From: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/6] drm/xe/mmio: s/lmem/vram/
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 12:03:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f4fbb52e-0b6b-36de-eb45-616236d4587f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230301144815.248239-3-matthew.auld@intel.com>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
In addition, in the code of the function below, a variable or string
named lmem is used. Is the code intentionally not modified?
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
xe_bo_pin()
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_migrate.c
test_copy()
Br,
G.G.
On 3/1/23 4:48 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
> This seems to be the preferred nomenclature in xe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c | 6 ++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
> index 65b0df9bb579..e5bd4609aaee 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ _resize_bar(struct xe_device *xe, int resno, resource_size_t size)
> return 1;
> }
>
> -static int xe_resize_lmem_bar(struct xe_device *xe, resource_size_t lmem_size)
> +static int xe_resize_vram_bar(struct xe_device *xe, resource_size_t vram_size)
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev);
> struct pci_bus *root = pdev->bus;
> @@ -78,31 +78,31 @@ static int xe_resize_lmem_bar(struct xe_device *xe, resource_size_t lmem_size)
> u32 pci_cmd;
> int i;
> int ret;
> - u64 force_lmem_bar_size = xe_force_lmem_bar_size;
> + u64 force_vram_bar_size = xe_force_vram_bar_size;
>
> current_size = roundup_pow_of_two(pci_resource_len(pdev, GEN12_LMEM_BAR));
>
> - if (force_lmem_bar_size) {
> + if (force_vram_bar_size) {
> u32 bar_sizes;
>
> - rebar_size = force_lmem_bar_size * (resource_size_t)SZ_1M;
> + rebar_size = force_vram_bar_size * (resource_size_t)SZ_1M;
> bar_sizes = pci_rebar_get_possible_sizes(pdev, GEN12_LMEM_BAR);
>
> if (rebar_size == current_size)
> return 0;
>
> if (!(bar_sizes & BIT(pci_rebar_bytes_to_size(rebar_size))) ||
> - rebar_size >= roundup_pow_of_two(lmem_size)) {
> - rebar_size = lmem_size;
> + rebar_size >= roundup_pow_of_two(vram_size)) {
> + rebar_size = vram_size;
> drm_info(&xe->drm,
> "Given bar size is not within supported size, setting it to default: %llu\n",
> - (u64)lmem_size >> 20);
> + (u64)vram_size >> 20);
> }
> } else {
> rebar_size = current_size;
>
> - if (rebar_size != roundup_pow_of_two(lmem_size))
> - rebar_size = lmem_size;
> + if (rebar_size != roundup_pow_of_two(vram_size))
> + rebar_size = vram_size;
> else
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static int xe_resize_lmem_bar(struct xe_device *xe, resource_size_t lmem_size)
> }
>
> if (!root_res) {
> - drm_info(&xe->drm, "Can't resize LMEM BAR - platform support is missing\n");
> + drm_info(&xe->drm, "Can't resize VRAM BAR - platform support is missing\n");
> return -1;
> }
>
> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ int xe_mmio_total_vram_size(struct xe_device *xe, u64 *vram_size, u64 *usable_si
> if (usable_size) {
> reg = xe_gt_mcr_unicast_read_any(gt, XEHP_FLAT_CCS_BASE_ADDR);
> *usable_size = (u64)REG_FIELD_GET(GENMASK(31, 8), reg) * SZ_64K;
> - drm_info(&xe->drm, "lmem_size: 0x%llx usable_size: 0x%llx\n",
> + drm_info(&xe->drm, "vram_size: 0x%llx usable_size: 0x%llx\n",
> *vram_size, *usable_size);
> }
>
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ int xe_mmio_probe_vram(struct xe_device *xe)
> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev);
> struct xe_gt *gt;
> u8 id;
> - u64 lmem_size;
> + u64 vram_size;
> u64 original_size;
> u64 current_size;
> u64 usable_size;
> @@ -207,29 +207,29 @@ int xe_mmio_probe_vram(struct xe_device *xe)
> gt = xe_device_get_gt(xe, 0);
> original_size = pci_resource_len(pdev, GEN12_LMEM_BAR);
>
> - err = xe_mmio_total_vram_size(xe, &lmem_size, &usable_size);
> + err = xe_mmio_total_vram_size(xe, &vram_size, &usable_size);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - resize_result = xe_resize_lmem_bar(xe, lmem_size);
> + resize_result = xe_resize_vram_bar(xe, vram_size);
> current_size = pci_resource_len(pdev, GEN12_LMEM_BAR);
> xe->mem.vram.io_start = pci_resource_start(pdev, GEN12_LMEM_BAR);
>
> - xe->mem.vram.size = min(current_size, lmem_size);
> + xe->mem.vram.size = min(current_size, vram_size);
>
> if (!xe->mem.vram.size)
> return -EIO;
>
> if (resize_result > 0)
> - drm_info(&xe->drm, "Successfully resize LMEM from %lluMiB to %lluMiB\n",
> + drm_info(&xe->drm, "Successfully resize VRAM from %lluMiB to %lluMiB\n",
> (u64)original_size >> 20,
> (u64)current_size >> 20);
> - else if (xe->mem.vram.size < lmem_size && !xe_force_lmem_bar_size)
> + else if (xe->mem.vram.size < vram_size && !xe_force_vram_bar_size)
> drm_info(&xe->drm, "Using a reduced BAR size of %lluMiB. Consider enabling 'Resizable BAR' support in your BIOS.\n",
> (u64)xe->mem.vram.size >> 20);
> - if (xe->mem.vram.size < lmem_size)
> + if (xe->mem.vram.size < vram_size)
> drm_warn(&xe->drm, "Restricting VRAM size to PCI resource size (0x%llx->0x%llx)\n",
> - lmem_size, (u64)xe->mem.vram.size);
> + vram_size, (u64)xe->mem.vram.size);
>
> xe->mem.vram.mapping = ioremap_wc(xe->mem.vram.io_start, xe->mem.vram.size);
> xe->mem.vram.size = min_t(u64, xe->mem.vram.size, usable_size);
> @@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ int xe_mmio_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> * and we should not continue with driver initialization.
> */
> if (IS_DGFX(xe) && !(xe_mmio_read32(gt, GU_CNTL.reg) & LMEM_INIT)) {
> - drm_err(&xe->drm, "LMEM not initialized by firmware\n");
> + drm_err(&xe->drm, "VRAM not initialized by firmware\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c
> index 5a51a9959eff..6860586ce7f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c
> @@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ bool enable_display = true;
> module_param_named(enable_display, enable_display, bool, 0444);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable_display, "Enable display");
>
> -u32 xe_force_lmem_bar_size;
> -module_param_named(lmem_bar_size, xe_force_lmem_bar_size, uint, 0600);
> -MODULE_PARM_DESC(lmem_bar_size, "Set the lmem bar size(in MiB)");
> +u32 xe_force_vram_bar_size;
> +module_param_named(vram_bar_size, xe_force_vram_bar_size, uint, 0600);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(vram_bar_size, "Set the vram bar size(in MiB)");
>
> int xe_guc_log_level = 5;
> module_param_named(guc_log_level, xe_guc_log_level, int, 0600);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.h
> index 2c6ee46f5595..86916c176382 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,6 @@
> /* Module modprobe variables */
> extern bool enable_guc;
> extern bool enable_display;
> -extern u32 xe_force_lmem_bar_size;
> +extern u32 xe_force_vram_bar_size;
> extern int xe_guc_log_level;
> extern char *xe_param_force_probe;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-07 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-01 14:48 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/6] Some small-bar prep patches Matthew Auld
2023-03-01 14:48 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/6] drm/xe: add xe_ttm_stolen_cpu_access_needs_ggtt() Matthew Auld
2023-03-07 9:53 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2023-03-07 11:12 ` Matthew Auld
2023-03-01 14:48 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/6] drm/xe/mmio: s/lmem/vram/ Matthew Auld
2023-03-07 10:03 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun [this message]
2023-03-07 11:27 ` Matthew Auld
2023-03-07 16:26 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-01 14:48 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/6] drm/xe/vram: start tracking the io_size Matthew Auld
2023-03-07 11:55 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2023-03-07 12:23 ` Matthew Auld
2023-03-01 14:48 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/6] drm/xe/buddy: remove the virtualized start Matthew Auld
2023-03-01 14:48 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 5/6] drm/xe/buddy: add visible tracking Matthew Auld
2023-03-01 14:48 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe/buddy: add compatible and intersects hooks Matthew Auld
2023-03-01 14:55 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Some small-bar prep patches Patchwork
2023-03-01 14:56 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2023-03-01 15:00 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f4fbb52e-0b6b-36de-eb45-616236d4587f@intel.com \
--to=gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox