From: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: csander@purestorage.com, asml.silence@gmail.com,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] io_uring/rsrc: split io_buffer_register_request() logic
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 11:21:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260324182157.990864-3-joannelkoong@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324182157.990864-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Split the main initialization logic in io_buffer_register_request() into
a helper function.
This is a preparatory patch for supporting kernel-populated buffers in
fuse io-uring, which will be reusing this logic.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
---
io_uring/rsrc.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/rsrc.c b/io_uring/rsrc.c
index 7579f6992a25..01c3619e5f07 100644
--- a/io_uring/rsrc.c
+++ b/io_uring/rsrc.c
@@ -924,64 +924,82 @@ int io_sqe_buffers_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg,
return ret;
}
-int io_buffer_register_request(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, struct request *rq,
- void (*release)(void *), unsigned int index,
- unsigned int issue_flags)
+static struct io_mapped_ubuf *io_kernel_buffer_init(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
+ unsigned int nr_bvecs,
+ unsigned int total_bytes,
+ u8 dir,
+ void (*release)(void *),
+ void *priv,
+ unsigned int index)
{
- struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = cmd_to_io_kiocb(cmd)->ctx;
struct io_rsrc_data *data = &ctx->buf_table;
- struct req_iterator rq_iter;
struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu;
struct io_rsrc_node *node;
- struct bio_vec bv;
- unsigned int nr_bvecs = 0;
- int ret = 0;
- io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, issue_flags);
- if (index >= data->nr) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto unlock;
- }
+ if (index >= data->nr)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
index = array_index_nospec(index, data->nr);
- if (data->nodes[index]) {
- ret = -EBUSY;
- goto unlock;
- }
+ if (data->nodes[index])
+ return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
node = io_rsrc_node_alloc(ctx, IORING_RSRC_BUFFER);
- if (!node) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto unlock;
- }
+ if (!node)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- /*
- * blk_rq_nr_phys_segments() may overestimate the number of bvecs
- * but avoids needing to iterate over the bvecs
- */
- imu = io_alloc_imu(ctx, blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(rq));
+ imu = io_alloc_imu(ctx, nr_bvecs);
if (!imu) {
kfree(node);
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto unlock;
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
imu->ubuf = 0;
- imu->len = blk_rq_bytes(rq);
+ imu->len = total_bytes;
imu->acct_pages = 0;
imu->folio_shift = PAGE_SHIFT;
+ imu->nr_bvecs = nr_bvecs;
refcount_set(&imu->refs, 1);
imu->release = release;
- imu->priv = rq;
+ imu->priv = priv;
+ imu->dir = dir;
imu->flags = IO_REGBUF_F_KBUF;
- imu->dir = 1 << rq_data_dir(rq);
+ node->buf = imu;
+ data->nodes[index] = node;
+
+ return imu;
+}
+
+int io_buffer_register_request(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, struct request *rq,
+ void (*release)(void *), unsigned int index,
+ unsigned int issue_flags)
+{
+ struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = cmd_to_io_kiocb(cmd)->ctx;
+ struct req_iterator rq_iter;
+ struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu;
+ struct bio_vec bv;
+ /*
+ * blk_rq_nr_phys_segments() may overestimate the number of bvecs
+ * but avoids needing to iterate over the bvecs
+ */
+ unsigned int nr_bvecs = blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(rq);
+ unsigned int total_bytes = blk_rq_bytes(rq);
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, issue_flags);
+
+ imu = io_kernel_buffer_init(ctx, nr_bvecs, total_bytes,
+ 1 << rq_data_dir(rq), release, rq, index);
+ if (IS_ERR(imu)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(imu);
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+
+ nr_bvecs = 0;
rq_for_each_bvec(bv, rq, rq_iter)
imu->bvec[nr_bvecs++] = bv;
imu->nr_bvecs = nr_bvecs;
- node->buf = imu;
- data->nodes[index] = node;
unlock:
io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, issue_flags);
return ret;
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-24 18:21 [PATCH v2 0/5] io_uring: extend bvec registration and add mem region lookup Joanne Koong
2026-03-24 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] io_uring/rsrc: rename io_buffer_register_bvec()/io_buffer_unregister_bvec() Joanne Koong
2026-03-24 18:21 ` Joanne Koong [this message]
2026-03-24 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] io_uring/rsrc: allow buffer release callback to be optional Joanne Koong
2026-03-24 22:05 ` Joanne Koong
2026-03-24 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] io_uring/rsrc: add io_buffer_register_bvec() Joanne Koong
2026-03-24 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] io_uring/rsrc: add io_uring_registered_mem_region_get() Joanne Koong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260324182157.990864-3-joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--to=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox