From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] io_uring: drop 'ctx' ref on task work cancelation
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:25:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200914162555.1502094-3-axboe@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200914162555.1502094-1-axboe@kernel.dk>
If task_work ends up being marked for cancelation, we go through a
cancelation helper instead of the queue path. In converting task_work to
always hold a ctx reference, this path was missed. Make sure that
io_req_task_cancel() puts the reference that is being held against the
ctx.
Fixes: 6d816e088c35 ("io_uring: hold 'ctx' reference around task_work queue + execute")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index be9d628e7854..01756a131be6 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1787,8 +1787,10 @@ static void __io_req_task_cancel(struct io_kiocb *req, int error)
static void io_req_task_cancel(struct callback_head *cb)
{
struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(cb, struct io_kiocb, task_work);
+ struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
__io_req_task_cancel(req, -ECANCELED);
+ percpu_ref_put(&ctx->refs);
}
static void __io_req_task_submit(struct io_kiocb *req)
--
2.28.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-14 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-14 16:25 [PATCHSET 0/5] io_uring fixes for 5.9 Jens Axboe
2020-09-14 16:25 ` [PATCH 1/5] io_uring: grab any needed state during defer prep Jens Axboe
2020-09-19 15:27 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-09-19 16:56 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-02 16:14 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-02 16:34 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-02 17:01 ` Jens Axboe
2020-10-02 17:08 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-02 17:09 ` Jens Axboe
2020-10-02 17:14 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-09-14 16:25 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-09-14 16:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: don't run task work on an exiting task Jens Axboe
2020-09-14 16:25 ` [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: don't re-setup vecs/iter in io_resumit_prep() is already there Jens Axboe
2020-09-14 16:25 ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: don't use retry based buffered reads for non-async bdev Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200914162555.1502094-3-axboe@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox