From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0C2618B465; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 09:28:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728466116; cv=none; b=k25v6krebsqN0msLvqiiNYxzQ16lldyKLFeIpAOXMYCuvqmuW7aSHq3KvQ2cMzu7y2iGb4DoqEfrkP2cQKwqkZDW0L6vH4Mj/EKrNU9zkfL5/pQr8VNqXwXKrp2ALSwST4/SPdBuWMZ7fqI/dxOrCxq9vM5OfAre+/A4+JGAgsA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728466116; c=relaxed/simple; bh=59B6D4eY1sw8iViJUckmsksPUvkarjEJKHHC0dKMbsk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ETZIAvw53AkR5cox3RYLvPIruCEPW8NFcGMB6HuIymL1BSI+kb1FZ/gXtnBp2SWF3wBmMf4tm/QhMzF9j6y3DU8XIvh+70TjrduME0ipv9wCey/989j8Q1DR7UZMhnt5xC85qpwxye57likp4QBX5Hk9yUf0ldgCvPpPz35hdCg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 6B9C2227A8E; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 11:28:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 11:28:28 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Keith Busch Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gonz=E1lez?= , Jens Axboe , "Martin K. Petersen" , Kanchan Joshi , hare@suse.de, sagi@grimberg.me, brauner@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, jaegeuk@kernel.org, bcrl@kvack.org, dhowells@redhat.com, bvanassche@acm.org, asml.silence@gmail.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, gost.dev@samsung.com, vishak.g@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] FDP and per-io hints Message-ID: <20241009092828.GA18118@lst.de> References: <20241004053121.GB14265@lst.de> <20241004061811.hxhzj4n2juqaws7d@ArmHalley.local> <20241004062733.GB14876@lst.de> <20241004065233.oc5gqcq3lyaxzjhz@ArmHalley.local> <20241004123027.GA19168@lst.de> <20241007101011.boufh3tipewgvuao@ArmHalley.local> <20241008122535.GA29639@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 08:44:28AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > Then let's just continue with patches 1 and 2. They introduce no new > user or kernel APIs, and people have already reported improvements using > it. They are still not any way actually exposing the FDP functionality in the standard though. How is your application going to align anything to the reclaim unit? Or is this another of the cases where as a hyperscaler you just "know" from the data sheet? But also given that the submitter completely disappeared and refuses to even discuss his patches I thing they are simply abandonware at this point anyway.