From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Notify userspace when crashlogs complete
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 02:19:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-210176@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c265bd093c23d96417cb5c6504938c90adc36ac9.1794444671.git.david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [High] platform/x86/intel/pmt: control_mutex lock inversion in
pmt_crashlog_probe()
--
commit ff673d94c967284b95f515a0ddd6add0a4afc80c
Author: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
platform/x86/intel/pmt: Notify userspace when crashlogs complete
This commit emits a KOBJ_CHANGE uevent on the crashlog device when a
completed crashlog is found at probe or after a manual trigger finishes
polling.
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/crashlog.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/crashlog.c
> index d7018b495217c..1796023a2f0e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/crashlog.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/crashlog.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -502,9 +616,17 @@ trigger_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>
> if (!trigger) {
> ret = pmt_crashlog_set_clear(crashlog);
> - return ret ?: count;
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + pmt_crashlog_end_poll(crashlog);
> + return count;
> }
>
> + /* reject triggers until probe has finished setting up this entry */
> + if (!crashlog->trigger_ready)
> + return -EBUSY;
[ ... ]
> @@ -661,7 +801,14 @@ static int pmt_crashlog_probe(struct auxiliary_device *auxdev,
> auxiliary_set_drvdata(auxdev, priv);
>
> for (i = 0; i < intel_vsec_dev->num_resources; i++) {
> - struct intel_pmt_entry *entry = &priv->entry[priv->num_entries].entry;
> + struct crashlog_entry *crashlog = &priv->entry[priv->num_entries];
> + struct intel_pmt_entry *entry = &crashlog->entry;
> +
> + /* trigger_store() rejects triggers until trigger_ready is set below */
> + INIT_WORK(&crashlog->pending_work, pmt_crashlog_pending_fn);
> + INIT_WORK(&crashlog->uevent_work, pmt_crashlog_uevent_fn);
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&crashlog->uevent_poll_work,
> + pmt_crashlog_uevent_poll_fn);
>
> ret = intel_pmt_dev_create(entry, &pmt_crashlog_ns, intel_vsec_dev, i);
> if (ret < 0)
> @@ -672,6 +819,27 @@ static int pmt_crashlog_probe(struct auxiliary_device *auxdev,
> priv->num_entries++;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Don't read crashlog registers from probe. The read may go through the
> + * parent's read_reg() callback, which can take a lock that the parent
> + * holds across intel_vsec_register() and so across a synchronous probe.
> + * From a work item, the read just waits for registration to finish.
> + *
> + * Enable triggers and queue the work only once every entry is created.
> + * abort_probe waits for the work items in pmt_crashlog_remove(), which
> + * would deadlock if one were already blocked on a lock held by our
> + * caller. For the same reason, a parent must not hold that lock while
> + * removing the device.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_entries; i++) {
> + struct crashlog_entry *crashlog = &priv->entry[i];
> +
> + scoped_guard(mutex, &crashlog->control_mutex)
> + crashlog->trigger_ready = true;
> +
> + queue_work(system_freezable_wq, &crashlog->pending_work);
> + }
[Severity: High]
Does taking crashlog->control_mutex in pmt_crashlog_probe() invert the lock
order against the parent's register-access lock?
When the parent holds its register lock across intel_vsec_register(),
pmt_crashlog_probe() takes crashlog->control_mutex under that lock, whereas
pmt_crashlog_pending_fn(), pmt_crashlog_uevent_poll_fn() and the sysfs
store handlers take crashlog->control_mutex first and then call
entry->cb->read_reg() or entry->cb->write_reg(). This triggers a lockdep
splat when pending_work runs, and because intel_pmt_dev_create() has
already exposed the sysfs attributes and emitted KOBJ_ADD in the first
loop, a concurrent sysfs store can ABBA deadlock with probe:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(parent_lock)
lock(&crashlog->control_mutex)
lock(&crashlog->control_mutex)
lock(parent_lock)
*** DEADLOCK ***
CPU0: intel_vsec_register() -> ... -> pmt_crashlog_probe()
CPU1: trigger_store() -> pmt_crashlog_disabled() -> entry->cb->read_reg()
In addition, trigger_store() calls pmt_crashlog_disabled() and (when
trigger is false) pmt_crashlog_set_clear() before checking
crashlog->trigger_ready, so a write to trigger during probe still accesses
registers and can clear the crashlog before setup finishes.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1794444671.git.david.e.box@linux.intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 2:08 [PATCH v3 0/1] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Notify userspace when crashlogs complete David E. Box
2026-11-12 2:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " David E. Box
2026-11-12 2:19 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-12 2:14 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for platform/x86/intel/pmt: Notify userspace when crashlogs complete (rev2) Patchwork
2026-11-12 2:17 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-11-12 2:50 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-11-12 9:09 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-210176@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox