From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mika Kuoppala" <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/20] drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce exec_queue events
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 14:16:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-205074@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109135549.4128280-9-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Low] drm/xe/eudebug: discover_client() counts non-debuggable queues
in eq_count
--
commit 926a26106604e590716ee8ab1001dab4ed5f0566
Author: Dominik Grzegorzek <dominik.grzegorzek@intel.com>
drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce exec_queue events
This commit adds eudebug resource creation and destruction events for
debuggable render and compute exec queues, both during live ioctls and
when discovering an existing client's resources.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_eudebug.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_eudebug.c
> index e0ef34588d3d4..0f8b0452f9bae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_eudebug.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_eudebug.c
[ ... ]
> +void xe_eudebug_exec_queue_create(struct xe_file *xef, struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> +{
> + struct xe_eudebug *d;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (!xe_engine_supports_eudebug(q->class))
> + return;
> +
> + d = xe_eudebug_get(xef);
> + if (!d)
> + return;
> +
> + err = exec_queue_create_event(d, xef, q);
> + if (err)
> + xe_eudebug_disconnect(d, err);
> +
> + xe_eudebug_put(d);
> +}
> +
> +void xe_eudebug_exec_queue_destroy(struct xe_file *xef, struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> +{
> + struct xe_eudebug *d;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (!xe_engine_supports_eudebug(q->class))
> + return;
> +
> + d = xe_eudebug_get(xef);
> + if (!d)
> + return;
> +
> + err = exec_queue_destroy_event(d, xef, q);
> + if (err)
> + xe_eudebug_disconnect(d, err);
> +
> + xe_eudebug_put(d);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * All the relevant ioctls that manipulate the xe_file resources eudebug
> * cares about are gated behind down_read(&xef->eudebug.ioctl_lock). The
> @@ -807,9 +1069,10 @@ void xe_eudebug_vm_destroy(struct xe_file *xef, struct xe_vm *vm)
> */
> static int discover_client(struct xe_eudebug *d, struct xe_file *xef)
> {
> + struct xe_exec_queue *q;
> struct xe_vm *vm;
> unsigned long i;
> - unsigned int vm_count = 0;
> + unsigned int vm_count = 0, eq_count = 0;
> int err = 0;
>
> lockdep_assert_held_write(&xef->eudebug.ioctl_lock);
> @@ -828,10 +1091,21 @@ static int discover_client(struct xe_eudebug *d, struct xe_file *xef)
> vm_count++;
> }
>
> + xa_for_each(&xef->exec_queue.xa, i, q) {
> + if (!xe_engine_supports_eudebug(q->class))
> + continue;
> +
> + err = exec_queue_create_event(d, xef, q);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> + eq_count++;
> + }
> +
> out:
> - if (vm_count)
> - eu_dbg(d, "Discovery found %u vms",
> - vm_count);
> + if (vm_count || eq_count)
> + eu_dbg(d, "Discovery found %u vms, %u exec_queues",
> + vm_count, eq_count);
[Severity: Low]
Does discover_client() count non-debuggable render and compute queues in
eq_count?
exec_queue_create_event() returns 0 without emitting an event when
!xe_exec_queue_is_debuggable(q), so any render or compute queue created
without DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_EUDEBUG still increments eq_count.
Checking xe_exec_queue_is_debuggable(q) in discover_client(), as well as
at the top of xe_eudebug_exec_queue_create() and
xe_eudebug_exec_queue_destroy(), would also avoid taking and dropping the
debugger reference for non-debuggable queues. Finally, the kernel-doc for
struct drm_xe_eudebug_event_exec_queue in include/uapi/drm/xe_drm_eudebug.h
could mention that only queues with DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_EUDEBUG
are reported, matching struct drm_xe_eudebug_event_vm.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261109135549.4128280-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 13:55 [PATCH 00/20] Intel Xe GPU Debug Support (eudebug) v11 Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 01/20] drm/ttm: Add ttm_bo_access_locked() Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 02/20] drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce eudebug interface Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 03/20] drm/xe/eudebug: Add documentation Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 04/20] drm/xe/eudebug: Add connection establishment documentation Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 05/20] drm/xe: Implement SR-IOV and eudebug exclusivity Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 06/20] drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce discovery for resources Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 07/20] drm/xe: Add EUDEBUG_ENABLE exec queue property Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 08/20] drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce exec_queue events Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 14:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 09/20] drm/xe/eudebug: Mark guc contexts as debuggable Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 10/20] drm/xe: Introduce ADD_DEBUG_DATA and REMOVE_DEBUG_DATA vm bind ops Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 11/20] drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce vm bind and vm bind debug data events Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 14:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 12/20] drm/xe/eudebug: Add ufence events with acks Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 14:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 13/20] drm/xe/eudebug: Add vm open/pread/pwrite Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 14:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 14/20] drm/xe/eudebug: Add userptr vm pread/pwrite Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 15/20] drm/xe/eudebug: Add hw enablement Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 16/20] drm/xe/eudebug: Track debuggable exec queues Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 17/20] drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce EU control interface Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 14:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 18/20] drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce per device attention scan worker Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 14:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 19/20] drm/xe/eudebug_test: Introduce eudebug live tests Mika Kuoppala
2026-11-09 13:55 ` [PATCH 20/20] drm/xe: Add xe_client_debugfs and introduce debug_data file Mika Kuoppala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-205074@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox