From: "Ghimiray, Himal Prasad" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, <stuart.summers@intel.com>,
<arvind.yadav@intel.com>, <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 01/15] drm/xe: Add xe_usm_queue generic USM circular buffer
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 10:16:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eaf6627b-2689-4c07-9dca-7d7ee575d517@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac2N7WrbfaInoIjk@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com>
On 02-04-2026 02:58, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 01:14:42PM +0530, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
>> Introduce struct xe_usm_queue, a generic lock-protected circular FIFO
>> used by USM consumers (page fault, access counter) to receive fixed-size
>> entries from IRQ context and process them via a work_struct.
>>
>> Provide three inline helpers in xe_usm_queue.h:
>> xe_usm_queue_full() - CIRC_SPACE check (caller holds lock)
>> xe_usm_queue_pop() - dequeue one entry (acquires lock internally)
>> xe_usm_queue_push() - enqueue one entry (caller holds lock)
>>
>> Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
>
> I think this is useful, but right after I suggested it, I changed the
> semantics of the page-fault circular buffer to be a single buffer [1]
> that multiple workers pull from. This eliminates HoQ blocking (e.g.,
> five access events are pushed; the first one takes a really long time,
> but the other four are much faster—yet the fifth event gets stuck behind
> the long-running one). So maybe start with a single-queue +
> multiple-workers-pulling design here? This likely matters considerably
> less than the page-fault cases, but overall I think it’s a better
> structure.
>
> Also, maybe the xe_usm_queue can be reused by page faults, but the
> management of that queue actually gets more convoluted in [2] to
> implement the page-fault cache that greatly speeds up storms of faults.
> So maybe drop the second patch in the series for now to avoid conflicts,
> and if we can converge on a shared xe_usm_queue implementation later,
> great..
Sure will change this implementation to support 1 queue : N worker, and
will drop patch 2.
Thanks
>
> Matt
>
> [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/707293/?series=162167&rev=4
> [2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/707300/?series=162167&rev=4
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_usm_queue.h | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 100 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_usm_queue.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_usm_queue.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_usm_queue.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..5dc2d692d8bb
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_usm_queue.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright © 2026 Intel Corporation
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef _XE_USM_QUEUE_H_
>> +#define _XE_USM_QUEUE_H_
>> +
>> +#include <linux/circ_buf.h>
>> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
>> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct xe_usm_queue - Generic USM circular FIFO queue
>> + *
>> + * A lock-protected circular buffer used by both the page fault consumer and
>> + * the access counter consumer. Producers push fixed-size entries from IRQ
>> + * context; a work_struct processes them asynchronously.
>> + */
>> +struct xe_usm_queue {
>> + /**
>> + * @data: Raw byte buffer backing the queue, protected by @lock
>> + */
>> + void *data;
>> + /** @size: Total size of @data in bytes */
>> + u32 size;
>> + /** @head: Write cursor in bytes, moved by producer, protected by @lock */
>> + u32 head;
>> + /** @tail: Read cursor in bytes, moved by consumer, protected by @lock */
>> + u32 tail;
>> + /** @lock: Protects the queue head/tail */
>> + spinlock_t lock;
>> + /** @worker: Work item scheduled to drain the queue */
>> + struct work_struct worker;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * xe_usm_queue_full - Check whether the queue has no room for one more entry
>> + * @q: queue
>> + * @size: exact size of one entry in bytes (sizeof the entry struct)
>> + *
>> + * Must be called with @q->lock held.
>> + *
>> + * Return: true if the queue is full
>> + */
>> +static inline bool xe_usm_queue_full(struct xe_usm_queue *q, u32 size)
>> +{
>> + u32 entry_size = roundup_pow_of_two(size);
>> +
>> + lockdep_assert_held(&q->lock);
>> +
>> + return CIRC_SPACE(q->head, q->tail, q->size) <= entry_size;
>> +}
>> +/**
>> + * xe_usm_queue_pop - Pop one entry from the queue into @out
>> + * @q: queue
>> + * @out: destination buffer, must be at least @size bytes
>> + * @size: exact size of one entry in bytes (sizeof the entry struct)
>> + *
>> + * Acquires @q->lock internally with spin_lock_irq().
>> + *
>> + * Return: true if an entry was dequeued, false if the queue was empty
>> + */
>> +static inline bool xe_usm_queue_pop(struct xe_usm_queue *q, void *out,
>> + u32 size)
>> +{
>> + u32 entry_size = roundup_pow_of_two(size);
>> + bool found = false;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irq(&q->lock);
>> + if (q->tail != q->head) {
>> + memcpy(out, q->data + q->tail, size);
>> + q->tail = (q->tail + entry_size) % q->size;
>> + found = true;
>> + }
>> + spin_unlock_irq(&q->lock);
>> +
>> + return found;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * xe_usm_queue_push - Push one entry into the queue
>> + * @q: queue
>> + * @in: source buffer, must be at least @size bytes
>> + * @size: size of one entry of in bytes
>> + *
>> + * Must be called with @q->lock held.
>> + * Caller must check xe_usm_queue_full() before calling.
>> + */
>> +static inline void xe_usm_queue_push(struct xe_usm_queue *q, const void *in,
>> + u32 size)
>> +{
>> + u32 entry_size = roundup_pow_of_two(size);
>> +
>> + lockdep_assert_held(&q->lock);
>> +
>> + memcpy(q->data + q->head, in, size);
>> + q->head = (q->head + entry_size) % q->size;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-06 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-18 7:44 [RFC 00/15] drm/xe: Access counter consumer layer Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-03-18 7:34 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2026-03-18 7:35 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
2026-03-18 7:44 ` [RFC 01/15] drm/xe: Add xe_usm_queue generic USM circular buffer Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-04-01 21:28 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-06 4:46 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad [this message]
2026-03-18 7:44 ` [RFC 02/15] drm/xe/pagefault: Use xe_usm_queue helpers Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-03-18 7:44 ` [RFC 03/15] drm/xe: Stub out new access_counter layer Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-04-02 21:46 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-06 5:28 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2026-03-18 7:44 ` [RFC 04/15] drm/xe: Implement xe_access_counter_init Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-03-18 7:44 ` [RFC 05/15] drm/xe: Implement xe_access_counter_handler Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-04-03 2:06 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-18 7:44 ` [RFC 06/15] drm/xe: Extract xe_vma_lock_and_validate helper Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-04-01 22:03 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-18 7:44 ` [RFC 07/15] drm/xe: Move ASID to FAULT VM lookup to xe_device Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-04-02 21:50 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-07 6:41 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2026-03-18 7:44 ` [RFC 08/15] drm/xe: Implement xe_access_counter_queue_work Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-04-01 21:10 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-01 22:01 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-01 22:11 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-02 22:06 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-18 7:44 ` [RFC 09/15] drm/xe/trace: Add xe_vma_acc trace event for access counter notifications Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-04-03 1:01 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-18 7:44 ` [RFC 10/15] drm/xe/svm: Handle svm ranges on access ctr trigger Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-04-03 0:25 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-18 7:44 ` [RFC 11/15] drm/xe: Add xe_guc_access_counter layer Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-04-02 21:27 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-18 7:44 ` [RFC 12/15] drm/xe/uapi: Add access counter parameter extension for exec queue Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-03-24 14:25 ` Francois Dugast
2026-04-01 14:46 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-01 16:36 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2026-03-18 7:44 ` [RFC 13/15] drm/xe/lrc: Pass exec_queue to xe_lrc_create for access counter params Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-03-18 7:44 ` [RFC 14/15] drm/xe/vm: Add xe_vma_supports_access_ctr() helper Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-03-18 7:44 ` [RFC 15/15] drm/xe/pt: Set NC PTE bit for VMAs ineligible for access counting Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-04-03 0:09 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eaf6627b-2689-4c07-9dca-7d7ee575d517@intel.com \
--to=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=arvind.yadav@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox