From: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
To: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
<lucas.demarchi@intel.com>, <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
<ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>, <john.c.harrison@intel.com>,
<rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, <aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com>,
<soham.purkait@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] drm/xe/guc: Expose engine activity only for supported GuC version
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 15:35:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff840b0a-c693-4e6d-8097-6e4c08818100@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z4mRy9d7leeoPDLB@orsosgc001>
Hi Umesh
On 1/17/2025 4:40 AM, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 01:25:57PM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
>> Engine activity is supported only on GuC submission version >= 1.14.1
>> Allow enabling/reading engine activity only on supported
>> GuC versions. Warn once if not supported.
>>
>> v2: use guc submission version (John)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_engine_activity.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_engine_activity.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_engine_activity.c b/drivers/
>> gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_engine_activity.c
>> index 14950b42d1b1..5aea42f0cded 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_engine_activity.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_engine_activity.c
>> @@ -255,6 +255,9 @@ u64 xe_guc_engine_activity_active_ticks(struct
>> xe_hw_engine *hwe)
>> {
>> struct xe_guc *guc = &hwe->gt->uc.guc;
>>
>> + if (!xe_guc_engine_activity_supported(guc))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> return get_engine_active_ticks(guc, hwe);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -268,9 +271,31 @@ u64 xe_guc_engine_activity_total_ticks(struct
>> xe_hw_engine *hwe)
>> {
>> struct xe_guc *guc = &hwe->gt->uc.guc;
>>
>> + if (!xe_guc_engine_activity_supported(guc))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> return get_engine_total_ticks(guc, hwe);
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * xe_guc_engine_activity_enable_stats - Enable engine activity stats
>> + * @guc: The GuC object
>> + *
>> + * Engine activity stats is supported from GuC submission version
>> + * (1.14.1)
>> + *
>> + * Return: true if engine activity stats supported, false otherwise
>> + */
>> +bool xe_guc_engine_activity_supported(struct xe_guc *guc)
>> +{
>> + if (GUC_SUBMIT_VER(guc) >= MAKE_GUC_VER(1, 14, 1))
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&guc_to_xe(guc)->drm,
>> + "Engine busyness not supported in this GuC version\n");
>
> A warn ON may be heavy. Can we live with just a debug print here?
i can replace it with a drm_warn_once which doesn't print the
stacktrace. I thought warn_on would be helpful to flag machines on CI
which doesn't have the required guc versions.
Can replace it with debug/info if not necessary
Thanks
Riana
>
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> /**
>> * xe_guc_engine_activity_enable_stats - Enable engine activity stats
>> * @guc: The GuC object
>> @@ -281,6 +306,9 @@ void xe_guc_engine_activity_enable_stats(struct
>> xe_guc *guc)
>> {
>> int ret;
>>
>> + if (!xe_guc_engine_activity_supported(guc))
>> + return;
>> +
>> ret = enable_engine_activity_stats(guc);
>> if (ret)
>> xe_gt_err(guc_to_gt(guc), "failed to enable activity
>> stats%d\n", ret);
>> @@ -307,6 +335,9 @@ int xe_guc_engine_activity_init(struct xe_guc *guc)
>> struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
>> int ret;
>>
>> + if (!xe_guc_engine_activity_supported(guc))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> ret = allocate_engine_activity_group(guc);
>> if (ret) {
>> xe_gt_err(gt, "failed to allocate activity group %d\n", ret);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_engine_activity.h b/drivers/
>> gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_engine_activity.h
>> index 6cd435b81bbe..e2c2f1bb2b59 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_engine_activity.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_engine_activity.h
>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ struct xe_hw_engine;
>> struct xe_guc;
>>
>> int xe_guc_engine_activity_init(struct xe_guc *guc);
>> +bool xe_guc_engine_activity_supported(struct xe_guc *guc);
>> void xe_guc_engine_activity_enable_stats(struct xe_guc *guc);
>> u64 xe_guc_engine_activity_active_ticks(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe);
>> u64 xe_guc_engine_activity_total_ticks(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe);
>> --
>> 2.47.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-27 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-06 7:55 [PATCH v3 00/10] PMU Support for per-engine-class activity Riana Tauro
2025-01-06 7:55 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] [DO NOT REVIEW] drm/xe/pmu: Enable PMU interface Riana Tauro
2025-01-06 7:55 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] [DO NOT REVIEW] drm/xe: Add locks in gtidle code Riana Tauro
2025-01-06 7:55 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] [DO NOT REVIEW] drm/xe/pmu: Add GT C6 events Riana Tauro
2025-01-06 7:55 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] [DO NOT REVIEW] drm/xe/pmu: Add GT frequency events Riana Tauro
2025-01-06 7:55 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] [DO NOT REVIEW] drm/xe/xe_pmu: add fixes for base PMU Riana Tauro
2025-01-06 7:55 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] drm/xe: Add per-engine-class activity support Riana Tauro
2025-01-06 7:55 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] drm/xe/trace: Add trace for engine activity Riana Tauro
2025-01-16 23:08 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-01-06 7:55 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] drm/xe/guc: Expose engine activity only for supported GuC version Riana Tauro
2025-01-16 23:10 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-01-27 10:05 ` Riana Tauro [this message]
2025-01-06 7:55 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] drm/xe/pmu: Add PMU support for per-engine-class activity Riana Tauro
2025-01-14 0:57 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-01-17 1:18 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-01-17 13:26 ` Riana Tauro
2025-01-06 7:55 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] drm/xe/guc: Bump minimum required GuC version to v70.36.0 Riana Tauro
2025-01-06 8:28 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for PMU Support for per-engine-class activity Patchwork
2025-01-06 8:29 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-01-06 8:30 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-01-06 8:48 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-01-06 8:50 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2025-01-06 8:52 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2025-01-06 9:18 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-01-06 17:10 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff840b0a-c693-4e6d-8097-6e4c08818100@intel.com \
--to=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com \
--cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=soham.purkait@intel.com \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
--cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox