From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: tilak.tirumalesh.tangudu@intel.com, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/xe: Add has_sem64 bit to graphics/media IP descriptors
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 16:20:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-213185@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261113155734.4164230-2-tilak.tirumalesh.tangudu@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [Medium] drm/xe: missing has_sem64 in graphics_xe3p_xpc disables sem64
on 35.11 and 35.03
- [Low] drm/xe: commit message mismatch with has_sem64 resolution in
xe_info_init()
--
commit aa9a045209e3c606e5aa5ffac66c1d9a9153a146
Author: Tangudu Tilak Tirumalesh <tilak.tirumalesh.tangudu@intel.com>
drm/xe: Add has_sem64 bit to graphics/media IP descriptors
This commit adds a has_sem64 capability bit to the graphics and media IP
descriptors and populates gt->info.has_sem64 for Xe3p platforms.
> The bit indicates whether the GT's command streamer supports the
> MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT_64 instruction. A platform's CS must not mix
> MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT and MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT_64 within a context or across
> context submissions, so both the primary and media GT must agree before
> either one enables sem64; resolve has_sem64 once in xe_info_init() and
> hand the single value to both GT allocators.
[Severity: Low]
Does the commit message match how has_sem64 is resolved?
alloc_primary_gt() and alloc_media_gt() each compute gt->info.has_sem64
independently from their IP descriptor and stepping, and xe_info_init()
afterwards clears both fields if either GT does not support it, rather
than resolving a single value in xe_info_init() and passing it to the GT
allocators.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> index 7fba5295c33e6..5a147a577a098 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ static const struct xe_graphics_desc graphics_xe3p_lpg = {
> .multi_queue_engine_class_mask = BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY) | BIT(XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE),
> .num_geometry_xecore_fuse_regs = 3,
> .num_compute_xecore_fuse_regs = 3,
> + .has_sem64 = 1,
> };
>
> static const struct xe_graphics_desc graphics_xe3p_xpc = {
> @@ -153,11 +154,20 @@ static const struct xe_media_desc media_xelpmp = {
> .hw_engine_mask =
> GENMASK(XE_HW_ENGINE_VCS7, XE_HW_ENGINE_VCS0) |
> GENMASK(XE_HW_ENGINE_VECS3, XE_HW_ENGINE_VECS0) |
> - BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_GSCCS0)
> + BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_GSCCS0),
> +};
> +
> +static const struct xe_media_desc media_xe3p_lpm = {
> + .hw_engine_mask =
> + GENMASK(XE_HW_ENGINE_VCS7, XE_HW_ENGINE_VCS0) |
> + GENMASK(XE_HW_ENGINE_VECS3, XE_HW_ENGINE_VECS0) |
> + BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_GSCCS0),
> + .has_sem64 = 1,
> };
>
> static const struct xe_media_desc media_xe3p_hpm = {
> .has_uncorrectable_error_reporting = 1,
> + .has_sem64 = 1,
[Severity: Medium]
Should graphics_xe3p_xpc also set .has_sem64 = 1?
alloc_primary_gt() scopes the stepping B0 check to GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) ==
3510 (graphics_xe3p_lpg), and media_xe3p_hpm (35.03) enables has_sem64.
Because graphics_xe3p_xpc (35.11) omits .has_sem64 = 1,
tile->primary_gt->info.has_sem64 is false on Xe3p_XPC platforms, and the
cross-GT check in xe_info_init() then clears
tile->media_gt->info.has_sem64 on the paired Xe3p_HPM media GT as well,
leaving sem64 disabled on both GTs.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261113155734.4164230-1-tilak.tirumalesh.tangudu@intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-13 15:57 [PATCH 0/4] drm/xe: Use MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT_64 (Wa_16029281913) tilak.tirumalesh.tangudu
2026-11-13 15:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/xe: Add has_sem64 bit to graphics/media IP descriptors tilak.tirumalesh.tangudu
2026-11-13 16:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-13 15:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/xe: Add MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT_64 instruction definition tilak.tirumalesh.tangudu
2026-11-13 15:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe: Use MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT_64 for fake watchdog where supported tilak.tirumalesh.tangudu
2026-11-13 15:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/xe: Use MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT_64 in ULLS postamble " tilak.tirumalesh.tangudu
2026-11-13 16:34 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Use MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT_64 (Wa_16029281913) (rev3) Patchwork
2026-11-13 16:36 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-11-13 17:09 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-213185@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tilak.tirumalesh.tangudu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox