Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Satyanarayana K V P" <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/xe: Prevent VF memory IRQ from accessing a torn-down engine
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 06:07:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-167710@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012055053.964468-6-satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] drm/xe: NULL pointer dereference due to incomplete locking in hw_engine_fini
--

commit 888f9d1be166404e1216f8d0d23505412e283b23
Author: Satyanarayana K V P <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>

drm/xe: Prevent VF memory IRQ from accessing a torn-down engine

This commit fixes a NULL pointer dereference by invalidating the engine
name and GT pointer during teardown in hw_engine_fini() under the
irq.lock, preventing the VF memory IRQ handler from scanning it.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c
> index 265f95c0c8993..55ee0c892c1e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -275,11 +275,22 @@ static const struct engine_info engine_infos[] = {
>  static void hw_engine_fini(void *arg)
>  {
>  	struct xe_hw_engine *hwe = arg;
> +	struct xe_gt *gt = hwe->gt;
> +
> +	if (gt) {
> +		struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> +		unsigned long flags;
>  
> -	if (hwe->exl_port)
> -		xe_execlist_port_destroy(hwe->exl_port);
> +		if (hwe->exl_port)
> +			xe_execlist_port_destroy(hwe->exl_port);
>  
> -	hwe->gt = NULL;
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&xe->irq.lock, flags);
> +		hwe->name = NULL;
> +		hwe->gt = NULL;

[Severity: High]
Can this still cause a NULL pointer dereference for lockless IOCTL callers?

Unprivileged userspace can call the DRM_IOCTL_XE_DEVICE_QUERY ioctl
(specifically query_engine_cycles) concurrently with device unbind or unplug.
Since the ioctl is not guarded by drm_dev_enter(), it can proceed
concurrently with devres_release_all() and hw_engine_fini().

The ioctl looks up the hardware engine via xe_gt_hw_engine() in
query_engine_cycles():

drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c:query_engine_cycles() {
    ...
    hwe = xe_gt_hw_engine(gt, user_to_xe_engine_class[eci->engine_class],
                          eci->engine_instance, true);
    if (!hwe)
        return -EINVAL;
    ...
}

Immediately after this check, hw_engine_fini() can execute and clear
hwe->gt = NULL (guarded only by xe->irq.lock, which the ioctl does not hold).

The ioctl then calls hwe_read_timestamp(), which dereferences hwe->gt:

drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c:hwe_read_timestamp() {
    struct xe_mmio *mmio = &hwe->gt->mmio;
    ...
}

Does this lockless path need additional protection against concurrent
teardown?

> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xe->irq.lock, flags);
> +	} else {
> +		hwe->name = NULL;
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  /**

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261012055053.964468-5-satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-12  6:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-12  5:50 [PATCH v5 0/3] Fix kernel crash during driver teardown Satyanarayana K V P
2026-10-12  5:50 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/xe: Prevent VF memory IRQ from accessing a torn-down engine Satyanarayana K V P
2026-10-12  6:07   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-12  8:29   ` Piotr Piórkowski
2026-10-12  5:50 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/xe/guc: Protect timeout handling from device unplug Satyanarayana K V P
2026-10-12  6:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12  5:50 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] drm/xe/gt: Disable GT reset worker before engine teardown Satyanarayana K V P
2026-10-12  8:40   ` Piotr Piórkowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-167710@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox