From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Raag Jadav" <raag.jadav@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] drm/xe/ras: Move xe_ras_process_errors() to xe_ras
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 11:22:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-169612@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013110439.181447-6-raag.jadav@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] xe_ras: boot-time wedge uevents are dropped before device registration
--
commit 7cc17054a629b3feb51763fdbe477fcbb6bc6ef3
Author: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
drm/xe/ras: Move xe_ras_process_errors() to xe_ras
This commit moves xe_ras_process_errors() from the end of the probe
sequence back to xe_ras_init(). This was done to revert a previous change
and process hardware errors detected before the driver was loaded.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index 23dfff89a4aa0..8d23e9cac3c67 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c
> index 922e5e793b135..8e399ffec9856 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -932,6 +932,13 @@ void xe_ras_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIEAER))
> ras_usp_aer_init(xe);
>
> + /*
> + * During probe, process and log any errors detected by firmware while the driver was not
> + * loaded. Critical errors such as Punit and CSC are reported through Pcode init failure,
> + * causing the driver to enter survivability mode.
> + */
> + xe_ras_process_errors(xe);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[Severity: Medium]
Will this silently drop boot-time wedge uevents?
Moving xe_ras_process_errors() to xe_ras_init() causes it to execute before
drm_dev_register() is called in the probe sequence.
If a hardware error is detected during early probe, xe_wedge_declare() in
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wedge.c will broadcast a wedge event to userspace:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wedge.c:xe_wedge_declare()
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c:drm_dev_wedged_event()
kobject_uevent_env()
Since the DRM device has not been added to sysfs yet, the KOBJ_CHANGE uevent
is silently dropped by the kobject core because dev->primary->kdev is not
fully registered. This means userspace automation will miss the WEDGED uevent.
> +
> ret = devm_device_add_group(xe->drm.dev, &gpu_health_group);
> if (ret)
> xe_err(xe, "Failed to create GPU health sysfs, err=%d\n", ret);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261013110439.181447-1-raag.jadav@intel.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 11:03 [PATCH v5 0/5] Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-10-13 11:03 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging Raag Jadav
2026-10-13 11:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 18:29 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-10-13 18:49 ` Matthew Brost
2026-10-14 4:25 ` Raag Jadav
2026-10-13 11:03 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] drm/xe: Drop xe_device_set_wedged_method() Raag Jadav
2026-10-13 11:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 18:30 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-10-13 11:03 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] drm/xe: Move xe_device_wedged_fini() registration to xe_device_probe_early() Raag Jadav
2026-10-13 11:03 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] drm/xe: Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-10-13 11:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 18:32 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-10-13 11:03 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] drm/xe/ras: Move xe_ras_process_errors() to xe_ras Raag Jadav
2026-10-13 11:22 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-13 11:12 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce xe_wedge (rev4) Patchwork
2026-10-13 11:14 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-10-13 15:40 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-10-13 23:38 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-169612@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox