Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
To: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/xe: Add member initialized_domains to xe_force_wake
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 20:03:49 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f66c1a47-dcc9-44c2-acdb-5e964911b1cd@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240603090147.1098639-2-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>



On 03-06-2024 14:31, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
> To determine the wake status of all initialized domains, a direct
> comparison using (XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL & fw->awake_domains) == XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL
> won't suffice due to difference in domain support across platforms and GTs.
> For instance, MTL GT0 only supports GT and RENDER domains, thus for the
> force wake all scenario, only bits corresponding to GT and RENDER should
> be activated. Consequently, the condition
> (XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL & fw->awake_domains) == XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL will
> consistently be false.
> 
> To address this, introduce a new member named initialized_domains to
> xe_force_wake. This attribute will function as a bitmask, encapsulating
> all initialized force wake domains on the GT.
> 
> v2:
> - %s/supported/initialized/
> - update commit message (Rodrigo)
> 
> Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c       | 30 ++++++++++++++----------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h |  2 ++
>   2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> index 64721c01f30d..98699622d83b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> @@ -26,15 +26,25 @@ fw_to_xe(struct xe_force_wake *fw)
>   	return gt_to_xe(fw_to_gt(fw));
>   }
>   
> -static void domain_init(struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain,
> +static inline void mark_domain_initialized(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> +					   enum xe_force_wake_domain_id id)
> +{
> +	fw->initialized_domains |= BIT(id);
> +}
> +
> +static void domain_init(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>   			enum xe_force_wake_domain_id id,
>   			struct xe_reg reg, struct xe_reg ack, u32 val, u32 mask)
>   {
> +	struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain = &fw->domains[id];
> +
>   	domain->id = id;
>   	domain->reg_ctl = reg;
>   	domain->reg_ack = ack;
>   	domain->val = val;
>   	domain->mask = mask;
> +
> +	mark_domain_initialized(fw, id);
>   }
>   
>   void xe_force_wake_init_gt(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake *fw)
> @@ -48,15 +58,13 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_gt(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake *fw)
>   	xe_gt_assert(gt, GRAPHICS_VER(gt_to_xe(gt)) >= 11);
>   
>   	if (xe->info.graphics_verx100 >= 1270) {
> -		domain_init(&fw->domains[XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT],
> -			    XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT,
> +		domain_init(fw, XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_GT,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_ACK_GT_MTL,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_THREAD_XE,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_THREAD_XE_MASK);
>   	} else {
> -		domain_init(&fw->domains[XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT],
> -			    XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT,
> +		domain_init(fw, XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_GT,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_ACK_GT,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_THREAD_XE,
> @@ -72,8 +80,7 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_engines(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake *fw)
>   	xe_gt_assert(gt, GRAPHICS_VER(gt_to_xe(gt)) >= 11);
>   
>   	if (!xe_gt_is_media_type(gt))
> -		domain_init(&fw->domains[XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_RENDER],
> -			    XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_RENDER,
> +		domain_init(fw, XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_RENDER,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_RENDER,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_ACK_RENDER,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_THREAD_XE,
> @@ -83,8 +90,7 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_engines(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake *fw)
>   		if (!(gt->info.engine_mask & BIT(i)))
>   			continue;
>   
> -		domain_init(&fw->domains[XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX0 + j],
> -			    XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX0 + j,
> +		domain_init(fw, XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX0 + j,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_MEDIA_VDBOX(j),
>   			    FORCEWAKE_ACK_MEDIA_VDBOX(j),
>   			    FORCEWAKE_THREAD_XE,
> @@ -95,8 +101,7 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_engines(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake *fw)
>   		if (!(gt->info.engine_mask & BIT(i)))
>   			continue;
>   
> -		domain_init(&fw->domains[XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX0 + j],
> -			    XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX0 + j,
> +		domain_init(fw, XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX0 + j,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_MEDIA_VEBOX(j),
>   			    FORCEWAKE_ACK_MEDIA_VEBOX(j),
>   			    FORCEWAKE_THREAD_XE,
> @@ -104,8 +109,7 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_engines(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake *fw)
>   	}
>   
>   	if (gt->info.engine_mask & BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_GSCCS0))
> -		domain_init(&fw->domains[XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GSC],
> -			    XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GSC,
> +		domain_init(fw, XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GSC,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_GSC,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_ACK_GSC,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_THREAD_XE,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h
> index ed0edc2cdf9f..1056d196b29d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h
> @@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ struct xe_force_wake {
>   	spinlock_t lock;
>   	/** @awake_domains: mask of all domains awake */
>   	enum xe_force_wake_domains awake_domains;
> +	/** @initialized_domains: mask of all supported domains */
> +	enum xe_force_wake_domains initialized_domains;
>   	/** @domains: force wake domains */
LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>

Regards,
Badal
>   	struct xe_force_wake_domain domains[XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_COUNT];
>   };

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-03 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-03  9:01 [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/xe: Cleanup force wake registers bit definitions Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-06-03  9:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/xe: Add member initialized_domains to xe_force_wake Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-06-03 14:33   ` Nilawar, Badal [this message]
2024-06-03  9:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/xe: Fix xe_force_wake_assert_held for enum XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-06-03 14:36   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-06-03 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/xe: Cleanup force wake registers bit definitions Nilawar, Badal
2024-06-04 14:45 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v2,1/3] " Patchwork
2024-06-04 14:46 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-06-04 14:46 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-06-04 14:58 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-06-04 14:58 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-06-04 15:00 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2024-06-04 16:59 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-06-04 18:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " Rodrigo Vivi
2024-06-05  3:03   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f66c1a47-dcc9-44c2-acdb-5e964911b1cd@intel.com \
    --to=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
    --cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox