From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A59228643A for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2025 22:05:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756332319; cv=none; b=Z1BAvlkDmUwgiscLd6bMa1NLD3YEzYSbnZh/Ph3ViJGW6ZaJXSsQANjwOGgjlRdxOVXP7fNS2WcUoyfX8KPqPFf4DI1Yqj4dIyAk7bFPXYkzHpaphq+ixKpvDjETVzIT5Pgo2ZHUnSgvVeit132knnHyHwWmskMueQcFqi9J8ow= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756332319; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WvWB4CAiWB7AQTYVN+JD1sK8B6mRbJLSGgHycU5+K0Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=ZlUaSR/7BmXLdl0Ig60n7y8YO7Gildk9+JEbI35fwT3jxS3mif95cENiizwGPl7aMzH0wfVb1U8GY5MO7O7QIf3yFJnZR+IV0dtNk/ygpkuQIcfPFm8yG5zpkWXY1Zrk8ZlOz3Q7Qhz28YwxvT+hLb8PbbEZzAandiDd4B9AQdg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Cbzv+Qod; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Cbzv+Qod" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1756332317; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=D/EwzdzyNFR+ewVEEFqEze2ovwyb82bK+Rce3/V3U0s=; b=Cbzv+QodSL96TGiaVOHfYWgFTRS07Su5HxgNFzKPddJL6Qu2Ow2/L9z10SM93IvbfTJKUO XgPhunMOXWX+OH69K69kgHfUNF3Zf9P+q1+NJLhZYEZQzIiTTN01AA+Tcl6a86pPFhInkt dfufnQKOoZjSTnYJjlvhavdFy62obBc= Received: from mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-319-rAeDOcrbOYu2jFZVlj4BxA-1; Wed, 27 Aug 2025 18:05:15 -0400 X-MC-Unique: rAeDOcrbOYu2jFZVlj4BxA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: rAeDOcrbOYu2jFZVlj4BxA_1756332310 Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3F20180028D; Wed, 27 Aug 2025 22:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t14s.redhat.com (unknown [10.22.80.195]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB62530001A1; Wed, 27 Aug 2025 22:04:53 +0000 (UTC) From: David Hildenbrand To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: David Hildenbrand , Zi Yan , Alexander Potapenko , Andrew Morton , Brendan Jackman , Christoph Lameter , Dennis Zhou , Dmitry Vyukov , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe , Jens Axboe , Johannes Weiner , John Hubbard , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Liam R. Howlett" , Linus Torvalds , linux-arm-kernel@axis.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Stoakes , Marco Elver , Marek Szyprowski , Michal Hocko , Mike Rapoport , Muchun Song , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Oscar Salvador , Peter Xu , Robin Murphy , Suren Baghdasaryan , Tejun Heo , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, Vlastimil Babka , wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, x86@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v1 10/36] mm: sanity-check maximum folio size in folio_set_order() Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:01:14 +0200 Message-ID: <20250827220141.262669-11-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20250827220141.262669-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20250827220141.262669-1-david@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 Let's sanity-check in folio_set_order() whether we would be trying to create a folio with an order that would make it exceed MAX_FOLIO_ORDER. This will enable the check whenever a folio/compound page is initialized through prepare_compound_head() / prepare_compound_page(). Reviewed-by: Zi Yan Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- mm/internal.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h index 45da9ff5694f6..9b0129531d004 100644 --- a/mm/internal.h +++ b/mm/internal.h @@ -755,6 +755,7 @@ static inline void folio_set_order(struct folio *folio, unsigned int order) { if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!order || !folio_test_large(folio))) return; + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(order > MAX_FOLIO_ORDER); folio->_flags_1 = (folio->_flags_1 & ~0xffUL) | order; #ifdef NR_PAGES_IN_LARGE_FOLIO -- 2.50.1