From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Umesh Nerlige Ramappa" <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] drm/xe/oa: Wait for in-flight OA batches before stream HW teardown
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 19:25:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-207653@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110190052.3514226-14-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [High] drm/xe/oa: context LRI batch fence in xe_oa_load_with_lri() is
never drained
- [High] drm/xe/oa: post-teardown HW programming when
xe_oa_stream_drain() times out
--
commit a42a6ce61696e1b256881421425e340fba9f094d
Author: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
drm/xe/oa: Wait for in-flight OA batches before stream HW teardown
This commit records the LRI batch fence in stream->last_fence and adds
xe_oa_stream_drain() to wait for stream->last_fence before tearing down
OA hardware state on stream destruction.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
> index 6383a2e036ab0..d2bd9622109af 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
> @@ -733,6 +733,12 @@ static void xe_oa_free_configs(struct xe_oa_stream *stream)
> dma_fence_put(stream->last_fence);
> }
>
> +static void xe_oa_update_last_fence(struct xe_oa_stream *stream, struct dma_fence *fence)
> +{
> + dma_fence_put(stream->last_fence);
> + stream->last_fence = dma_fence_get(fence);
> +}
> +
> static int xe_oa_load_with_lri(struct xe_oa_stream *stream, struct xe_oa_reg *reg_lri, u32 count)
> {
> struct dma_fence *fence;
> @@ -753,6 +759,7 @@ static int xe_oa_load_with_lri(struct xe_oa_stream *stream, struct xe_oa_reg *re
> goto free_bb;
> }
> xe_bb_free(bb, fence);
> + xe_oa_update_last_fence(stream, fence);
> dma_fence_put(fence);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -876,6 +883,23 @@ static void xe_oa_disable_metric_set(struct xe_oa_stream *stream)
> xe_mmio_rmw32(mmio, OAM_COMPRESSION_T3_CONTROL, OAM_LAT_MEASURE_ENABLE, 0);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Wait for the last OA batch of the stream, so that it can't program the HW after the HW
> + * teardown.
> + */
> +static void xe_oa_stream_drain(struct xe_oa_stream *stream)
> +{
> + struct xe_exec_queue *q = stream->exec_q ?: stream->k_exec_q;
> + long timeout;
> +
> + if (!stream->last_fence || dma_fence_is_signaled(stream->last_fence))
> + return;
> +
> + timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(q->sched_props.job_timeout_ms) + HZ;
> + if (!dma_fence_wait_timeout(stream->last_fence, false, timeout))
> + drm_err(&stream->oa->xe->drm, "Timed out waiting for OA batch\n");
> +}
[Severity: High]
Can an OA config batch still program the hardware after teardown when
dma_fence_wait_timeout() times out here?
When xe_oa_emit_oa_config() submits a batch with both an unsignaled input
sync and an output sync, xe_oa_submit_bb() attaches the input sync as a
scheduler dependency via xe_sync_entry_add_deps() and returns without
waiting. While that input sync remains unsignaled, the job sits in
q->entity before the scheduler's job_timeout_ms timer starts (or waits
behind earlier jobs on stream->exec_q).
If the stream is closed before the dependency signals,
xe_oa_stream_drain() times out after job_timeout_ms + HZ and returns
without killing the exec queue or canceling the job. Because the pending
xe_sched_job holds a reference on job->q and free_oa_config_bo() keeps
oa_bo->bb->bo alive until stream->last_fence signals, signaling the input
sync after xe_oa_stream_destroy() completes will still run the batch on
the hardware after xe_oa_stream_hw_teardown() has restored the OA
registers, dropped forcewake, and cleared u->exclusive_stream.
> /*
> * Also drops forcewake, which accesses the HW too. On a wedged device this is skipped and
> * the forcewake reference leaks, which is fine: the device needs a reset or rebind to
> @@ -914,6 +938,7 @@ static void xe_oa_stream_destroy(struct xe_oa_stream *stream)
> /* The poll timer may still be armed if the OA disable was skipped */
> hrtimer_cancel(&stream->poll_check_timer);
>
> + xe_oa_stream_drain(stream);
> if (!xe_wedged(stream->oa->xe))
> xe_oa_stream_hw_teardown(stream);
[Severity: High]
Does calling xe_oa_stream_drain() before xe_oa_stream_hw_teardown() leave
the context-restore LRI batch submitted during teardown undrained?
xe_oa_load_with_lri() is only reached via xe_oa_configure_oa_context().
During xe_oa_enable_metric_set(), the fence it stores in
stream->last_fence is immediately overwritten by the subsequent
xe_oa_emit_oa_config() call (or left undrained if xe_oa_emit_oa_config()
fails and jumps to err_put_k_exec_q). During teardown,
xe_oa_stream_hw_teardown() -> xe_oa_disable_metric_set() ->
xe_oa_configure_oa_context(stream, false) calls xe_oa_load_with_lri() and
updates stream->last_fence after xe_oa_stream_drain() has already run.
As a result, the LRI batch that clears OACTXCONTROL, OAR_OACONTROL or
OAC_OACONTROL, and RING_CONTEXT_CONTROL remains in flight on
stream->exec_q after forcewake is released, the OA buffer is unpinned and
freed, and the OA unit is released for reuse by a new stream.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110190052.3514226-9-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 19:00 [PATCH v5 0/7] Cleanup OA stream on PCI unbind/remove Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-11-10 19:00 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] drm/xe/oa: Use the drm device address_space for the OA stream fd Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-11-10 19:00 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] drm/xe/oa: Split OA stream destroy into HW teardown and resource release Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-11-10 19:00 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] drm/xe/oa: Take the runtime PM reference in xe_oa_destroy_locked() Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-11-10 19:00 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] drm/xe/oa: Skip OA HW teardown on a wedged device Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-11-10 19:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 19:00 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] drm/xe/oa: Wait for in-flight OA batches before stream HW teardown Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-11-10 19:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 19:00 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] drm/xe: Reject vm_ops->access on BO mappings of an unplugged device Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-11-10 19:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 19:01 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] drm/xe/oa: Quiesce OA streams on driver unbind and PCI reset Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-11-10 19:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 20:05 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Cleanup OA stream on PCI unbind/remove (rev5) Patchwork
2026-11-10 20:49 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-11-11 0:52 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-207653@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox