public inbox for io-uring@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
	ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 08/12] io_uring: support OP_READ/OP_WRITE for fused slave request
Date: Wed,  1 Mar 2023 22:06:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230301140611.163055-9-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230301140611.163055-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

Start to allow fused slave request to support OP_READ/OP_WRITE, and
the buffer can be retrieved from master request.

Once the slave request is completed, the master buffer will be returned
back.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 io_uring/opdef.c |  2 ++
 io_uring/rw.c    | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/io_uring/opdef.c b/io_uring/opdef.c
index 63b90e8e65f8..f044629e5475 100644
--- a/io_uring/opdef.c
+++ b/io_uring/opdef.c
@@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ const struct io_issue_def io_issue_defs[] = {
 		.ioprio			= 1,
 		.iopoll			= 1,
 		.iopoll_queue		= 1,
+		.fused_slave		= 1,
 		.prep			= io_prep_rw,
 		.issue			= io_read,
 	},
@@ -248,6 +249,7 @@ const struct io_issue_def io_issue_defs[] = {
 		.ioprio			= 1,
 		.iopoll			= 1,
 		.iopoll_queue		= 1,
+		.fused_slave		= 1,
 		.prep			= io_prep_rw,
 		.issue			= io_write,
 	},
diff --git a/io_uring/rw.c b/io_uring/rw.c
index 4c233910e200..36d31a943317 100644
--- a/io_uring/rw.c
+++ b/io_uring/rw.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include "kbuf.h"
 #include "rsrc.h"
 #include "rw.h"
+#include "fused_cmd.h"
 
 struct io_rw {
 	/* NOTE: kiocb has the file as the first member, so don't do it here */
@@ -371,6 +372,17 @@ static struct iovec *__io_import_iovec(int ddir, struct io_kiocb *req,
 	size_t sqe_len;
 	ssize_t ret;
 
+	/*
+	 * SLAVE OP passes buffer offset from sqe->addr actually, since
+	 * the fused cmd kbuf's mapped start address is zero.
+	 */
+	if (req->flags & REQ_F_FUSED_SLAVE) {
+		ret = io_import_kbuf_for_slave(rw->addr, rw->len, ddir, iter, req);
+		if (ret)
+			return ERR_PTR(ret);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
 	if (opcode == IORING_OP_READ_FIXED || opcode == IORING_OP_WRITE_FIXED) {
 		ret = io_import_fixed(ddir, iter, req->imu, rw->addr, rw->len);
 		if (ret)
@@ -428,11 +440,19 @@ static inline loff_t *io_kiocb_ppos(struct kiocb *kiocb)
  */
 static ssize_t loop_rw_iter(int ddir, struct io_rw *rw, struct iov_iter *iter)
 {
+	struct io_kiocb *req = cmd_to_io_kiocb(rw);
 	struct kiocb *kiocb = &rw->kiocb;
 	struct file *file = kiocb->ki_filp;
 	ssize_t ret = 0;
 	loff_t *ppos;
 
+	/*
+	 * Fused slave req hasn't user buffer, so ->read/->write can't
+	 * be supported
+	 */
+	if (req->flags & REQ_F_FUSED_SLAVE)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	/*
 	 * Don't support polled IO through this interface, and we can't
 	 * support non-blocking either. For the latter, this just causes
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-01 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-01 14:05 [RFC PATCH 00/12] io_uring: add IORING_OP_FUSED_CMD Ming Lei
2023-03-01 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] io_uring: increase io_kiocb->flags into 64bit Ming Lei
2023-03-01 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] io_uring: define io_mapped_ubuf->acct_pages as unsigned integer Ming Lei
2023-03-01 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] io_uring: extend io_mapped_ubuf to cover external bvec table Ming Lei
2023-03-01 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] io_uring: rename io_mapped_ubuf as io_mapped_buf Ming Lei
2023-03-01 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] io_uring: export 'struct io_mapped_buf' for fused cmd buffer Ming Lei
2023-03-01 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] io_uring: add IO_URING_F_FUSED and prepare for supporting OP_FUSED_CMD Ming Lei
2023-03-01 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] io_uring: add IORING_OP_FUSED_CMD Ming Lei
2023-03-01 14:06 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2023-03-01 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] io_uring: support OP_SEND_ZC/OP_RECV for fused slave request Ming Lei
2023-03-01 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] block: ublk_drv: mark device as LIVE before adding disk Ming Lei
2023-03-03  2:25   ` Ziyang Zhang
2023-03-01 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] block: ublk_drv: add common exit handling Ming Lei
2023-03-03  2:15   ` Ziyang Zhang
2023-03-01 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] block: ublk_drv: apply io_uring FUSED_CMD for supporting zero copy Ming Lei
2023-03-03  2:52 ` [RFC PATCH 00/12] io_uring: add IORING_OP_FUSED_CMD Ziyang Zhang
2023-03-03  3:01   ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230301140611.163055-9-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bschubert@ddn.com \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox