public inbox for io-uring@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lee@kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 005/105] io_uring: Use original task for req identity in io_identity_cow()
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 18:09:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220727161012.279068616@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220727161012.056867467@linuxfoundation.org>

From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>

This issue is conceptually identical to the one fixed in 29f077d07051
("io_uring: always use original task when preparing req identity"), so
rather than reinvent the wheel, I'm shamelessly quoting the commit
message from that patch - thanks Jens:

 "If the ring is setup with IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL and we have more than
  one task doing submissions on a ring, we can up in a situation where
  we assign the context from the current task rather than the request
  originator.

  Always use req->task rather than assume it's the same as current.

  No upstream patch exists for this issue, as only older kernels with
  the non-native workers have this problem."

Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 5c3462cfd123b ("io_uring: store io_identity in io_uring_task")
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/io_uring.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1325,7 +1325,7 @@ static void io_req_clean_work(struct io_
  */
 static bool io_identity_cow(struct io_kiocb *req)
 {
-	struct io_uring_task *tctx = current->io_uring;
+	struct io_uring_task *tctx = req->task->io_uring;
 	const struct cred *creds = NULL;
 	struct io_identity *id;
 



           reply	other threads:[~2022-07-27 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <20220727161012.056867467@linuxfoundation.org>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220727161012.279068616@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox