From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] drm/xe: Bump the LRU on a successful page fault
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 18:49:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-187040@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261027183638.1031299-3-matthew.brost@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] drm/xe: xe_vm_bump_lru() in xe_pagefault_handle_vma() misses private BOs
--
commit a6d00986d9f12583f84415e17fe0f940a218b2e7
Author: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
drm/xe: Bump the LRU on a successful page fault
This commit calls xe_vm_bump_lru() in xe_pagefault_handle_vma() after a
successful VMA rebind so that faulted BOs are moved to the tail of the TTM
LRU.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pagefault.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pagefault.c
> index 5247321c805ec..3719258aa6f09 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pagefault.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pagefault.c
> @@ -221,6 +221,8 @@ static int xe_pagefault_handle_vma(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_vma *vma,
> xe_pagefault_set_error(pf, XE_PAGEFAULT_ERROR_VMA_REBIND);
> break;
> }
> +
> + xe_vm_bump_lru(vm, &exec);
[Severity: Medium]
Does xe_vm_bump_lru() actually move VM-private BOs to the LRU tail when
handling a page fault?
When a VM-private BO is created for a fault-mode VM in
__xe_bo_create_locked(), it is not added to vm->lru_bulk_move:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:__xe_bo_create_locked() {
...
bo = xe_bo_init_locked(xe, bo, tile, vm ? xe_vm_resv(vm) : NULL,
vm && !xe_vm_in_fault_mode(vm) &&
flags & XE_BO_FLAG_USER ?
&vm->lru_bulk_move : NULL, size,
cpu_caching, type, flags, NULL, exec);
...
}
Because page faults only occur on fault-mode VMs, vm->lru_bulk_move is empty
and ttm_lru_bulk_move_tail(&vm->lru_bulk_move) in xe_vm_bump_lru() is a
no-op.
Furthermore, during xe_pagefault_begin() -> xe_vm_lock_vma(), only external
BOs (!bo->vm) are locked individually in exec, whereas VM-private BOs share
the VM's reservation object and only lock xe_vm_obj(vm):
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:xe_vm_lock_vma() {
...
err = drm_exec_lock_obj(exec, xe_vm_obj(vm));
if (!err && bo && !bo->vm)
err = drm_exec_lock_obj(exec, &bo->ttm.base);
...
}
When xe_vm_bump_lru() then iterates over the locked objects in exec, it skips
xe_vm_obj(vm):
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:xe_vm_bump_lru() {
...
drm_exec_for_each_locked_object(exec, obj) {
struct xe_bo *bo;
/* The VM's dummy resv object, not a BO. */
if (obj == xe_vm_obj(vm))
continue;
...
}
If a faulted VM-private BO's backing store is already in a compatible
placement so that ttm_bo_validate() returns early without moving the resource,
will the BO's TTM LRU position remain completely unchanged here?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261027183638.1031299-1-matthew.brost@intel.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-27 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-27 18:36 [PATCH v4 0/5] Add a minimum age gate to the shrinker + LRU fixes Matthew Brost
2026-10-27 18:36 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] drm/xe: Bump the LRU of every BO an exec touches Matthew Brost
2026-10-27 18:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 19:58 ` Matthew Brost
2026-10-27 18:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] drm/xe: Bump the LRU on a successful page fault Matthew Brost
2026-10-27 18:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-27 18:36 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] drm/xe: Leave the VM bulk move on BO release, not on GEM close Matthew Brost
2026-10-27 18:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 19:01 ` Matthew Brost
2026-10-27 19:40 ` Matthew Brost
2026-10-27 18:36 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] drm/ttm: Allow skipping to the next priority in the bo LRU cursor Matthew Brost
2026-10-27 18:36 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] drm/xe: Add a minimum age gate to the shrinker Matthew Brost
2026-10-27 19:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 18:47 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add a minimum age gate to the shrinker + LRU fixes Patchwork
2026-10-27 18:49 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-10-27 19:23 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-187040@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox