Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: "Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr: Do not disable Panel Replay if PSR2 is disabled
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 07:59:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb90f82eb7f45d93c181c64b308cdd77979667cb.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aG18_m9rQfM2Zbbh@intel.com>

On Tue, 2025-07-08 at 16:18 -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 05:39:08AM +0000, Hogander, Jouni wrote:
> > On Mon, 2025-07-07 at 11:01 -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2025 at 01:47:33PM +0300, Jouni Högander wrote:
> > > > Currently disabling PSR2 via enable_psr module parameter causes
> > > > Panel
> > > > Replay being disabled as well. This patch changes this by still
> > > > allowing
> > > > Panel Replay even if PSR2 is disabled.
> > > > 
> > > > After this patch enable_psr module parameter values are:
> > > > 
> > > > -1 = PSR1 : yes, PSR2 = yes, Panel Replay : yes
> > > >  0 = PSR1 : no,  PSR2 = no,  Panel Replay : no
> > > >  1 = PSR1 : yes, PSR2 = no,  Panel Replay : yes
> > > >  2 = PSR1 : yes, PSR2 = yes, Panel Replay : no
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c   |  3 +--
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c      | 20
> > > > +++++++++++++--
> > > > ----
> > > >  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git
> > > > a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c
> > > > index 75316247ee8a..1ba17ea40bba 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c
> > > > @@ -116,8 +116,7 @@
> > > > intel_display_param_named_unsafe(enable_fbc,
> > > > int, 0400,
> > > >  	"(default: -1 (use per-chip default))");
> > > >  
> > > >  intel_display_param_named_unsafe(enable_psr, int, 0400,
> > > > -	"Enable PSR "
> > > > -	"(0=disabled, 1=enable up to PSR1, 2=enable up to
> > > > PSR2) "
> > > > +	"Enable PSR (0=disabled, 1=disable PSR2, 2=disable
> > > > Panel
> > > > Replay)"
> > > 
> > > What about a bit mask?
> > > 
> > > PSR1 = BIT0
> > > PSR2 = BIT1 (PSR2 infers PSR1 enabled)
> > > PANEL_REPLAY = BIT2 (also infers PSR1(and 2?) enabled)
> > > 
> > > (Peraps even bit3 for early transport?)
> > > 
> > > This is backwards compatible because
> > > 
> > > 0 = disabled,
> > > 1 = up to psr1,
> > > 2 = up to psr2, (no panel replay)
> > > 3 = up to psr2, (same as 2)
> > > 4 = panel replay on
> > > 5 = same as 5
> > 
> > Original problem behind my patch is enable_psr=1 having impact on
> > Panel
> > Replay. First I thought I Fix this by just ignoring enable_psr on
> > Panel
> > Replay. That would mean adding enable_panel_replay parameter as
> > well. I
> > didn't want to do that. We have user wanting to have PSR2
> > specifically
> > disabled but still use Panel Replay.
> > ->
> > I wanted to have enable_psr legacy values working as before without
> > having impact on Panel Replay. To have this I choose this meaning
> > to
> > values (bits):
> > 
> > 0 = disable PSR/Panel Replay completely
> > 1 (BIT0) = disable PSR2 (allow PSR1/Panel Replay) (up to psr1)
> > 2 (BIT1) = disable Panel Replay (allow PSR1/PSR2) (up to psr2, (no
> > panel replay))
> > 
> > I left Early Transport out here as disabling it means disabling
> > Panel
> > Replay as well. I also didn't want to make this parameter too
> > extensive/complex as we have separate debug interface to bisect PSR
> > features (/sys/kernel/debug/dri/*/i915_edp_psr_debug). Using this
> > disable bit approach is also easy to extent in future as needed.
> > 
> > Your idea is following better meaning of "enable_psr".
> 
> Well, but your idea captures better the issue and the backward
> compatibility. Let's go with your definition, but ensure to document
> the parameter like you described here above?

Just sent new version of my set. Please check.

BR,

Jouni Högander

> 
> > 
> > BR,
> > 
> > Jouni Högander
> > 
> > > 
> > > >  	"Default: -1 (use per-chip default)");
> > > >  
> > > >  intel_display_param_named(psr_safest_params, bool, 0400,
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > > index a2b5688f0c82..3215a11baa66 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > > @@ -254,13 +254,15 @@ static bool psr2_global_enabled(struct
> > > > intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	struct intel_display *display =
> > > > to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> > > >  
> > > > +	return display->params.enable_psr != 1;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static bool sel_update_global_enabled(struct intel_dp
> > > > *intel_dp)
> > > > +{
> > > >  	switch (intel_dp->psr.debug &
> > > > I915_PSR_DEBUG_MODE_MASK) {
> > > > -	case I915_PSR_DEBUG_DISABLE:
> > > >  	case I915_PSR_DEBUG_FORCE_PSR1:
> > > >  		return false;
> > > >  	default:
> > > > -		if (display->params.enable_psr == 1)
> > > > -			return false;
> > > >  		return true;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  }
> > > > @@ -269,7 +271,7 @@ static bool
> > > > panel_replay_global_enabled(struct
> > > > intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	struct intel_display *display =
> > > > to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> > > >  
> > > > -	if ((display->params.enable_psr != -1) ||
> > > > +	if (display->params.enable_psr == 2 ||
> > > >  	    (intel_dp->psr.debug &
> > > > I915_PSR_DEBUG_PANEL_REPLAY_DISABLE))
> > > >  		return false;
> > > >  	return true;
> > > > @@ -1415,6 +1417,12 @@ static bool
> > > > intel_psr2_config_valid(struct
> > > > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > >  	if (!intel_dp->psr.sink_psr2_support)
> > > >  		return false;
> > > >  
> > > > +	if (!psr2_global_enabled(intel_dp)) {
> > > > +		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
> > > > +			    "PSR2 disabled by flag\n");
> > > > +		return false;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > >  	/* JSL and EHL only supports eDP 1.3 */
> > > >  	if (display->platform.jasperlake || display-
> > > > > platform.elkhartlake) {
> > > >  		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "PSR2 not supported
> > > > by
> > > > phy\n");
> > > > @@ -1517,7 +1525,7 @@ static bool
> > > > intel_sel_update_config_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > >  		goto unsupported;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > > -	if (!psr2_global_enabled(intel_dp)) {
> > > > +	if (!sel_update_global_enabled(intel_dp)) {
> > > >  		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
> > > >  			    "Selective update disabled by
> > > > flag\n");
> > > >  		goto unsupported;
> > > > @@ -1664,7 +1672,7 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct
> > > > intel_dp
> > > > *intel_dp,
> > > >  	u8 active_pipes = 0;
> > > >  
> > > >  	if (!psr_global_enabled(intel_dp)) {
> > > > -		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "PSR disabled by
> > > > flag\n");
> > > > +		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "PSR/Panel Replay
> > > > disabled by flag\n");
> > > >  		return;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > > -- 
> > > > 2.43.0
> > > > 
> > 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-09  7:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-07 10:47 [PATCH 0/2] Enable_psr kernel parameter changes Jouni Högander
2025-07-07 10:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/psr: Do not disable Early Transport when enable_psr is set Jouni Högander
2025-07-07 10:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr: Do not disable Panel Replay if PSR2 is disabled Jouni Högander
2025-07-07 15:01   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-07-08  5:39     ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-07-08 20:18       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-07-09  7:59         ` Hogander, Jouni [this message]
2025-07-07 10:55 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Enable_psr kernel parameter changes Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fb90f82eb7f45d93c181c64b308cdd77979667cb.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox