From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>, hch@lst.de
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, ming.lei@redhat.com,
joshiiitr@gmail.com, gost.dev@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] iopoll support for io_uring/nvme passthrough
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 11:04:22 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <78f0ac8e-cd45-d71d-4e10-e6d2f910ae45@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220805154226.155008-1-joshi.k@samsung.com>
On 8/5/22 9:42 AM, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Series enables async polling on io_uring command, and nvme passthrough
> (for io-commands) is wired up to leverage that.
>
> 512b randread performance (KIOP) below:
>
> QD_batch block passthru passthru-poll block-poll
> 1_1 80 81 158 157
> 8_2 406 470 680 700
> 16_4 620 656 931 920
> 128_32 879 1056 1120 1132
Curious on why passthru is slower than block-poll? Are we missing
something here?
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-05 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20220805155300epcas5p1b98722e20990d0095238964e2be9db34@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2022-08-05 15:42 ` [PATCH 0/4] iopoll support for io_uring/nvme passthrough Kanchan Joshi
2022-08-05 15:42 ` [PATCH 1/4] fs: add file_operations->uring_cmd_iopoll Kanchan Joshi
2022-08-05 15:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] io_uring: add iopoll infrastructure for io_uring_cmd Kanchan Joshi
2022-08-05 15:42 ` [PATCH 3/4] block: export blk_rq_is_poll Kanchan Joshi
2022-08-05 15:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] nvme: wire up async polling for io passthrough commands Kanchan Joshi
2022-08-05 17:03 ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-05 17:07 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-08-05 21:22 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-06 0:06 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-06 1:38 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-07 12:25 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-05 17:04 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2022-08-05 17:13 ` [PATCH 0/4] iopoll support for io_uring/nvme passthrough Kanchan Joshi
2022-08-05 17:27 ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-05 17:18 ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-05 18:11 ` Keith Busch
2022-08-05 18:15 ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-07 17:58 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-08-07 18:46 ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-05 18:21 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=78f0ac8e-cd45-d71d-4e10-e6d2f910ae45@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
--cc=joshiiitr@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox