Re: [PATCH 0/8] second part of 5.12 patches

Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-26T02:36:37Z

On 25/01/2021 17:04, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/25/21 9:56 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 25/01/2021 16:08, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 1/25/21 4:42 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>
>>> Applied 1-2 for now. Maybe the context state is workable for the
>>> state, if the numbers are looking this good. I'll try and run
>>> it here too and see what I find.
>>
>> I believe I've seen it jumping from ~9.5M to 14M with turbo boost
>> and not so strict environment, but this claim is not very reliable.
>
> Would be nice to see some numbers using eg a network echo bench,
> or storage that actually does IO. Even null_blk is better than just
> a nop benchmark, even if that one is nice to use as well. But better
> as a complement than the main thing.

I think direct I/O null_blk won't cut because it completes through a
callback, but maybe some buffered rw. Yeah, good idea to try something
more realistic.

--
Pavel Begunkov