From: "Ghimiray, Himal Prasad" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
To: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Remove function xe_device_canonicalize_addr
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 00:45:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fcc4e0d9-7218-4fdd-a1d9-56636e540ba1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1bce8ff9eaf181193401ab2eaa4337a4f9dd7dd9.camel@intel.com>
On 15-07-2024 23:44, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-07-15 at 23:26 +0530, Ghimiray, Himal Prasad wrote:
>>
>> On 15-07-2024 19:35, Souza, Jose wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2024-07-15 at 16:25 +0530, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
>>>> There is no need for converting regular address to canonical address in
>>>> driver, therefore remove unused xe_device_canonicalize_addr.
>>>
>>> I can see several places that should use it but are not.
>>> Like every place that does xe_exec, the address needs to canonical in Xe2+ platforms.
>>
>> Hi Jose, Thanks for feedback. Isn't it the responsibility of UMDs to
>> call xe_exec with a canonical address ?
>
> Yep but xe it self also does xe_execs.
>
>>
>>> We are probably not getting any issues so far by luck, so I would not remove it to add it later.
>>
>> Can you please elaborate on what do you mean by luck here ?
>
> We are luck that so far none of the xe kmd internal usage has a batch buffer with that address that sets the va_bits - 1, if that happened the address
> would not be in canonical format and HW would not execute the batch buffer.
Ok got it. Thanks for the reply.
>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 5 -----
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h | 1 -
>>>> 2 files changed, 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>>> index 06cebaffb451..eb3bb434b180 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>>> @@ -885,11 +885,6 @@ void xe_device_snapshot_print(struct xe_device *xe, struct drm_printer *p)
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -u64 xe_device_canonicalize_addr(struct xe_device *xe, u64 address)
>>>> -{
>>>> - return sign_extend64(address, xe->info.va_bits - 1);
>>>> -}
>>>> -
>>>> u64 xe_device_uncanonicalize_addr(struct xe_device *xe, u64 address)
>>>> {
>>>> return address & GENMASK_ULL(xe->info.va_bits - 1, 0);
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
>>>> index 0a2a3e7fd402..14d4171c467e 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
>>>> @@ -158,7 +158,6 @@ u32 xe_device_ccs_bytes(struct xe_device *xe, u64 size);
>>>>
>>>> void xe_device_snapshot_print(struct xe_device *xe, struct drm_printer *p);
>>>>
>>>> -u64 xe_device_canonicalize_addr(struct xe_device *xe, u64 address);
>>>> u64 xe_device_uncanonicalize_addr(struct xe_device *xe, u64 address);
>>>>
>>>> void xe_device_td_flush(struct xe_device *xe);
>>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-20 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-15 10:55 [PATCH 0/2] Minor cleanups Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-07-15 10:45 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-07-15 10:46 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-07-15 10:47 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-07-15 10:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Delete unused register from xe_regs.h Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-07-22 4:53 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2024-07-22 5:12 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-07-24 17:53 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-07-15 10:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Remove function xe_device_canonicalize_addr Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-07-15 14:05 ` Souza, Jose
2024-07-15 17:56 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-07-15 18:14 ` Souza, Jose
2024-07-20 19:15 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad [this message]
2024-07-25 13:15 ` Francois Dugast
2024-07-15 10:59 ` ✓ CI.Build: success for Minor cleanups Patchwork
2024-07-15 11:01 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-07-15 11:02 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-07-15 11:26 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-07-15 12:58 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fcc4e0d9-7218-4fdd-a1d9-56636e540ba1@intel.com \
--to=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox