From: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
To: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Brost, Matthew" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Lin, Shuicheng" <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe: Clean up GuC software state after a wedge
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 19:45:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa2d3d56688c64f27baadda86bc1aa8be118179b.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251014180927.105077-7-stuart.summers@intel.com>
On Tue, 2025-10-14 at 18:09 +0000, Stuart Summers wrote:
> Comments also added to the code, but in the event of
> a wedge or a hardware failure while communication with
> GuC is outstanding (e.g. during a schedule disable or
> context deregistration), the driver doesn't automatically
> reset the software state as it would in a typical GT reset
> since we are trying to save the state for debug. However
> once the user unbinds the driver we still need to go through
> and clean everything up for these exec queues so we don't
> leak memory on the DRM side (e.g. LRC or LRC BO).
>
> Add a kick start to the DRM scheduler to handle any outstanding
> messages on hold during the wedge and go through the GuC stop
> flow to simulate that reset on teardown.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Please hold on review here. I think there's still something missing on
the wedge cleanup case that causes issues after wedging and then doing
binds/unbinds in a loop after. I'm working to resolve that and I'll
post a new series after.
Thanks,
Stuart
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> index 5ec1e4a83d68..0bbae336c722 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> @@ -276,6 +276,14 @@ static void guc_submit_fini(struct drm_device
> *drm, void *arg)
> struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> int ret;
>
> + /*
> + * If GuC stopped responding during deregistration
> + * some queues can be left in a bad state. Ensure
> + * these are all cleaned up by going through the
> + * GuC software reset flow.
> + */
> + xe_guc_stop(guc);
> +
> ret = wait_event_timeout(guc->submission_state.fini_wq,
> xa_empty(&guc-
> >submission_state.exec_queue_lookup),
> HZ * 5);
> @@ -295,6 +303,13 @@ static void guc_submit_wedged_fini(void *arg)
>
> mutex_lock(&guc->submission_state.lock);
> xa_for_each(&guc->submission_state.exec_queue_lookup, index,
> q) {
> + /*
> + * Kick start the scheduler since some messages
> + * might have been added while the scheduler was
> + * stopped during a wedge event.
> + */
> + xe_sched_submission_start(&q->guc->sched);
> +
> if (exec_queue_wedged(q)) {
> mutex_unlock(&guc->submission_state.lock);
> xe_exec_queue_put(q);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-15 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-14 18:09 [PATCH 0/6] Fix a couple of wedge corner-case memory leaks Stuart Summers
2025-10-14 18:09 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/xe: Add additional trace points for LRCs Stuart Summers
2025-10-14 18:09 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/xe: Add a trace point for VM close Stuart Summers
2025-10-14 18:09 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/xe: Add the BO pointer info to the BO trace Stuart Summers
2025-10-14 18:09 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/xe: Add new exec queue trace points Stuart Summers
2025-10-14 18:09 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/xe: Correct migration VM teardown order Stuart Summers
2025-10-15 0:59 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-15 17:55 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-10-14 18:09 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe: Clean up GuC software state after a wedge Stuart Summers
2025-10-15 19:45 ` Summers, Stuart [this message]
2025-10-16 3:42 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-16 17:50 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-10-16 22:10 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-17 14:48 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-10-14 18:15 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Fix a couple of wedge corner-case memory leaks (rev4) Patchwork
2025-10-14 18:16 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-10-14 19:13 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-10-14 21:14 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-10-15 5:18 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-27 18:04 [PATCH 0/6] Fix a couple of wedge corner-case memory leaks Stuart Summers
2025-10-27 18:04 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe: Clean up GuC software state after a wedge Stuart Summers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa2d3d56688c64f27baadda86bc1aa8be118179b.camel@intel.com \
--to=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=shuicheng.lin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox