From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: mpenttil@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"Leon Romanovsky" <leonro@nvidia.com>,
"Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
"Balbir Singh" <balbirs@nvidia.com>, "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>, "Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 03/12] mm/hmm: preparations for HMM to participate in migration
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 06:17:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-196741@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103061629.972669-4-mpenttil@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] mm/hmm: memset() in hmm_range_fault_locked() wipes collected pfns on retry
- [Low] mm/hmm: build failure in hmm_range_fault_locked() when !CONFIG_MIGRATION
--
commit 9e255c525419b859ce3c5e39d7de2c6153874013
Author: Mika Penttilä <mpenttil@redhat.com>
mm/hmm: preparations for HMM to participate in migration
This commit prepares hmm_range_fault() to participate in page migration by
capturing the VMA during page table walks, managing MMU_NOTIFY_MIGRATE
invalidations, and clearing range->hmm_pfns at the start of migrating
faults.
> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> index 2f1e98c6b6440..9220e6648636d 100644
> --- a/mm/hmm.c
> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -694,19 +774,45 @@ static int hmm_range_fault_locked(struct hmm_range *range, bool *locked)
> {
> struct hmm_vma_walk hmm_vma_walk = {
> .range = range,
> - .locked = locked,
> + .mmlocked = locked,
> .last = range->start,
> };
> - struct mm_struct *mm = range->notifier->mm;
> + /*
> + * Could be serving a device fault or come from migrate
> + * entry point. For the former we have not resolved the vma
> + * yet, and the latter we don't have a notifier (but have a vma).
> + *
> + */
> + struct mm_struct *mm = hmm_range_fault_mm(range);
> int ret;
>
> + /* Migration is incompatible with mmap lock drop */
> + if (locked && hmm_select_migrate(range))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * Migration takes its requests only from default_flags, so the input
> + * pfns carry nothing. Clear them so that collected entries can be
> + * told apart reliably during the walk and on rollback.
> + */
> + if (hmm_select_migrate(range)) {
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(range->pfn_flags_mask);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(range->dev_private_owner !=
> + range->migrate->pgmap_owner);
[Severity: Low]
Will this break the build when CONFIG_HMM_MIRROR=y and CONFIG_MIGRATION=n?
Several Kconfig options (such as CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ON_DEMAND_PAGING and
CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU_USERPTR) select CONFIG_HMM_MIRROR without depending on
CONFIG_MIGRATION. In include/linux/hmm.h, struct migrate_vma is only
forward-declared, and in include/linux/migrate.h, its definition is guarded
by #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION while a stub is provided for
hmm_select_migrate() when !CONFIG_MIGRATION.
Even though hmm_select_migrate(range) returns 0 when CONFIG_MIGRATION is
disabled, the compiler still type-checks range->migrate->pgmap_owner inside
hmm_range_fault_locked() in mm/hmm.c and fails due to dereferencing a
pointer to an incomplete type.
Should this check be moved into a helper in include/linux/migrate.h with a
matching !CONFIG_MIGRATION stub?
> + memset(range->hmm_pfns, 0,
> + ((range->end - range->start) >> PAGE_SHIFT) *
> + sizeof(*range->hmm_pfns));
> + }
> +
> mmap_assert_locked(mm);
>
> do {
> /* If range is no longer valid force retry. */
> - if (mmu_interval_check_retry(range->notifier,
> - range->notifier_seq))
> - return -EBUSY;
> + if (range->notifier && mmu_interval_check_retry(range->notifier,
> + range->notifier_seq)) {
> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + break;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Can unconditionally calling memset() on range->hmm_pfns in
hmm_range_fault_locked() cause a self-deadlock on the folio lock or leak
locked folios when a migrating hmm_range_fault() call is retried after
-EBUSY?
When migration is enabled in this series with range->notifier set (such as
in dmirror_range_fault() in lib/test_hmm.c), walk_page_range() collects
present pages by locking each folio, elevating its reference count,
installing a migration PTE, and marking range->hmm_pfns[i] with
HMM_PFN_VALID | HMM_PFN_MIGRATE.
If a later page in the range needs a fault, walk_page_range() returns
HMM_FAULT_PENDING, hmm_vma_migrate_disarm() closes the MMU_NOTIFY_MIGRATE
invalidation, and hmm_do_fault() calls handle_mm_fault() while the
previously collected folios stay locked by current and mapped as migration
PTEs. If handle_mm_fault() or a concurrent operation triggers an MMU
notifier invalidation, mmu_interval_check_retry() on the next loop
iteration returns true and hmm_range_fault_locked() exits with -EBUSY (or
the caller retries after mmu_interval_read_retry() fails).
When the caller retries hmm_range_fault(range) with the same
range->hmm_pfns array, the unconditional memset(range->hmm_pfns, 0, ...) at
the top of hmm_range_fault_locked() wipes the HMM_PFN_VALID |
HMM_PFN_MIGRATE markers for the folios that are still locked and installed
as migration PTEs. On the retry walk, hmm_pfn_collected() will return false
for those entries, causing hmm_vma_handle_pte() or hmm_vma_walk_pmd() to
treat current's own migration entries as another task's migration entries
and wait in migration_entry_wait() on a folio already locked by current
(or leak the locked folios and migration PTEs if the caller aborts).
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261103061629.972669-1-mpenttil@redhat.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 6:16 [PATCH v17 00/12] migrate on fault for device pages mpenttil
2026-11-03 6:16 ` [PATCH v17 01/12] mm/Kconfig: changes for " mpenttil
2026-11-03 6:16 ` [PATCH v17 02/12] mm: add helper to convert HMM pfn to migrate pfn mpenttil
2026-11-03 6:16 ` [PATCH v17 03/12] mm/hmm: preparations for HMM to participate in migration mpenttil
2026-11-04 6:17 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-03 6:16 ` [PATCH v17 04/12] mm/hmm: do the plumbing " mpenttil
2026-11-04 6:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 6:16 ` [PATCH v17 05/12] mm/hmm: migrate collection in HMM pagewalk - pte level mpenttil
2026-11-04 6:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 6:16 ` [PATCH v17 06/12] mm/hmm: migrate collection in HMM pagewalk - pmd level mpenttil
2026-11-04 6:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 6:16 ` [PATCH v17 07/12] mm/hmm: add lazy MMU mode support for migration in HMM pagewalk mpenttil
2026-11-03 6:16 ` [PATCH v17 08/12] mm/hmm: implement rollback for device page " mpenttil
2026-11-04 6:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 6:16 ` [PATCH v17 09/12] mm: enable device page migration from " mpenttil
2026-11-04 6:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 6:16 ` [PATCH v17 10/12] lib/test_hmm: add a new testcase for the migrate on fault mpenttil
2026-11-04 6:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 6:16 ` [PATCH v17 11/12] Documentation/mm/hmm: document migration through hmm_range_fault() mpenttil
2026-11-04 6:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 6:16 ` [PATCH v17 12/12] drm/nouveau/svm: add support for migrate on fault mpenttil
2026-11-04 6:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 8:46 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Migrate on fault for device pages (rev9) Patchwork
2026-11-03 8:48 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-11-03 9:04 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2026-11-03 9:24 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2026-11-03 15:37 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-196741@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mpenttil@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox