From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arvind Yadav" <arvind.yadav@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] CI_ONLY: Hold a device reference across deferred VM
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 15:15:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-211419@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112150302.3837896-2-arvind.yadav@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [High] drm/xe: self-deadlock in vm_destroy_work_func() on
xe->destroy_wq
--
commit a82e5f7cac31a25d1e51cdc2f9e9c8bed2db07a4
Author: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
CI_ONLY: Hold a device reference across deferred VM
This commit acquires a drm_device reference in xe_vm_free() and releases
it at the end of vm_destroy_work_func() so the device remains valid across
deferred VM destruction.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> index dd855876f571c..d94a27db2cf40 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -2109,6 +2109,8 @@ static void vm_destroy_work_func(struct work_struct *w)
> xe_file_put(vm->xef);
>
> kfree(vm);
> +
> + drm_dev_put(&xe->drm);
> }
>
> static void xe_vm_free(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> @@ -2116,10 +2118,13 @@ static void xe_vm_free(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> struct xe_vm *vm = container_of(gpuvm, struct xe_vm, gpuvm);
>
> /*
> - * To destroy the VM we need to be able to sleep.
> - * drm_gpuvm keeps at least one device reference at this
> - * point so xe->destroy_wq must still be alive.
> + * drm_gpuvm drops its device reference as soon as this callback
> + * returns, but vm_destroy_work_func() still uses device state. Hold a
> + * reference across the deferred work.
> */
> + drm_dev_get(&vm->xe->drm);
> +
> + /* To destroy the VM we need to be able to sleep */
> queue_work(vm->xe->destroy_wq, &vm->destroy_work);
> }
[Severity: High]
Can dropping the last drm_device reference in vm_destroy_work_func()
self-deadlock on xe->destroy_wq?
When the freed VM holds the final device reference (for example, after PCI
device unbind), drm_gpuvm_free() drops its reference as soon as
xe_vm_free() returns, leaving the reference taken here as the last one.
When vm_destroy_work_func() runs on xe->destroy_wq and calls
drm_dev_put(&xe->drm), it synchronously triggers drm_dev_release() ->
drm_managed_release() -> xe_device_destroy():
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c:xe_device_destroy() {
...
if (xe->destroy_wq)
destroy_workqueue(xe->destroy_wq);
...
}
destroy_workqueue(xe->destroy_wq) then tries to drain xe->destroy_wq from
inside vm_destroy_work_func() running on that same workqueue, triggering a
lockdep recursive-locking warning and hanging forever waiting for the
current work item to finish.
As done in vma_destroy_cb(), vm->destroy_work should be queued on the
module-wide destroy workqueue via xe_destroy_wq_queue(&vm->destroy_work);
a later patch in this series, commit "CI-ONLY:Defer VM teardown until exec
queue cleanup", makes that change, which is needed here to avoid breaking
bisectability.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112150302.3837896-1-arvind.yadav@intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 15:02 [PATCH 0/3] CI-ONLY Fix VM teardown and migration queue recovery Arvind Yadav
2026-11-12 15:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] CI_ONLY: Hold a device reference across deferred VM Arvind Yadav
2026-11-12 15:15 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-12 15:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] CI_ONLY Mark VMs as closing before queue cleanup Arvind Yadav
2026-11-12 15:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] CI-ONLY:Defer VM teardown until exec " Arvind Yadav
2026-11-12 15:38 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for CI-ONLY Fix VM teardown and migration queue recovery Patchwork
2026-11-12 16:22 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-211419@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=arvind.yadav@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox