7 +--
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_heci_gsc.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c | 16 ++---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.c | 73 +++++++++++-----------
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.h | 5 +-
>>> 5 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/
>>> xe_device.c
>>> index d88c0fddf0680..782ad564d0ba4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>> @@ -53,7 +53,6 @@
>>> #include "xe_pxp.h"
>>> #include "xe_query.h"
>>> #include "xe_sriov.h"
>>> -#include "xe_survivability_mode.h"
>>> #include "xe_tile.h"
>>> #include "xe_ttm_stolen_mgr.h"
>>> #include "xe_ttm_sys_mgr.h"
>>> @@ -695,12 +694,8 @@ int xe_device_probe_early(struct xe_device *xe)
>>> update_device_info(xe);
>>> err = xe_pcode_probe_early(xe);
>>> - if (err) {
>>> - if (xe_survivability_mode_required(xe))
>>> - xe_survivability_mode_init(xe);
>>> -
>>> + if (err)
>>> return err;
>>> - }
>>> err = wait_for_lmem_ready(xe);
>>> if (err)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_heci_gsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/
>>> xe_heci_gsc.c
>>> index 06dc78d3a8123..992ee47abcdb7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_heci_gsc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_heci_gsc.c
>>> @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ void xe_heci_gsc_init(struct xe_device *xe)
>>> return;
>>> }
>>> - if (!def->use_polling && !xe_survivability_mode_enabled(xe)) {
>>> + if (!def->use_polling && !xe_survivability_mode_is_enabled(xe)) {
>>> ret = heci_gsc_irq_setup(xe);
>>> if (ret)
>>> goto fail;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>>> index 447eacb355d7c..c18c58447d9fe 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>>> @@ -775,8 +775,8 @@ static void xe_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>> if (IS_SRIOV_PF(xe))
>>> xe_pci_sriov_configure(pdev, 0);
>>> - if (xe_survivability_mode_enabled(xe))
>>> - return xe_survivability_mode_remove(xe);
>>> + if (xe_survivability_mode_is_enabled(xe))
>>> + return;
>>> xe_device_remove(xe);
>>> xe_pm_runtime_fini(xe);
>>> @@ -851,13 +851,13 @@ static int xe_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>> const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>>> err = xe_device_probe_early(xe);
>>> /*
>>> - * In Boot Survivability mode, no drm card is exposed
>>> - * and driver is loaded with bare minimum to allow
>>> - * for firmware to be flashed through mei. Return
>>> - * success if survivability mode is enabled.
>>> + * In Boot Survivability mode, no drm card is exposed and driver is
>>> + * loaded with bare minimum to allow for firmware to be flashed
>>> through
>>> + * mei. Return success if survivability mode is enabled.
>>> */
>>> if (err) {
>>> - if (xe_survivability_mode_enabled(xe))
>>> + if (xe_survivability_mode_required(xe) &&
>>> + xe_survivability_mode_enable(xe))
>>> return 0;
>>> return err;
>>> @@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ static int xe_pci_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>> struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
>>> int err;
>>> - if (xe_survivability_mode_enabled(xe))
>>> + if (xe_survivability_mode_is_enabled(xe))
>>> return -EBUSY;
>>> err = xe_pm_suspend(xe);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.c b/drivers/
>>> gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.c
>>> index 04a341606a7c5..7ba02e085b5b1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.c
>>> @@ -127,40 +127,54 @@ static ssize_t survivability_mode_show(struct
>>> device *dev,
>>> static DEVICE_ATTR_ADMIN_RO(survivability_mode);
>>> -static void enable_survivability_mode(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>> +static void xe_survivability_mode_fini(void *arg)
>>> +{
>>> + struct xe_device *xe = arg;
>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev);
>>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> +
>>> + sysfs_remove_file(&dev->kobj, &dev_attr_survivability_mode.attr);
>>> + xe_heci_gsc_fini(xe);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int enable_survivability_mode(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>> {
>>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
>>> struct xe_survivability *survivability = &xe->survivability;
>>> int ret = 0;
>>> - /* set survivability mode */
>>> - survivability->mode = true;
>>> - dev_info(dev, "In Survivability Mode\n");
>>> -
>>> /* create survivability mode sysfs */
>>> ret = sysfs_create_file(&dev->kobj,
>>> &dev_attr_survivability_mode.attr);
>>> if (ret) {
>>> dev_warn(dev, "Failed to create survivability sysfs files\n");
>>> - return;
>>> + return ret;
>>> }
>>> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev,
>>> + xe_survivability_mode_fini, xe);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> xe_heci_gsc_init(xe);
>>> xe_vsec_init(xe);
>>> +
>>> + survivability->mode = true;
>>> + dev_err(dev, "In Survivability Mode\n");
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> }
>>> /**
>>> - * xe_survivability_mode_enabled - check if survivability mode is
>>> enabled
>>> + * xe_survivability_mode_is_enabled - check if survivability mode is
>>> enabled
>>> * @xe: xe device instance
>>> *
>>> * Returns true if in survivability mode, false otherwise
>>> */
>>> -bool xe_survivability_mode_enabled(struct xe_device *xe)
>>> +bool xe_survivability_mode_is_enabled(struct xe_device *xe)
>>> {
>>> - struct xe_survivability *survivability = &xe->survivability;
>>> -
>>> - return survivability->mode;
>>> + return xe->survivability.mode;
>>> }
>>> /**
>>> @@ -183,34 +197,19 @@ bool xe_survivability_mode_required(struct
>>> xe_device *xe)
>>> data = xe_mmio_read32(mmio, PCODE_SCRATCH(0));
>>> survivability->boot_status = REG_FIELD_GET(BOOT_STATUS, data);
>>> - return (survivability->boot_status == NON_CRITICAL_FAILURE ||
>>> - survivability->boot_status == CRITICAL_FAILURE);
>>> + return survivability->boot_status == NON_CRITICAL_FAILURE ||
>>> + survivability->boot_status == CRITICAL_FAILURE;
>>> }
>>> /**
>>> - * xe_survivability_mode_remove - remove survivability mode
>>> + * xe_survivability_mode_enable - Initialize and enable the
>>> survivability mode
>>> * @xe: xe device instance
>>> *
>>> - * clean up sysfs entries of survivability mode
>>> - */
>>> -void xe_survivability_mode_remove(struct xe_device *xe)
>>> -{
>>> - struct xe_survivability *survivability = &xe->survivability;
>>> - struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev);
>>> - struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> -
>>> - sysfs_remove_file(&dev->kobj, &dev_attr_survivability_mode.attr);
>>> - xe_heci_gsc_fini(xe);
>>> - kfree(survivability->info);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -/**
>>> - * xe_survivability_mode_init - Initialize the survivability mode
>>> - * @xe: xe device instance
>>> + * Initialize survivability information and enable survivability mode
>>> *
>>> - * Initializes survivability information and enables survivability mode
>>> + * Return: 0 for success, negative error code otherwise.
>>> */
>>> -void xe_survivability_mode_init(struct xe_device *xe)
>>> +int xe_survivability_mode_enable(struct xe_device *xe)
>>> {
>>> struct xe_survivability *survivability = &xe->survivability;
>>> struct xe_survivability_info *info;
>>> @@ -218,9 +217,10 @@ void xe_survivability_mode_init(struct xe_device
>>> *xe)
>>> survivability->size = MAX_SCRATCH_MMIO;
>>> - info = kcalloc(survivability->size, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + info = devm_kcalloc(xe->drm.dev, survivability->size,
>>> sizeof(*info),
>>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>>> if (!info)
>>> - return;
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> survivability->info = info;
>>> @@ -229,9 +229,8 @@ void xe_survivability_mode_init(struct xe_device
>>> *xe)
>>> /* Only log debug information and exit if it is a critical
>>> failure */
>>> if (survivability->boot_status == CRITICAL_FAILURE) {
>>> log_survivability_info(pdev);
>>> - kfree(survivability->info);
>>> - return;
>>> + return -ENXIO;
>>> }
>>> - enable_survivability_mode(pdev);
>>> + return enable_survivability_mode(pdev);
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.h b/drivers/
>>> gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.h
>>> index f530507a22c62..f4df5f9025ce8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.h
>>> @@ -10,9 +10,8 @@
>>> struct xe_device;
>>> -void xe_survivability_mode_init(struct xe_device *xe);
>>> -void xe_survivability_mode_remove(struct xe_device *xe);
>>> -bool xe_survivability_mode_enabled(struct xe_device *xe);
>>> +int xe_survivability_mode_enable(struct xe_device *xe);
>>> +bool xe_survivability_mode_is_enabled(struct xe_device *xe);
>>> bool xe_survivability_mode_required(struct xe_device *xe);
>>> #endif /* _XE_SURVIVABILITY_MODE_H_ */
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-20 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-14 21:23 [PATCH 0/9] Cleanup error handling on probe, batch 2 Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-14 21:23 ` [PATCH 1/9] FOR-CI-ONLY: devres Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-14 21:23 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/xe: Stop setting drvdata to NULL Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-14 22:18 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-02-14 21:23 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/xe: Switch from xe to devm actions Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-14 22:18 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-02-21 22:44 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-17 12:55 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2025-02-14 21:23 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/xe: Drop remove callback support Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-14 22:19 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-02-14 21:23 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/xe/display: Drop xe_display_driver_remove() Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-14 22:19 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-02-21 22:48 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-21 23:53 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-02-14 21:23 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/xe: Move survivability entirely to xe_pci Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-14 22:19 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-02-17 5:26 ` Riana Tauro
2025-02-17 17:03 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-17 17:28 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-20 5:41 ` Riana Tauro [this message]
2025-02-21 23:12 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-14 21:23 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/xe: Stop ignoring errors from xe_heci_gsc_init() Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-14 22:20 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-02-14 21:23 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/xe: Rename update_device_info() after sriov Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-14 22:20 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-02-14 21:23 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/xe: Stop ignoring errors from xe_ttm_sys_mgr_init() Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-14 22:20 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-02-17 12:43 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2025-02-14 21:51 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Cleanup error handling on probe, batch 2 Patchwork
2025-02-14 21:51 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-14 21:53 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-02-14 22:09 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-14 22:11 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-14 22:13 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-02-14 22:33 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-15 22:59 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e8538806-06ce-47cf-8fe0-160a364bd43d@intel.com \
--to=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox