Linux io-uring development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: split alloc and add of overflow
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 19:27:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b6e1d2f-91e4-43aa-a08c-9b1e946c458e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0d9fb95-5539-4a5d-972f-6904c1b9c2db@kernel.dk>

On 5/16/25 17:57, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/16/25 10:58 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 5/16/25 17:44, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 5/16/25 10:43 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>> On 5/16/25 17:08, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>> Add a new helper, io_alloc_ocqe(), that simply allocates and fills an
>>>>> overflow entry. Then it can get done outside of the locking section,
>>>>> and hence use more appropriate gfp_t allocation flags rather than always
>>>>> default to GFP_ATOMIC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Suggested-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> I didn't suggest that. If anything, it complicates CQE posting
>>>> helpers when we should be moving in the opposite direction.
>>>
>>> I'll kill the attribution then - it's not meant to mean the
>>> approach, but the concept of being able to use GFP_KERNEL
>>> when we can.
>>
>> Sure, but that will be blurred by time, while the patch IMHO is
>> making it worse and should never see the light.
> 
> Well, you're certainly cheerful today.

Only extending an opinion, which, it seems, you're going to
shrug off. That's fine, I just need to learn my lessons and
stop caring about improving the code base.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-16 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-16 16:08 [PATCHSET 0/2] Allow non-atomic allocs for overflows Jens Axboe
2025-05-16 16:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: split alloc and add of overflow Jens Axboe
2025-05-16 16:31   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-05-16 16:33     ` Jens Axboe
2025-05-16 16:43   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-16 16:44     ` Jens Axboe
2025-05-16 16:58       ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-16 16:57         ` Jens Axboe
2025-05-16 18:27           ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2025-05-16 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: make io_alloc_ocqe() take a struct io_cqe pointer Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3b6e1d2f-91e4-43aa-a08c-9b1e946c458e@gmail.com \
    --to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox