From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH mm-stable RFC 0/2] mm/nommu: don't use VM_MAYSHARE for MAP_PRIVATE mappings
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 17:30:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221219163013.259423-1-david@redhat.com> (raw)
Trying to reduce the confusion around VM_SHARED and VM_MAYSHARE first
requires !CONFIG_MMU to stop using VM_MAYSHARE for MAP_PRIVATE mappings.
CONFIG_MMU only sets VM_MAYSHARE for MAP_SHARED mappings.
This paves the way for further VM_MAYSHARE and VM_SHARED cleanups: for
example, renaming VM_MAYSHARED to VM_MAP_SHARED to make it cleaner what
is actually means.
Let's first get the weird case out of the way and not use VM_MAYSHARE in
MAP_PRIVATE mappings, using a new VM_MAYOVERLAY flag instead.
I am not a NOMMU expert, but my basic testing with risc64-nommu with
buildroot under QEMU revealed no surprises.
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
David Hildenbrand (2):
mm/nommu: factor out check for NOMMU shared mappings into
is_nommu_shared_mapping()
mm/nommu: don't use VM_MAYSHARE for MAP_PRIVATE mappings
drivers/char/mem.c | 2 +-
fs/cramfs/inode.c | 2 +-
fs/proc/task_nommu.c | 2 +-
fs/ramfs/file-nommu.c | 2 +-
fs/romfs/mmap-nommu.c | 2 +-
include/linux/mm.h | 20 ++++++++++++++
io_uring/io_uring.c | 2 +-
mm/nommu.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
8 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
--
2.38.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-12-19 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-19 16:30 David Hildenbrand [this message]
2022-12-19 16:30 ` [PATCH mm-stable RFC 1/2] mm/nommu: factor out check for NOMMU shared mappings into is_nommu_shared_mapping() David Hildenbrand
2022-12-19 16:30 ` [PATCH mm-stable RFC 2/2] mm/nommu: don't use VM_MAYSHARE for MAP_PRIVATE mappings David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221219163013.259423-1-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox