From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/display: Add macro HAS_PIXEL_REPLICATION
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:32:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0cdac3f-7e42-412f-9185-d7ba097e1ead@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ttd5y62d.fsf@intel.com>
On 10/21/2024 6:19 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2024, Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> wrote:
>> Add macro for Pixel replication support with DSC.
> Add blank line here.
>
>> Bspec: 49259, 68912.
>>
> Remove blank line here.
Noted will have Bspec as first line of the trailer.
Regards,
Ankit
>
>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
>> index 071a36b51f79..a21b910879df 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
>> @@ -149,6 +149,9 @@ enum intel_display_subplatform {
>> #define HAS_MBUS_JOINING(i915) (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(i915) || DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14)
>> #define HAS_MSO(i915) (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12)
>> #define HAS_OVERLAY(i915) (DISPLAY_INFO(i915)->has_overlay)
>> +#define HAS_PIXEL_REPLICATION(i915) (HAS_DSC(i915) && \
>> + (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20 || \
>> + DISPLAY_VER_FULL(i915) == IP_VER(14, 1)))
>> #define HAS_PSR(i915) (DISPLAY_INFO(i915)->has_psr)
>> #define HAS_PSR_HW_TRACKING(i915) (DISPLAY_INFO(i915)->has_psr_hw_tracking)
>> #define HAS_PSR2_SEL_FETCH(i915) (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-22 4:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-21 12:33 [PATCH 00/16] Add support for 3 VDSC engines 12 slices Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-21 12:33 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/dp: Update Comment for Valid DSC Slices per Line Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-22 4:37 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/display: Prepare for dsc 3 stream splitter Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-21 12:46 ` Jani Nikula
2024-10-22 3:53 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-10-22 4:51 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-10-22 7:51 ` Jani Nikula
2024-10-22 10:04 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/vdsc: Use VDSC0/VDSC1 for LEFT/RIGHT VDSC engine Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/vdsc: Introduce 3rd VDSC engine VDSC2 Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/vdsc: Add support for read/write PPS for 3rd DSC engine Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915/dp: Ensure hactive is divisible by slice count Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/dp: Enable 3 DSC engines for 12 slices Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/display: Add macro HAS_PIXEL_REPLICATION Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-21 12:49 ` Jani Nikula
2024-10-22 4:02 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2024-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/display: Add support for DSC pixel replication Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Account for pixel replication for MST overhead with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/dp: Account for pixel replication for BW computation " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/display: Account for pixel replication in pipe_src Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/dp: Enable DSC pixel replication Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/dsc: Introduce odd pixel removal Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/display: Adjust Pipe SRC Width for Odd Pixels Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915/dp: Add Check for Odd Pixel Requirement Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-21 12:37 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add support for 3 VDSC engines 12 slices (rev4) Patchwork
2024-10-21 12:38 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-21 12:39 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-10-21 12:50 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-21 12:53 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-21 12:54 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-21 13:13 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-10-21 17:44 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-10-23 6:52 [PATCH 00/16] Add support for 3 VDSC engines 12 slices Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-23 6:52 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/display: Add macro HAS_PIXEL_REPLICATION Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-23 8:39 ` Kandpal, Suraj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f0cdac3f-7e42-412f-9185-d7ba097e1ead@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox