Re: io_uring vs CPU hotplug, was Re: [PATCH 5/9] blk-mq: don't set data->ctx and data->hctx in blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:14:18AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> When the CPU is finally offlined, i.e. the CPU cleared the online bit in
>> the online mask is definitely too late simply because it still runs on
>> that outgoing CPU _after_ the hardware queue is shut down and drained.
>
> IMO, the patch in Christoph's blk-mq-hotplug.2 still works for percpu
> kthread.
>
> It is just not optimal in the retrying, but it should be fine. When the
> percpu kthread is scheduled on the CPU to be offlined:
>
> - if the kthread doesn't observe the INACTIVE flag, the allocated request
> will be drained.
>
> - otherwise, the kthread just retries and retries to allocate & release,
> and sooner or later, its time slice is consumed, and migrated out, and the
> cpu hotplug handler will get chance to run and move on, then the cpu is
> shutdown.

1) This is based on the assumption that the kthread is in the SCHED_OTHER
   scheduling class. Is that really a valid assumption?

2) What happens in the following scenario:

   unplug

     mq_offline
       set_ctx_inactive()
       drain_io()
       
   io_kthread()
       try_queue()
       wait_on_ctx()

   Can this happen and if so what will wake up that thread?

I'm not familiar enough with that code to answer #2, but this really
wants to be properly described and documented.

Thanks,

        tglx