From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-dy2-f42.google.com (mail-dy2-f42.google.com [74.125.229.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CDE63115A2 for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2026 22:06:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.229.42 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790460367; cv=none; b=N8mYKYt/DRawoCRere2V3zmExr6sh+4WSEZETTJ8n6tNZpK/SI80+RFQm7Z0Oc8b7mKfkKXHOaDRPztp0KcIW1SnXBIZEvDq0mVubD5xPCBWEwQOcb2hgC+7VotMLmlfIvQinkVSjiEXF1zFD9JzdwoCOj0Tm0EA4lDJEnU91Xc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790460367; c=relaxed/simple; bh=N/1i0aW1odxhGXfEf4EXAt4qOVmlLhrC/9Z7m3r2V7c=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=s+32EUVwc/OFUcea3gjvS8IlW5V2o6kobzgFVq8UzNY6Mz4xoAD8+1wTqgmOsCHrpMmDQCpByMURzBuUHU3JvGY1ZhIScLuennPUwaJq6cgP6jGWrSavUAMaHKKZFHb6iVUaC52lVNP5mhKrrr/pLLcodB7dFde1rBL/gsHcgI8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.dk; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.dk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.b=AQPBvn/p; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.229.42 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.dk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.dk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.b="AQPBvn/p" Received: by mail-dy2-f42.google.com with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-3411e0ace58so2555640eec.0 for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2026 15:06:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20251104.gappssmtp.com; s=20251104; t=1790460364; x=1791065164; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=ZOSmoR2B28yyOUfdoDxFKrF9d5+8BJe7EzDO03OaefY=; b=AQPBvn/pN2ckQHUYF3WKC5CK0M9uckDQI/TQQoOD3s6tJB5yrBPQ00Mr2Zkfzm0Zgj D1ktdPg6qL9HxY6bBm2IXTLhh4pio/5++FV7VCGwGbJUDmfZT45P2N7zs5/a8nBmPpXZ 96a02dZfOUYJhw/HJZI/tT8MUo57mLV8XoIaVxiFzJu2YDZbmdjgPXskbZGzEc4GB/I6 fECiYOP6rS/Bg6SPM9pqpkojLdju4ZIVc7G3ulbIXZcDHrcowF5TKfDOHauKl1bKi4On ovez7ZXMYnPJIJo9njJQysEF0rieln5SazT61lgmGC++kOhFcwSnLbTxvd2nVdbL8wOv SKow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1790460364; x=1791065164; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=ZOSmoR2B28yyOUfdoDxFKrF9d5+8BJe7EzDO03OaefY=; b=RXeLCHWAqas1Rfm6hU1Q+pQUfoLwxj/FihU4KfdkkAaLsDfP1i5Mv78dTPWkFsSpmv nybZQnBvEL1nG3E5YxY0NG+JuIYW0KAb6SrSegRJc2gCmyqjuv3195V12T/cS845Fp+Z aDEPIoryJjiX7OHx2XkfpHQ+hjKX1jCQexhs0/SNfJEyZ4D+fnCU62kHkm3xeWSfzuwv HibFzey7ABJ44TGl6gveKsLfeUY6AyYaxcKQSFaFuV0Y7tz0IKs4PI5vgSVRRKoSo2zj zI8NxmYyrx/1n/d88Wxoh7qjyQXVpLk50E1Ug8jPaOyFwyREQKdn62pt2LrbpwjcytQ7 6YnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++kGjJ+I1U6+gbmYMxC0IUd/8L8/v22PO53f/sBo8f/mmYJPT942 TjENhIqsFWdaJw1m/NSs1qOGbwpAmJgKUJFt9NjgetfN5+dQXxdoV7kcGx1mXFd4wro= X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou17NIYKuOW9kElcrAtocskSCTCpSgC9LQ8G3efhoW2MzjtWI46lUjNR9sXqVwc 5PwQtxTvRFBWrriE+NgKMt3/YNpVX0oN6vn/PpvdcSMGvW6C9k8ckDu4OAkkHxsj+RuAcIuyr6j TEqUv8uV68yQ7QK5QqnVFGdoo4/TXqLVfFvfWCVHNuuRXR6KxHc6yqnp8PH6x1qyyQKvUpXAmep 7JJ7DiRaxvz/ypXT59MH39UNJAkoBWhE6PGfhPsqc7uaTyCC7VaRNLAQvA07d5RHVfiab8+TJlk zy8GT1iUhsJCLyTNY4vJ9XU/YsUbfMAb+CEoLTh0+KIX0e/GlW2Y8xVdMOWtI1oTPdp+lEd3pLD 91okO33De0okgV4YgA2Yn76n2KdDevAlooiPeIB+ERavH2i4R2FDI+PIfBZVFj5cmFs2Qci+2+5 1VpzF0aLKI86bjFYr871xs196BtkxfSNOwiTTsuWryrmgtKkFc7B77998h8KBbvR9Pj0Bx0MyJa mCLVl5T9Z2Izy+xma3kTUdzSqetHoGaEgESYhboX8hZSNWIjMUgl/0evjg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:7301:1f15:b0:33b:bfb7:31cc with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-342710ae1f0mr5938887eec.16.1790460363804; Sat, 26 Sep 2026 15:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.106] ([198.8.77.135]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5a478bee46e88-341447576b9sm19647203eec.15.2026.09.26.15.06.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 26 Sep 2026 15:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <0367c089-a2da-42ad-ae9f-fc61dd220d1a@kernel.dk> Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2026 16:06:02 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] io_uring: thread identity handoff for blocking inline issue To: Ming Lei Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org References: <20260911154148.644489-1-axboe@kernel.dk> Content-Language: en-US From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/26/26 10:04 AM, Ming Lei wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 09:40:50AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> Hi, >> > > ... > >> >> This is obviously an RFC, in terms of what I'd love people to take a >> closer look at: >> >> - The scheduler hook and the identity move itself, kernel/thread_handoff.c. >> Is the set of refused states complete enough, and is moving >> thread group leadership this way (the leader must stay first on >> ->thread_head, like de_thread() keeps it) acceptable / kosher. >> - The x86 and arm64 register state handling. x86 refuses AMX users, >> and arm64 refuses SME. >> - Whether anyone relies on a task's user identity staying on one >> task_struct in ways not covered above in the series. > > This way may break ublk server given 'task_struct *' can be changed > because the server issues blocking OP(fallocate, ...), then the > `current` check in ublk_dispatch_req() can be hit. Yep, which is why is isn't enabled there. > Also there is risk in 'task_struct *' keyed bpf task storage. > > task_work queuing could become tricky too. Like the above, the series does attempt to handle that. -- Jens Axboe