From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Xiao Lu" <xiaolu.xie@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/dp: clear and restore MSTM_CTRL around MST DPMS off/on
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 08:12:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-178494@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020021714.62573-1-xiaolu.xie@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] drm/i915/dp: clearing MSTM_CTRL in intel_ddi_post_disable_dp() breaks MST
- [Medium] drm/i915/dp: race between mst_stream_pre_enable() and DPCD state verification
--
commit 04bc6df114f62ef11692debf152cd3af90ff9f8d
Author: Xiao Lu <xiaolu.xie@intel.com>
drm/i915/dp: clear and restore MSTM_CTRL around MST DPMS off/on
This patch clears DP_MST_EN and DP_UP_REQ_EN in DP_MSTM_CTRL before placing
the sink in D3 when the last MST stream is disabled, and restores them
after setting D0 when the first MST stream is re-enabled. It also teaches
intel_dp_mst_verify_dpcd_state() to accept DP_UPSTREAM_IS_SRC when no MST
streams are active so connector detection during DPMS off does not tear
down the MST topology.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> index a46ab5d3d70fc..6b7665206837a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -3163,6 +3163,9 @@ static void intel_ddi_post_disable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> * Power down sink before disabling the port, otherwise we end
> * up getting interrupts from the sink on detecting link loss.
> */
> + if (is_mst)
> + drm_dp_dpcd_write_byte(&intel_dp->aux, DP_MSTM_CTRL,
> + DP_UPSTREAM_IS_SRC);
> intel_dp_set_power(intel_dp, DP_SET_POWER_D3);
>
> if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 12) {
[Severity: High]
Does clearing DP_MST_EN and DP_UP_REQ_EN in intel_ddi_post_disable_dp()
break downstream MST hotplug detection and sideband transactions whenever
all MST streams are disabled?
When the last active MST stream is disabled via mst_stream_post_disable() ->
intel_ddi_post_disable_dp(), DP_MSTM_CTRL is written with
DP_UPSTREAM_IS_SRC while intel_dp->is_mst and intel_dp->mst.mgr.mst_state
remain true. DP_MSTM_CTRL is only restored in mst_stream_pre_enable() when
enabling a stream.
Per the DisplayPort specification for MSTM_CTRL, clearing DP_UP_REQ_EN and
DP_MST_EN stops the branch device from generating UP_REQ sideband messages
such as CONNECTION_STATUS_NOTIFY when downstream sinks are plugged in or
unplugged.
If the last connected downstream monitor on an MST hub is unplugged and
userspace disables its CRTC (dropping intel_dp->mst.active_streams to 0),
and a monitor is later plugged into the hub:
1. The branch device cannot send a CONNECTION_STATUS_NOTIFY UP_REQ because
DP_UP_REQ_EN and DP_MST_EN are cleared.
2. Even if an HPD pulse or manual probe runs intel_dp_detect() on the root
connector, intel_dp_mst_verify_dpcd_state() now returns true when
val == DP_UPSTREAM_IS_SRC and intel_dp_mst_active_streams(intel_dp) == 0,
and intel_dp_mst_configure() -> drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst() is a
no-op because mgr->mst_state is already true.
3. mst_connector_detect_ctx() -> drm_dp_mst_detect_port() only checks the
cached port->ddps (which stays 0), and because mst_stream_pre_enable()
is only called when enabling a stream on a connected connector,
DP_MSTM_CTRL is never restored.
Similarly, if a downstream monitor is plugged or unplugged during DPMS off,
waking an existing stream in mst_stream_pre_enable() calls
intel_mst_reprobe_topology():
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c:intel_mst_reprobe_topology() {
if (intel_mst_probed_link_params_valid(intel_dp,
crtc_state->port_clock, crtc_state->lane_count))
return;
drm_dp_mst_topology_queue_probe(&intel_dp->mst.mgr);
}
When link parameters are unchanged, this returns early without reprobing the
topology, so hotplug events missed while DP_UP_REQ_EN was cleared are not
recovered.
In addition, while active_streams == 0 and mgr->mst_state == true,
host-initiated sideband DOWN_REQ transactions remain reachable without
enabling a stream, such as mst_connector_get_modes() ->
mst_connector_get_ddc_modes() -> drm_dp_mst_edid_read() (which sends
REMOTE_I2C_READ), drm_dp_mst_link_probe_work(), and userspace AUX/I2C dev
nodes. With DP_MST_EN cleared in DP_MSTM_CTRL, won't the hub ignore
sideband DOWN_REQ messages and cause drm_dp_mst_wait_tx_reply() to fail or
time out?
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> index 7023619aaaba9..da3cf7493118d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> @@ -1270,8 +1270,12 @@ static void mst_stream_pre_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 12 && first_mst_stream &&
> !intel_dp_mst_is_master_trans(pipe_config));
>
> - if (first_mst_stream)
> + if (first_mst_stream) {
> intel_dp_set_power(intel_dp, DP_SET_POWER_D0);
> + drm_dp_dpcd_write_byte(&intel_dp->aux, DP_MSTM_CTRL,
> + DP_MST_EN | DP_UP_REQ_EN |
> + DP_UPSTREAM_IS_SRC);
> + }
>
> drm_dp_send_power_updown_phy(&intel_dp->mst.mgr, connector->mst.port, true);
>
> @@ -2254,6 +2258,14 @@ bool intel_dp_mst_verify_dpcd_state(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>
> ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read_byte(intel_dp->mst.mgr.aux, DP_MSTM_CTRL, &val);
>
> + /*
> + * MST mode is disabled while all MST streams are disabled, keeping
> + * UPSTREAM_IS_SRC set to tell this apart from a DPCD reset.
> + */
> + if (ret == 0 && val == DP_UPSTREAM_IS_SRC &&
> + intel_dp_mst_active_streams(intel_dp) == 0)
> + return true;
> +
> /* Adjust the expected register value for SST + SideBand. */
> if (ret < 0 || val != (DP_MST_EN | DP_UP_REQ_EN | DP_UPSTREAM_IS_SRC)) {
> drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
[Severity: Medium]
Can intel_dp_mst_verify_dpcd_state() race with mst_stream_pre_enable()
during a non-blocking atomic modeset and falsely tear down the MST topology?
In mst_stream_pre_enable(), intel_dp_mst_inc_active_streams(intel_dp)
increments intel_dp->mst.active_streams from 0 to 1 before calling
intel_dp_set_power(intel_dp, DP_SET_POWER_D0) (which performs AUX writes and
msleep(1) retries) and before restoring DP_MSTM_CTRL to
DP_MST_EN | DP_UP_REQ_EN | DP_UPSTREAM_IS_SRC:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c:mst_stream_pre_enable() {
...
first_mst_stream = intel_dp_mst_inc_active_streams(intel_dp);
drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 12 && first_mst_stream &&
!intel_dp_mst_is_master_trans(pipe_config));
if (first_mst_stream) {
intel_dp_set_power(intel_dp, DP_SET_POWER_D0);
drm_dp_dpcd_write_byte(&intel_dp->aux, DP_MSTM_CTRL,
DP_MST_EN | DP_UP_REQ_EN |
DP_UPSTREAM_IS_SRC);
}
...
}
When a non-blocking atomic commit (DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_NONBLOCK) re-enables the
first MST stream on display->wq.modeset, mode_config.connection_mutex is
not held while commit_work runs. If intel_dp_detect() runs concurrently on
intel_dp->attached_connector (via hotplug work, output poll, or
DRM_IOCTL_MODE_GETCONNECTOR), intel_dp_flush_connector_commits(connector)
only waits on intel_dp->attached_connector->base.state->commit, which is not
set for child MST connector commits.
If intel_dp_mst_verify_dpcd_state() runs after active_streams is incremented
to 1 (or reads DP_MSTM_CTRL just before mst_stream_pre_enable() writes it
and increments active_streams), it will see val == DP_UPSTREAM_IS_SRC while
intel_dp_mst_active_streams(intel_dp) == 1, return false, and cause
intel_dp_detect() to call intel_dp_mst_disconnect() in the middle of the
modeset enable sequence.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261020021714.62573-1-xiaolu.xie@intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-20 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 8:14 [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: clear and restore MSTM_CTRL around MST DPMS off/on Xiao Lu
2026-10-14 8:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 8:54 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-10-14 9:55 ` [PATCH] " Marco Nenciarini
2026-10-14 15:09 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2026-10-15 2:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-10-19 12:40 ` [PATCH] " Marco Nenciarini
2026-10-20 2:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Xiao Lu
2026-10-20 7:18 ` Marco Nenciarini
2026-10-20 8:11 ` Jani Nikula
2026-10-20 8:12 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-20 11:04 ` [PATCH v3] " Xiao Lu
2026-10-20 11:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 2:28 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/i915/dp: clear and restore MSTM_CTRL around MST DPMS off/on (rev2) Patchwork
2026-10-20 3:05 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-10-20 6:30 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-10-20 13:20 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/i915/dp: clear and restore MSTM_CTRL around MST DPMS off/on (rev3) Patchwork
2026-10-20 14:00 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-10-20 18:06 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-178494@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xiaolu.xie@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox