From: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <arunpravin.paneerselvam@amd.com>
To: matthew.auld@intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: christian.koenig@amd.com, alexander.deucher@amd.com,
Anand.Raghavendra@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpu/buddy: add range-restricted contiguous allocation fallback
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 12:36:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f69f88dc-0003-4ffe-ab99-94f533894ad2@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930062117.585089-1-arunpravin.paneerselvam@amd.com>
Hi Matthew,
Could you please review this patch.
Thanks,
Arun.
On 9/30/2026 11:51 AM, Arunpravin Paneer Selvam wrote:
> From: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>
>
> A range + contiguous allocation (e.g. a scanout FB confined to the
> CPU-visible VRAM aperture) rounds its size up to a power of two and
> requires a naturally aligned free block of that size; on a fragmented
> aperture no such aligned block may exist even though enough contiguous
> space is free, so the allocation fails with -ENOSPC.
>
> The non-range contiguous path already recovers from this via
> __alloc_contig_try_harder(), which stitches an exact-size span from
> smaller adjacent blocks, but that fallback was unreachable once
> GPU_BUDDY_RANGE_ALLOCATION was set. Give __alloc_contig_try_harder()
> a [range_start, range_end) window and route the range + contiguous
> case through it: each candidate placement is confined to the window
> and aligned to min_block_size. Non-range callers pass [0, mm->size),
> where the guards are no-ops, so the existing behaviour is unchanged.
> A KUnit regression test covers the fragmentation pattern.
>
> Resolves the igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right@pipe-a/pipe-b
> regression.
>
> v2:
> - Drop the split-undo patch; the range-bias search always descends to
> an exact-order block or fails the split (already handled), so the
> extra undo was redundant. (Matthew)
> - Verified this fallback alone fixes the kms_plane regression.
>
> Fixes: 1ad5e807f716 ("gpu/buddy: replace dual-tree/force_merge with decoupled dirty tracker")
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/buddy.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++--------------
> drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/buddy.c
> index 2f2aaadafe35..5265e1f6a318 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/buddy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/buddy.c
> @@ -1685,26 +1685,14 @@ static int __gpu_buddy_alloc_range(struct gpu_buddy *mm,
> blocks, total_allocated_on_err);
> }
>
> -static int __alloc_contig_aligned_retry(struct gpu_buddy *mm,
> - u64 unaligned_offset,
> - u64 size,
> - u64 min_block_size,
> - unsigned long flags,
> - struct list_head *blocks)
> -{
> - u64 aligned_offset = round_down(unaligned_offset, min_block_size);
> -
> - return __gpu_buddy_alloc_range(mm, aligned_offset, size, flags,
> - NULL, blocks);
> -}
> -
> static int __alloc_contig_try_harder(struct gpu_buddy *mm,
> + u64 range_start, u64 range_end,
> u64 size,
> u64 min_block_size,
> unsigned long flags,
> struct list_head *blocks)
> {
> - u64 rhs_offset, lhs_offset, filled;
> + u64 rhs_offset, lhs_offset, filled, aligned;
> struct gpu_buddy_block *block;
> struct rb_root *root;
> struct rb_node *iter;
> @@ -1734,20 +1722,24 @@ static int __alloc_contig_try_harder(struct gpu_buddy *mm,
> flags, &filled, blocks);
> if (err && err != -ENOSPC)
> return err;
> - if (!err && IS_ALIGNED(rhs_offset, min_block_size))
> + if (!err && IS_ALIGNED(rhs_offset, min_block_size) &&
> + rhs_offset >= range_start && rhs_offset + size <= range_end)
> return 0;
> if (!err) {
> /* Allocate the unaligned RHS offset using round_down */
> gpu_buddy_free_list_internal(mm, blocks);
> - err = __alloc_contig_aligned_retry(mm, rhs_offset,
> - size,
> - min_block_size,
> - flags, blocks);
> - if (!err)
> - return 0;
> - if (err != -ENOSPC) {
> - gpu_buddy_free_list_internal(mm, blocks);
> - return err;
> +
> + aligned = round_down(rhs_offset, min_block_size);
> + if (aligned >= range_start &&
> + aligned + size <= range_end) {
> + err = __gpu_buddy_alloc_range(mm, aligned, size,
> + flags, NULL, blocks);
> + if (!err)
> + return 0;
> + if (err != -ENOSPC) {
> + gpu_buddy_free_list_internal(mm, blocks);
> + return err;
> + }
> }
> goto next;
> }
> @@ -1759,15 +1751,17 @@ static int __alloc_contig_try_harder(struct gpu_buddy *mm,
>
> /* Allocate the unaligned LHS offset using round_down */
> gpu_buddy_free_list_internal(mm, blocks);
> - err = __alloc_contig_aligned_retry(mm, lhs_offset,
> - size,
> - min_block_size,
> - flags, blocks);
> - if (!err)
> - return 0;
> - if (err != -ENOSPC) {
> - gpu_buddy_free_list_internal(mm, blocks);
> - return err;
> +
> + aligned = round_down(lhs_offset, min_block_size);
> + if (aligned >= range_start && aligned + size <= range_end) {
> + err = __gpu_buddy_alloc_range(mm, aligned, size,
> + flags, NULL, blocks);
> + if (!err)
> + return 0;
> + if (err != -ENOSPC) {
> + gpu_buddy_free_list_internal(mm, blocks);
> + return err;
> + }
> }
> next:
> gpu_buddy_free_list_internal(mm, blocks);
> @@ -2021,11 +2015,18 @@ int gpu_buddy_alloc_blocks(struct gpu_buddy *mm,
> min_order = ilog2(min_block_size) - ilog2(mm->chunk_size);
>
> if (order > mm->max_order || size > mm->size) {
> - if ((flags & GPU_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION) &&
> - !(flags & GPU_BUDDY_RANGE_ALLOCATION))
> - return __alloc_contig_try_harder(mm, original_size,
> + if (flags & GPU_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION) {
> + u64 range_start, range_end;
> +
> + range_start = (flags & GPU_BUDDY_RANGE_ALLOCATION) ? start : 0;
> + range_end = (flags & GPU_BUDDY_RANGE_ALLOCATION) ? end : mm->size;
> +
> + return __alloc_contig_try_harder(mm, range_start,
> + range_end,
> + original_size,
> original_min_size,
> flags, blocks);
> + }
>
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -2058,9 +2059,14 @@ int gpu_buddy_alloc_blocks(struct gpu_buddy *mm,
> * Try contiguous block allocation through
> * try harder method.
> */
> - if (flags & GPU_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION &&
> - !(flags & GPU_BUDDY_RANGE_ALLOCATION)) {
> - err = __alloc_contig_try_harder(mm,
> + if (flags & GPU_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION) {
> + u64 range_start, range_end;
> +
> + range_start = (flags & GPU_BUDDY_RANGE_ALLOCATION) ? start : 0;
> + range_end = (flags & GPU_BUDDY_RANGE_ALLOCATION) ? end : mm->size;
> +
> + err = __alloc_contig_try_harder(mm, range_start,
> + range_end,
> original_size,
> original_min_size,
> flags,
> @@ -2068,9 +2074,9 @@ int gpu_buddy_alloc_blocks(struct gpu_buddy *mm,
> if (!err)
> return 0;
> if (err != -ENOSPC)
> - return err;
> - goto err_free;
> + goto err_free;
> }
> +
> err = -ENOSPC;
> goto err_free;
> } while (1);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c b/drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c
> index b75d32ca6ca0..2c445870b808 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c
> @@ -1251,6 +1251,77 @@ static void gpu_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
> gpu_buddy_fini(&mm);
> }
>
> +static void gpu_test_buddy_alloc_range_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + const unsigned long ps = SZ_4K, mm_size = 16 * ps;
> + const unsigned long range_end = 8 * ps;
> + struct gpu_buddy_block *block, *prev;
> + LIST_HEAD(allocated);
> + struct gpu_buddy mm;
> + LIST_HEAD(pin_lo);
> + LIST_HEAD(pin_hi);
> + u64 total;
> +
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, gpu_buddy_init(&mm, mm_size, ps),
> + "buddy_init failed\n");
> +
> + /*
> + * Idea is to confine the test to the sub-range [0, 32K), which a 12K
> + * contiguous request (rounded up to 16K) splits into two naturally
> + * aligned 16K slots: [0, 16K) and [16K, 32K). We pin the first 4K page
> + * of each slot ([0, 4K) and [16K, 20K)) so that neither aligned slot
> + * can satisfy the rounded-up 16K allocation, yet the freed remainder
> + * still leaves a contiguous 12K hole at offset 4K, which is page-aligned
> + * but not 16K-aligned. A 12K contiguous+range allocation must therefore
> + * fall back to stitching that span instead of returning -ENOSPC.
> + */
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test,
> + gpu_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, ps, ps, ps,
> + &pin_lo, 0),
> + "failed to pin low page\n");
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test,
> + gpu_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 4 * ps, 5 * ps, ps,
> + ps, &pin_hi, 0),
> + "failed to pin high page\n");
> +
> + /* No aligned 16K block is free; the range-aware fallback must stitch
> + * the unaligned [ps, 4*ps) hole instead of returning -ENOSPC.
> + */
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test,
> + gpu_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, range_end, 3 * ps,
> + ps, &allocated,
> + GPU_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION |
> + GPU_BUDDY_RANGE_ALLOCATION),
> + "range-restricted contiguous alloc failed\n");
> +
> + /* The result must be exactly 3*ps, contiguous, and inside the range. */
> + total = 0;
> + prev = NULL;
> + list_for_each_entry(block, &allocated, link) {
> + u64 offset = gpu_buddy_block_offset(block);
> + u64 bsize = gpu_buddy_block_size(&mm, block);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE_MSG(test, offset + bsize <= range_end,
> + "block [%llx, %llx) outside range\n",
> + offset, offset + bsize);
> + if (prev)
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
> + gpu_buddy_block_offset(prev) +
> + gpu_buddy_block_size(&mm, prev),
> + offset,
> + "block at %llx not contiguous\n",
> + offset);
> + prev = block;
> + total += bsize;
> + }
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, total, 3 * ps);
> +
> + gpu_buddy_free_list(&mm, &allocated, 0);
> + gpu_buddy_free_list(&mm, &pin_lo, 0);
> + gpu_buddy_free_list(&mm, &pin_hi, 0);
> + gpu_buddy_fini(&mm);
> +}
> +
> static void gpu_test_buddy_alloc_pathological(struct kunit *test)
> {
> u64 mm_size, size, start = 0;
> @@ -1534,10 +1605,13 @@ static void gpu_test_buddy_alloc_exceeds_max_order(struct kunit *test)
> GPU_BUDDY_RANGE_ALLOCATION);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, err, -EINVAL);
>
> - /* CONTIGUOUS + RANGE should return -EINVAL (no try_harder for RANGE) */
> - err = gpu_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size, size, SZ_4K, &blocks,
> - GPU_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION | GPU_BUDDY_RANGE_ALLOCATION);
> - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, err, -EINVAL);
> + /* CONTIGUOUS + RANGE should succeed via the range-aware try_harder */
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, gpu_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size, size,
> + SZ_4K, &blocks,
> + GPU_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION |
> + GPU_BUDDY_RANGE_ALLOCATION),
> + "range contiguous alloc hit an error size=%llu\n", size);
> + gpu_buddy_free_list(&mm, &blocks, 0);
>
> gpu_buddy_fini(&mm);
> }
> @@ -1603,6 +1677,7 @@ static struct kunit_case gpu_buddy_tests[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(gpu_test_buddy_alloc_pessimistic),
> KUNIT_CASE(gpu_test_buddy_alloc_pathological),
> KUNIT_CASE(gpu_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous),
> + KUNIT_CASE(gpu_test_buddy_alloc_range_contiguous),
> KUNIT_CASE(gpu_test_buddy_alloc_clear),
> KUNIT_CASE(gpu_test_buddy_alloc_range),
> KUNIT_CASE(gpu_test_buddy_alloc_range_bias),
>
> base-commit: 744f262401cc2e1f3827496c72a47e072d31a852
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 6:21 [PATCH v2] gpu/buddy: add range-restricted contiguous allocation fallback Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2026-09-30 6:29 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-09-30 6:31 ` [PATCH v2] " sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 7:32 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2026-09-30 11:53 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-10-01 7:06 ` Arunpravin Paneer Selvam [this message]
2026-10-01 18:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Matthew Auld
2026-10-05 14:14 ` Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2026-10-06 9:57 ` Matthew Auld
2026-10-09 9:14 ` Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2026-10-09 10:17 ` Matthew Auld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f69f88dc-0003-4ffe-ab99-94f533894ad2@amd.com \
--to=arunpravin.paneerselvam@amd.com \
--cc=Anand.Raghavendra@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox