From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/uncore: Don't meddle with mmio debug upon user forcewake
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2026 16:58:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8a0ccccfd1929ef7d845507f2cb8eb960d9fcad@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104221842.18799-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, 05 Nov 2026, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Currently when userspace takes the forcewake via debugfs, the
> kernel will stop looking for unclaimed mmio accesses. That link
> is kinda weird since forcewake is for GT stuff and unclaimed
> mmio detection is for display stuff.
>
> Just kill the mmio debug suspend/resume upon user forcewake.
> One should almost always use IGT_NO_FORCEWAKE=1 when poking
> at display register from userspace anyway so as to not
> perturb the rest of the system.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 46 ++---------------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index e360e4f9d9a2..abd695e880c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -65,41 +65,6 @@ intel_uncore_mmio_debug_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> i915->uncore.debug = &i915->mmio_debug;
> }
>
> -static void mmio_debug_suspend(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> -{
> - if (!uncore->debug)
> - return;
> -
> - spin_lock(&uncore->debug->lock);
> -
> - /* Save and disable mmio debugging for the user bypass */
> - if (!uncore->debug->suspend_count++) {
> - uncore->debug->saved_mmio_check = uncore->debug->unclaimed_mmio_check;
> - uncore->debug->unclaimed_mmio_check = 0;
> - }
> -
> - spin_unlock(&uncore->debug->lock);
> -}
> -
> -static bool check_for_unclaimed_mmio(struct intel_uncore *uncore);
> -
> -static void mmio_debug_resume(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> -{
> - if (!uncore->debug)
> - return;
> -
> - spin_lock(&uncore->debug->lock);
> -
> - if (!--uncore->debug->suspend_count)
> - uncore->debug->unclaimed_mmio_check = uncore->debug->saved_mmio_check;
> -
> - if (check_for_unclaimed_mmio(uncore))
> - drm_info(&uncore->i915->drm,
> - "Invalid mmio detected during user access\n");
> -
> - spin_unlock(&uncore->debug->lock);
> -}
> -
> static const char * const forcewake_domain_names[] = {
> "render",
> "gt",
> @@ -598,9 +563,6 @@ check_for_unclaimed_mmio(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&uncore->debug->lock);
>
> - if (uncore->debug->suspend_count)
> - return false;
> -
> if (intel_uncore_has_fpga_dbg_unclaimed(uncore))
> ret |= fpga_check_for_unclaimed_mmio(uncore);
>
> @@ -733,10 +695,8 @@ void intel_uncore_forcewake_get(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> void intel_uncore_forcewake_user_get(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> {
> spin_lock_irq(&uncore->lock);
> - if (!uncore->user_forcewake_count++) {
> + if (!uncore->user_forcewake_count++)
> intel_uncore_forcewake_get__locked(uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> - mmio_debug_suspend(uncore);
> - }
> spin_unlock_irq(&uncore->lock);
> }
>
> @@ -750,10 +710,8 @@ void intel_uncore_forcewake_user_get(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> void intel_uncore_forcewake_user_put(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> {
> spin_lock_irq(&uncore->lock);
> - if (!--uncore->user_forcewake_count) {
> - mmio_debug_resume(uncore);
> + if (!--uncore->user_forcewake_count)
> intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> - }
> spin_unlock_irq(&uncore->lock);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
> index fafc2ca9a237..4ec7c545d04e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
> @@ -42,8 +42,6 @@ struct intel_gt;
> struct intel_uncore_mmio_debug {
> spinlock_t lock; /** lock is also taken in irq contexts. */
> int unclaimed_mmio_check;
> - int saved_mmio_check;
> - u32 suspend_count;
> };
>
> enum forcewake_domain_id {
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 22:18 [PATCH 0/9] drm/i915/de: Work towards uncore elimination Ville Syrjala
2026-11-04 22:18 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915/de: Introduce dislay->mmio and intel_de_init() Ville Syrjala
2026-11-04 22:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 8:58 ` Jani Nikula
2026-11-05 20:03 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-11-04 23:29 ` Michał Grzelak
2026-11-04 22:18 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/de: Convert intel_de_{read,write}() into vfuncs Ville Syrjala
2026-11-06 14:50 ` Jani Nikula
2026-11-06 15:35 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-11-04 22:18 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/de: Introduce mmio read/write templates Ville Syrjala
2026-11-04 23:32 ` Michał Grzelak
2026-11-06 14:52 ` Jani Nikula
2026-11-06 16:03 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-11-04 22:18 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/de: Eliminate runtime overhead from DMC wakelock on pre-LNL platforms Ville Syrjala
2026-11-06 14:53 ` Jani Nikula
2026-11-04 22:18 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/de: Introduce display->mmio.lock Ville Syrjala
2026-11-04 22:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 9:32 ` Jani Nikula
2026-11-05 13:43 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-11-05 13:47 ` Jani Nikula
2026-11-06 14:55 ` Jani Nikula
2026-11-04 22:18 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/uncore: Don't meddle with mmio debug upon user forcewake Ville Syrjala
2026-11-06 14:58 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2026-11-04 22:18 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915/de: Move unclaimed mmio detection into display code Ville Syrjala
2026-11-04 22:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 16:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-11-06 16:39 ` Jani Nikula
2026-11-06 17:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-11-04 22:18 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/de: Stop using intel_uncore_{read,write}() Ville Syrjala
2026-11-06 15:37 ` Jani Nikula
2026-11-06 15:55 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-11-04 22:18 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/xe: Nuke the intel_uncore_{read,write}() wrappers Ville Syrjala
2026-11-06 15:38 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/xe: Nuke the intel_uncore_{read, write}() wrappers Jani Nikula
2026-11-05 0:01 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/i915/de: Work towards uncore elimination Patchwork
2026-11-05 0:03 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-11-05 0:40 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-11-05 7:10 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/i915/de: Work towards uncore elimination (rev2) Patchwork
2026-11-05 7:13 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-11-05 7:47 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-11-06 1:17 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f8a0ccccfd1929ef7d845507f2cb8eb960d9fcad@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox