From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Dylan Yudaken <dylany@fb.com>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"io-uring@vger.kernel.org" <io-uring@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 5/7] io_uring: add IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 16:36:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40332618-3ab6-2ffa-d4f6-5f3b1d8e7dc2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dc60a26605dd4cc29fe3bf7c7a67eb687fa82a4b.camel@fb.com>
On 8/15/22 16:25, Dylan Yudaken wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 15:02 +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 8/15/22 14:09, Dylan Yudaken wrote:
[...]
>> Not same thread group, they have to be executed by the same thread.
>> One of the assumptions is that current->io_uring is the same
>> as the request was initialised with.
>
> How do the wq paths work in that case? I can see in io_queue_iowq that
> we only check for same_thread_group.
It's under WARN_ON_ONCE() and should never happen, otherwise
there is a bug. iowq would io_req_complete_post() to complete.
> If required to be the same task we'd probably want to enforce
> IORING_SETUP_SINGLE_ISSUER for this flag (not a big problem).
And I guess also make sure it's not run by a different task
on the waiting side or so.
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-15 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-15 13:09 [PATCH for-next 0/7] io_uring: defer task work to when it is needed Dylan Yudaken
2022-08-15 13:09 ` [PATCH for-next 1/7] io_uring: use local ctx variable Dylan Yudaken
2022-08-15 13:46 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-08-15 15:16 ` Dylan Yudaken
2022-08-15 13:09 ` [PATCH for-next 2/7] io_uring: remove unnecessary variable Dylan Yudaken
2022-08-15 13:09 ` [PATCH for-next 3/7] io_uring: introduce io_has_work Dylan Yudaken
2022-08-15 13:09 ` [PATCH for-next 4/7] io_uring: do not always run task work at the start of io_uring_enter Dylan Yudaken
2022-08-15 13:50 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-08-15 13:09 ` [PATCH for-next 5/7] io_uring: add IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN Dylan Yudaken
2022-08-15 14:02 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-08-15 15:25 ` Dylan Yudaken
2022-08-15 15:36 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2022-08-16 15:28 ` Dylan Yudaken
2022-08-15 13:09 ` [PATCH for-next 6/7] io_uring: move io_eventfd_put Dylan Yudaken
2022-08-15 13:09 ` [PATCH for-next 7/7] io_uring: signal registered eventfd to process deferred task work Dylan Yudaken
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40332618-3ab6-2ffa-d4f6-5f3b1d8e7dc2@gmail.com \
--to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dylany@fb.com \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox