From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] io_uring/kbuf: protect io_buffer_list teardown with a reference
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 07:52:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240403135602.1623312-4-axboe@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240403135602.1623312-1-axboe@kernel.dk>
No functional changes in this patch, just in preparation for being able
to keep the buffer list alive outside of the ctx->uring_lock.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.4+
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
io_uring/kbuf.c | 15 +++++++++++----
io_uring/kbuf.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/kbuf.c b/io_uring/kbuf.c
index 011280d873e7..2edc6854f6f3 100644
--- a/io_uring/kbuf.c
+++ b/io_uring/kbuf.c
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ static int io_buffer_add_list(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
* always under the ->uring_lock, but the RCU lookup from mmap does.
*/
bl->bgid = bgid;
+ atomic_set(&bl->refs, 1);
return xa_err(xa_store(&ctx->io_bl_xa, bgid, bl, GFP_KERNEL));
}
@@ -265,6 +266,14 @@ static int __io_remove_buffers(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
return i;
}
+static void io_put_bl(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_buffer_list *bl)
+{
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&bl->refs)) {
+ __io_remove_buffers(ctx, bl, -1U);
+ kfree_rcu(bl, rcu);
+ }
+}
+
void io_destroy_buffers(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
struct io_buffer_list *bl;
@@ -274,8 +283,7 @@ void io_destroy_buffers(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
xa_for_each(&ctx->io_bl_xa, index, bl) {
xa_erase(&ctx->io_bl_xa, bl->bgid);
- __io_remove_buffers(ctx, bl, -1U);
- kfree_rcu(bl, rcu);
+ io_put_bl(ctx, bl);
}
/*
@@ -680,9 +688,8 @@ int io_unregister_pbuf_ring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg)
if (!bl->is_buf_ring)
return -EINVAL;
- __io_remove_buffers(ctx, bl, -1U);
xa_erase(&ctx->io_bl_xa, bl->bgid);
- kfree_rcu(bl, rcu);
+ io_put_bl(ctx, bl);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/io_uring/kbuf.h b/io_uring/kbuf.h
index fdbb10449513..8b868a1744e2 100644
--- a/io_uring/kbuf.h
+++ b/io_uring/kbuf.h
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ struct io_buffer_list {
__u16 head;
__u16 mask;
+ atomic_t refs;
+
/* ring mapped provided buffers */
__u8 is_buf_ring;
/* ring mapped provided buffers, but mmap'ed by application */
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-03 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-03 13:52 [PATCHSET 0/4] Cleanup io_buffer_list and mmap handling Jens Axboe
2024-04-03 13:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] io_uring/kbuf: get rid of lower BGID lists Jens Axboe
2024-04-03 13:52 ` [PATCH 2/4] io_uring/kbuf: get rid of bl->is_ready Jens Axboe
2024-04-03 13:52 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2024-04-03 13:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] io_uring/kbuf: hold io_buffer_list reference over mmap Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240403135602.1623312-4-axboe@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox